Western Metals Corporation
Western Metals Corporation (WTLC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WTLC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTLC | $0.38 | -0.27% | 2.9M | -1.34 | -$0.28 | N/A |
JXHGF | $5.75 | +9.07% | 15.5B | 191.67 | $0.03 | +2.83% |
JXHLY | $10.68 | +1.47% | 13.8B | 204.10 | $0.05 | +2.53% |
NTOIF | $16.08 | +1.58% | 12B | -55.96 | -$0.28 | +5.64% |
NTOIY | $8.18 | +4.34% | 12B | -55.57 | -$0.14 | +5.62% |
IDKOF | $7.25 | +14.17% | 9.3B | 13.94 | $0.52 | +0.02% |
SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.4B | 5.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
KLYCY | $9.28 | -7.85% | 8B | 9.67 | $0.96 | +4.65% |
IDKOY | $12.30 | -6.39% | 7.5B | 11.83 | $1.04 | +2.45% |
DCCPF | $73.38 | +17.63% | 7.2B | 26.30 | $2.79 | +3.70% |
Stock Comparison
WTLC vs JXHGF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while JXHGF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 191.67. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to JXHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check JXHGF's competition here
WTLC vs JXHLY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while JXHLY trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 204.10. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check JXHLY's competition here
WTLC vs NTOIF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while NTOIF trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is -55.96. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NTOIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to NTOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check NTOIF's competition here
WTLC vs NTOIY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while NTOIY trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is -55.57. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NTOIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check NTOIY's competition here
WTLC vs IDKOF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while IDKOF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to IDKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check IDKOF's competition here
WTLC vs SAAFY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check SAAFY's competition here
WTLC vs KLYCY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while KLYCY trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to KLYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check KLYCY's competition here
WTLC vs IDKOY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while IDKOY trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check IDKOY's competition here
WTLC vs DCCPF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while DCCPF trades at $73.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check DCCPF's competition here
WTLC vs KUNUF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while KUNUF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to KUNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check KUNUF's competition here
WTLC vs DCCPY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while DCCPY trades at $32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check DCCPY's competition here
WTLC vs MOHCY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while MOHCY trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check MOHCY's competition here
WTLC vs PKIUF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while PKIUF trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check PKIUF's competition here
WTLC vs CTXAF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while CTXAF trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 58.48. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to CTXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check CTXAF's competition here
WTLC vs PNADF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to PNADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check PNADF's competition here
WTLC vs SHIIY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check SHIIY's competition here
WTLC vs CTXAY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while CTXAY trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to CTXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check CTXAY's competition here
WTLC vs RBSFY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while RBSFY trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check RBSFY's competition here
WTLC vs MOHCF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while MOHCF trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to MOHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check MOHCF's competition here
WTLC vs RUBSF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while RUBSF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to RUBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check RUBSF's competition here
WTLC vs TOIPY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while TOIPY trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to TOIPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check TOIPY's competition here
WTLC vs TOIPF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while TOIPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to TOIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check TOIPF's competition here
WTLC vs PKCPY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while PKCPY trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to PKCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check PKCPY's competition here
WTLC vs FJLLF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while FJLLF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to FJLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check FJLLF's competition here
WTLC vs IRPSY Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while IRPSY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to IRPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check IRPSY's competition here
WTLC vs OILRF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 808.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while OILRF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to OILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check OILRF's competition here
WTLC vs TPHIF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to TPHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check TPHIF's competition here
WTLC vs CAOLF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 474M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while CAOLF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to CAOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check CAOLF's competition here
WTLC vs NZRFF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 471.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while NZRFF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to NZRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check NZRFF's competition here
WTLC vs FGPRB Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while FGPRB trades at $135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to FGPRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check FGPRB's competition here
WTLC vs REGX Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to REGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check REGX's competition here
WTLC vs CLSZF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 81.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while CLSZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to CLSZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check CLSZF's competition here
WTLC vs FGPR Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while FGPR trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FGPR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check FGPR's competition here
WTLC vs BDCO Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while BDCO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check BDCO's competition here
WTLC vs ISRJF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while ISRJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to ISRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check ISRJF's competition here
WTLC vs QREE Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while QREE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to QREE's ROE of +5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check QREE's competition here
WTLC vs LCNTU Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while LCNTU trades at $460.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to LCNTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check LCNTU's competition here
WTLC vs SRNW Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while SRNW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SRNW's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to SRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check SRNW's competition here
WTLC vs BERI Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 147.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while BERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BERI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check BERI's competition here
WTLC vs DVFI Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to DVFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check DVFI's competition here
WTLC vs IAHL Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to IAHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check IAHL's competition here
WTLC vs ABLE Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check ABLE's competition here
WTLC vs TOAOF Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to TOAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check TOAOF's competition here
WTLC vs LNKE Comparison August 2025
WTLC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTLC stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTLC is priced at $0.38, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTLC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.34, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WTLC's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTLC is more volatile compared to LNKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTLC.Check LNKE's competition here