TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock
TEN Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (XHLD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XHLD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XHLD | $1.49 | -2.94% | 2.9M | -0.27 | -$5.46 | N/A |
| CCZ | $62.64 | -2.70% | 15.8B | 54.33 | $1.17 | +2.84% |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $20.47 | +1.29% | 3.3B | 15.15 | $1.34 | +2.46% |
| NMAX | $6.98 | +2.20% | 632.8M | -8.00 | -$0.88 | N/A |
| GTN-A | $10.72 | -0.74% | 617.6M | -7.72 | -$1.41 | +6.93% |
| SSP | $3.92 | -3.81% | 468.6M | -2.12 | -$1.87 | N/A |
| GTN | $4.66 | -3.82% | 432.3M | -3.28 | -$1.41 | +6.93% |
Stock Comparison
XHLD vs CCZ Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while CCZ trades at $62.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 54.33. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check CCZ's competition here
XHLD vs LSXMK Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check LSXMK's competition here
XHLD vs LSXMA Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check LSXMA's competition here
XHLD vs LSXMB Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check LSXMB's competition here
XHLD vs TGNA Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while TGNA trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check TGNA's competition here
XHLD vs NMAX Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 632.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while NMAX trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check NMAX's competition here
XHLD vs GTN-A Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 617.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while GTN-A trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check GTN-A's competition here
XHLD vs SSP Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 468.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while SSP trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SSP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check SSP's competition here
XHLD vs GTN Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 432.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while GTN trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to GTN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check GTN's competition here
XHLD vs FUBO Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 418M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while FUBO trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is less volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check FUBO's competition here
XHLD vs IHRT Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 345.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while IHRT trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check IHRT's competition here
XHLD vs EVC Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while EVC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check EVC's competition here
XHLD vs CURI Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while CURI trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -33.05. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check CURI's competition here
XHLD vs SGA Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while SGA trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 227.80. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SGA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check SGA's competition here
XHLD vs SJ Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while SJ trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check SJ's competition here
XHLD vs MDIA Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while MDIA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check MDIA's competition here
XHLD vs UONEK Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while UONEK trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check UONEK's competition here
XHLD vs UONE Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while UONE trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to UONE's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check UONE's competition here
XHLD vs AUD Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to AUD's ROE of +24.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check AUD's competition here
XHLD vs SALM Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while SALM trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check SALM's competition here
XHLD vs BBGI Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while BBGI trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check BBGI's competition here
XHLD vs CURIW Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 723.6K. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while CURIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check CURIW's competition here
XHLD vs CMLS Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 94.2K. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while CMLS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CMLS's ROE of +9.99%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check CMLS's competition here
XHLD vs QVCD Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while QVCD trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check QVCD's competition here
XHLD vs QVCC Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while QVCC trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is more volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check QVCC's competition here
XHLD vs DISCA Comparison March 2026
XHLD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XHLD stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XHLD is priced at $1.49, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XHLD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, XHLD's ROE is -3.46%, compared to DISCA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XHLD is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XHLD.Check DISCA's competition here