Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (DISCA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DISCA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DISCA | $24.43 | +5.90% | 0 | 17.73 | $1.38 | N/A |
| CCZ | $64.54 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 55.07 | $1.17 | +2.82% |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $20.03 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 14.95 | $1.34 | +2.50% |
| FUBO | $12.01 | -2.12% | 1.3B | 3.13 | $3.84 | N/A |
| IHRT | $5.42 | +35.16% | 702.2M | -1.77 | -$3.06 | N/A |
| GTN-A | $10.32 | -6.27% | 617M | -7.72 | -$1.41 | +5.76% |
| SSP | $4.75 | -2.26% | 560.6M | -2.54 | -$1.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DISCA vs CCZ Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while CCZ trades at $64.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 55.07. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check CCZ's competition here
DISCA vs LSXMK Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check LSXMK's competition here
DISCA vs LSXMA Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check LSXMA's competition here
DISCA vs LSXMB Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check LSXMB's competition here
DISCA vs TGNA Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while TGNA trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check TGNA's competition here
DISCA vs FUBO Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while FUBO trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check FUBO's competition here
DISCA vs IHRT Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 702.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while IHRT trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check IHRT's competition here
DISCA vs GTN-A Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 617M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while GTN-A trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check GTN-A's competition here
DISCA vs SSP Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 560.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while SSP trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check SSP's competition here
DISCA vs NMAX Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while NMAX trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check NMAX's competition here
DISCA vs GTN Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 520.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while GTN trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check GTN's competition here
DISCA vs EVC Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 347M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while EVC trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check EVC's competition here
DISCA vs CURI Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 198.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while CURI trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -30.55. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check CURI's competition here
DISCA vs SGA Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while SGA trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check SGA's competition here
DISCA vs MDIA Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while MDIA trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check MDIA's competition here
DISCA vs SJ Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while SJ trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check SJ's competition here
DISCA vs BBGI Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while BBGI trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is less volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check BBGI's competition here
DISCA vs UONEK Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while UONEK trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check UONEK's competition here
DISCA vs AUD Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AUD's ROE of +24.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check AUD's competition here
DISCA vs UONE Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while UONE trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UONE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check UONE's competition here
DISCA vs SALM Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while SALM trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check SALM's competition here
DISCA vs XHLD Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while XHLD trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check XHLD's competition here
DISCA vs CURIW Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 723.6K. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while CURIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check CURIW's competition here
DISCA vs CMLS Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 85.6K. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while CMLS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMLS's ROE of +2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check CMLS's competition here
DISCA vs EMMSP Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, EMMSP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while EMMSP trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas EMMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMMSP's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is less volatile compared to EMMSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check EMMSP's competition here
DISCA vs QVCD Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while QVCD trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is more volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check QVCD's competition here
DISCA vs QVCC Comparison April 2026
DISCA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DISCA stands at 0. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DISCA is priced at $24.43, while QVCC trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DISCA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.73, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DISCA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, DISCA is less volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DISCA.Check QVCC's competition here