Rubis
Rubis (RBSFY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RBSFY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBSFY | $8.43 | -3.10% | 4.4B | 12.04 | $0.70 | +7.48% |
| NTOIY | $16.64 | -1.07% | 25.5B | 30.15 | $0.55 | +0.70% |
| NTOIF | $32.23 | +0.00% | 24.8B | 29.30 | $1.10 | +0.71% |
| JXHGF | $9.12 | +1.33% | 24.5B | 14.96 | $0.61 | +4.15% |
| JXHLY | $17.69 | +0.23% | 23.8B | 80.41 | $0.22 | +1.50% |
| IDKOY | $17.65 | +0.00% | 10.7B | 9.86 | $1.79 | +1.84% |
| IDKOF | $8.75 | +0.00% | 10.6B | 9.83 | $0.89 | +2.78% |
| KUNUF | $1.15 | +0.00% | 10B | 11.50 | $0.10 | +3.78% |
| MOHCY | $21.09 | +0.00% | 9.1B | 5.99 | $3.52 | +4.12% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.4B | 5.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RBSFY vs NTOIY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while NTOIY trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTOIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check NTOIY's competition here
RBSFY vs NTOIF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while NTOIF trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTOIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to NTOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check NTOIF's competition here
RBSFY vs JXHGF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while JXHGF trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and JXHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JXHGF's competition here
RBSFY vs JXHLY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while JXHLY trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 80.41. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check JXHLY's competition here
RBSFY vs IDKOY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while IDKOY trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check IDKOY's competition here
RBSFY vs IDKOF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while IDKOF trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to IDKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check IDKOF's competition here
RBSFY vs KUNUF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while KUNUF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and KUNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUNUF's competition here
RBSFY vs MOHCY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while MOHCY trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check MOHCY's competition here
RBSFY vs SAAFY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check SAAFY's competition here
RBSFY vs KLYCY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while KLYCY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and KLYCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KLYCY's competition here
RBSFY vs DCCPY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while DCCPY trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 44.89. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check DCCPY's competition here
RBSFY vs DCCPF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while DCCPF trades at $78.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 44.61. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check DCCPF's competition here
RBSFY vs CTXAY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while CTXAY trades at $50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 100.18. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to CTXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check CTXAY's competition here
RBSFY vs PKIUF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while PKIUF trades at $28.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check PKIUF's competition here
RBSFY vs PNADF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and PNADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNADF's competition here
RBSFY vs SHIIY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check SHIIY's competition here
RBSFY vs RUBSF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while RUBSF trades at $39.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and RUBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RUBSF's competition here
RBSFY vs CTXAF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and CTXAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTXAF's competition here
RBSFY vs TOIPY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while TOIPY trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and TOIPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOIPY's competition here
RBSFY vs TOIPF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while TOIPF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to TOIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check TOIPF's competition here
RBSFY vs MOHCF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while MOHCF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to MOHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check MOHCF's competition here
RBSFY vs OILRF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while OILRF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and OILRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OILRF's competition here
RBSFY vs FJLLF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while FJLLF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to FJLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check FJLLF's competition here
RBSFY vs CAOLF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while CAOLF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and CAOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOLF's competition here
RBSFY vs PKCPY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while PKCPY trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and PKCPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKCPY's competition here
RBSFY vs IRPSY Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while IRPSY trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and IRPSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRPSY's competition here
RBSFY vs FGPRB Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 971.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while FGPRB trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to FGPRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check FGPRB's competition here
RBSFY vs TPHIF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and TPHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TPHIF's competition here
RBSFY vs NZRFF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 671.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while NZRFF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to NZRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check NZRFF's competition here
RBSFY vs REGX Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and REGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REGX's competition here
RBSFY vs FGPR Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while FGPR trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FGPR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check FGPR's competition here
RBSFY vs CLSZF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while CLSZF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to CLSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check CLSZF's competition here
RBSFY vs BDCO Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while BDCO trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check BDCO's competition here
RBSFY vs ISRJF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while ISRJF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and ISRJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISRJF's competition here
RBSFY vs LCNTU Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while LCNTU trades at $460.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and LCNTU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LCNTU's competition here
RBSFY vs WTLC Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and WTLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTLC's competition here
RBSFY vs SRNW Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 294K. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while SRNW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SRNW's ROE of -23.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and SRNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRNW's competition here
RBSFY vs DVFI Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and DVFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVFI's competition here
RBSFY vs BERI Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 23.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while BERI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BERI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check BERI's competition here
RBSFY vs QREE Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while QREE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QREE's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check QREE's competition here
RBSFY vs IAHL Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and IAHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAHL's competition here
RBSFY vs ABLE Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 30. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSFY.Check ABLE's competition here
RBSFY vs TOAOF Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and TOAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOAOF's competition here
RBSFY vs LNKE Comparison May 2026
RBSFY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSFY stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBSFY is priced at $8.43, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSFY currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RBSFY's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBSFY and LNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNKE's competition here