Cumulus Media Inc.
Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CMLS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMLS | $0.01 | -9.09% | 85.6K | -0.00 | -$16.96 | N/A |
| CCZ | $64.54 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 55.07 | $1.17 | +2.82% |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $20.03 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 14.95 | $1.34 | +2.50% |
| FUBO | $12.01 | -2.12% | 1.3B | 3.13 | $3.84 | N/A |
| IHRT | $5.42 | +35.16% | 702.2M | -1.77 | -$3.06 | N/A |
| GTN-A | $10.32 | -6.27% | 617M | -7.72 | -$1.41 | +5.76% |
| SSP | $4.75 | -2.26% | 560.6M | -2.54 | -$1.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CMLS vs CCZ Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while CCZ trades at $64.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 55.07. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check CCZ's competition here
CMLS vs LSXMK Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check LSXMK's competition here
CMLS vs LSXMA Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check LSXMA's competition here
CMLS vs LSXMB Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check LSXMB's competition here
CMLS vs TGNA Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while TGNA trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check TGNA's competition here
CMLS vs FUBO Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while FUBO trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check FUBO's competition here
CMLS vs IHRT Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 702.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while IHRT trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check IHRT's competition here
CMLS vs GTN-A Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 617M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while GTN-A trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check GTN-A's competition here
CMLS vs SSP Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 560.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while SSP trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to SSP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check SSP's competition here
CMLS vs NMAX Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while NMAX trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check NMAX's competition here
CMLS vs GTN Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 520.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while GTN trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to GTN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check GTN's competition here
CMLS vs EVC Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 347M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while EVC trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check EVC's competition here
CMLS vs CURI Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 198.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while CURI trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -30.55. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check CURI's competition here
CMLS vs SGA Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while SGA trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to SGA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check SGA's competition here
CMLS vs MDIA Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while MDIA trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check MDIA's competition here
CMLS vs SJ Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while SJ trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check SJ's competition here
CMLS vs BBGI Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while BBGI trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check BBGI's competition here
CMLS vs UONEK Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while UONEK trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check UONEK's competition here
CMLS vs AUD Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to AUD's ROE of +24.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check AUD's competition here
CMLS vs UONE Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while UONE trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to UONE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check UONE's competition here
CMLS vs SALM Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while SALM trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check SALM's competition here
CMLS vs XHLD Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while XHLD trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check XHLD's competition here
CMLS vs CURIW Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 723.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while CURIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check CURIW's competition here
CMLS vs EMMSP Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, EMMSP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while EMMSP trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EMMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to EMMSP's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to EMMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check EMMSP's competition here
CMLS vs DISCA Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to DISCA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check DISCA's competition here
CMLS vs QVCD Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while QVCD trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check QVCD's competition here
CMLS vs QVCC Comparison April 2026
CMLS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMLS stands at 85.6K. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMLS is priced at $0.01, while QVCC trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMLS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMLS's ROE is +2.59%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CMLS is more volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMLS.Check QVCC's competition here