Gray Media, Inc.
Gray Media, Inc. (GTN-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GTN-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTN-A | $9.49 | -9.88% | 469M | -5.44 | -$1.52 | +8.21% |
| CCZ | $63.90 | +0.00% | 15.9B | 54.52 | $1.17 | +5.32% |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $20.03 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 14.95 | $1.34 | +2.50% |
| FUBO | $9.18 | -2.13% | 1B | 2.40 | $3.84 | N/A |
| EVC | $7.97 | -0.44% | 742.8M | -40.35 | -$0.20 | +2.53% |
| NMAX | $7.22 | +0.00% | 631.5M | -14.34 | -$0.49 | N/A |
| IHRT | $4.78 | -7.82% | 611M | -2.57 | -$1.83 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GTN-A vs CCZ Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while CCZ trades at $63.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 54.52. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check CCZ's competition here
GTN-A vs LSXMA Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check LSXMA's competition here
GTN-A vs LSXMK Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check LSXMK's competition here
GTN-A vs LSXMB Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check LSXMB's competition here
GTN-A vs TGNA Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while TGNA trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check TGNA's competition here
GTN-A vs FUBO Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while FUBO trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUBO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check FUBO's competition here
GTN-A vs EVC Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 742.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while EVC trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -40.35. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check EVC's competition here
GTN-A vs NMAX Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 631.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while NMAX trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -14.34. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check NMAX's competition here
GTN-A vs IHRT Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 611M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while IHRT trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check IHRT's competition here
GTN-A vs SSP Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 381.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while SSP trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SSP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check SSP's competition here
GTN-A vs GTN Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while GTN trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GTN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check GTN's competition here
GTN-A vs CURI Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while CURI trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check CURI's competition here
GTN-A vs SGA Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while SGA trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check SGA's competition here
GTN-A vs SJ Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while SJ trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SJ's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check SJ's competition here
GTN-A vs MDIA Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while MDIA trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check MDIA's competition here
GTN-A vs UONEK Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while UONEK trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check UONEK's competition here
GTN-A vs BBGI Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while BBGI trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check BBGI's competition here
GTN-A vs SALM Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while SALM trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check SALM's competition here
GTN-A vs AUD Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AUD's ROE of +24.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check AUD's competition here
GTN-A vs UONE Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while UONE trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UONE's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check UONE's competition here
GTN-A vs XHLD Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while XHLD trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check XHLD's competition here
GTN-A vs CURIW Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 723.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while CURIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check CURIW's competition here
GTN-A vs CMLS Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 85.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while CMLS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMLS's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check CMLS's competition here
GTN-A vs DISCA Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DISCA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check DISCA's competition here
GTN-A vs EMMSP Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, EMMSP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while EMMSP trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas EMMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EMMSP's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to EMMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check EMMSP's competition here
GTN-A vs QVCC Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while QVCC trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check QVCC's competition here
GTN-A vs QVCD Comparison May 2026
GTN-A plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN-A stands at 469M. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN-A is priced at $9.49, while QVCD trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN-A currently has a P/E ratio of -5.44, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN-A's ROE is -0.03%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN-A is more volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN-A.Check QVCD's competition here