Neste Oyj (NTOIY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NTOIY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTOIY | $16.76 | +0.96% | 25.8B | 31.09 | $0.54 | +0.69% |
| NTOIF | $33.00 | -6.48% | 25.4B | 30.56 | $1.08 | +0.70% |
| JXHGF | $8.00 | +0.50% | 21.5B | 13.33 | $0.60 | +4.74% |
| JXHLY | $15.73 | +0.51% | 21.2B | 13.11 | $1.20 | +2.41% |
| IDKOY | $17.59 | -0.06% | 10.7B | 10.05 | $1.75 | +2.30% |
| MOHCY | $22.20 | -1.07% | 9.6B | 4.63 | $4.79 | +3.91% |
| KUNUF | $0.97 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 9.70 | $0.10 | +4.59% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.4B | 5.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
| IDKOF | $6.75 | -22.86% | 8.2B | 7.67 | $0.88 | +3.61% |
| KLYCY | $8.45 | +3.05% | 7.8B | 9.85 | $0.91 | +5.01% |
Stock Comparison
NTOIY vs NTOIF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while NTOIF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTOIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to NTOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check NTOIF's competition here
NTOIY vs JXHGF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while JXHGF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to JXHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check JXHGF's competition here
NTOIY vs JXHLY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while JXHLY trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check JXHLY's competition here
NTOIY vs IDKOY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while IDKOY trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check IDKOY's competition here
NTOIY vs MOHCY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while MOHCY trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check MOHCY's competition here
NTOIY vs KUNUF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while KUNUF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to KUNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check KUNUF's competition here
NTOIY vs SAAFY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check SAAFY's competition here
NTOIY vs IDKOF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while IDKOF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to IDKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check IDKOF's competition here
NTOIY vs KLYCY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while KLYCY trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is less volatile compared to KLYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check KLYCY's competition here
NTOIY vs DCCPY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while DCCPY trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check DCCPY's competition here
NTOIY vs DCCPF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while DCCPF trades at $78.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check DCCPF's competition here
NTOIY vs CTXAY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while CTXAY trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 102.14. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to CTXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check CTXAY's competition here
NTOIY vs PKIUF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while PKIUF trades at $28.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check PKIUF's competition here
NTOIY vs TOIPF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while TOIPF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to TOIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check TOIPF's competition here
NTOIY vs PNADF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to PNADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check PNADF's competition here
NTOIY vs RBSFY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while RBSFY trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check RBSFY's competition here
NTOIY vs SHIIY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check SHIIY's competition here
NTOIY vs RUBSF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while RUBSF trades at $39.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to RUBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check RUBSF's competition here
NTOIY vs CTXAF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to CTXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check CTXAF's competition here
NTOIY vs TOIPY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while TOIPY trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to TOIPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check TOIPY's competition here
NTOIY vs MOHCF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while MOHCF trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is less volatile compared to MOHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check MOHCF's competition here
NTOIY vs FJLLF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while FJLLF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is less volatile compared to FJLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check FJLLF's competition here
NTOIY vs CAOLF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while CAOLF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to CAOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check CAOLF's competition here
NTOIY vs PKCPY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while PKCPY trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to PKCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check PKCPY's competition here
NTOIY vs IRPSY Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while IRPSY trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to IRPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check IRPSY's competition here
NTOIY vs OILRF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while OILRF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to OILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check OILRF's competition here
NTOIY vs FGPRB Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 971.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while FGPRB trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to FGPRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check FGPRB's competition here
NTOIY vs NZRFF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 924.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while NZRFF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 74.33. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to NZRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check NZRFF's competition here
NTOIY vs TPHIF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to TPHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check TPHIF's competition here
NTOIY vs CLSZF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while CLSZF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to CLSZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check CLSZF's competition here
NTOIY vs REGX Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to REGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check REGX's competition here
NTOIY vs FGPR Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while FGPR trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGPR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check FGPR's competition here
NTOIY vs BDCO Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while BDCO trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BDCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check BDCO's competition here
NTOIY vs ISRJF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while ISRJF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to ISRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check ISRJF's competition here
NTOIY vs LCNTU Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while LCNTU trades at $460.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to LCNTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check LCNTU's competition here
NTOIY vs WTLC Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to WTLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check WTLC's competition here
NTOIY vs SRNW Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 980.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while SRNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRNW's ROE of -23.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to SRNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check SRNW's competition here
NTOIY vs DVFI Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to DVFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check DVFI's competition here
NTOIY vs BERI Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 23.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while BERI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BERI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is less volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check BERI's competition here
NTOIY vs QREE Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while QREE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QREE's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is less volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check QREE's competition here
NTOIY vs IAHL Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to IAHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check IAHL's competition here
NTOIY vs ABLE Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 30. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check ABLE's competition here
NTOIY vs TOAOF Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to TOAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check TOAOF's competition here
NTOIY vs LNKE Comparison June 2026
NTOIY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIY stands at 25.8B. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIY is priced at $16.76, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIY currently has a P/E ratio of 31.09, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIY's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIY is more volatile compared to LNKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIY.Check LNKE's competition here