Neste Oyj (NTOIF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NTOIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTOIF | $35.29 | +0.00% | 27.1B | 32.98 | $1.07 | +0.65% |
| NTOIY | $16.11 | -3.86% | 24.8B | 29.83 | $0.54 | +0.72% |
| JXHGF | $8.00 | +0.50% | 21.5B | 13.33 | $0.60 | +4.74% |
| JXHLY | $15.28 | -2.86% | 20.5B | 12.73 | $1.20 | +2.54% |
| IDKOY | $16.70 | -5.06% | 10.2B | 9.54 | $1.75 | +2.46% |
| MOHCY | $22.20 | -1.07% | 9.6B | 4.63 | $4.79 | +3.91% |
| KUNUF | $0.97 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 9.70 | $0.10 | +4.59% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.4B | 5.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
| IDKOF | $6.75 | -22.86% | 8.2B | 7.67 | $0.88 | +3.61% |
| DCCPY | $42.00 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 21.88 | $1.92 | +3.01% |
Stock Comparison
NTOIF vs NTOIY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while NTOIY trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTOIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check NTOIY's competition here
NTOIF vs JXHGF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while JXHGF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and JXHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JXHGF's competition here
NTOIF vs JXHLY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while JXHLY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check JXHLY's competition here
NTOIF vs IDKOY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while IDKOY trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check IDKOY's competition here
NTOIF vs MOHCY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while MOHCY trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and MOHCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MOHCY's competition here
NTOIF vs KUNUF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while KUNUF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and KUNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUNUF's competition here
NTOIF vs SAAFY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check SAAFY's competition here
NTOIF vs IDKOF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while IDKOF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and IDKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDKOF's competition here
NTOIF vs DCCPY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while DCCPY trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and DCCPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCCPY's competition here
NTOIF vs KLYCY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while KLYCY trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and KLYCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KLYCY's competition here
NTOIF vs DCCPF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while DCCPF trades at $78.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and DCCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DCCPF's competition here
NTOIF vs CTXAY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while CTXAY trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 102.14. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and CTXAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTXAY's competition here
NTOIF vs PKIUF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while PKIUF trades at $28.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check PKIUF's competition here
NTOIF vs PNADF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and PNADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNADF's competition here
NTOIF vs SHIIY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check SHIIY's competition here
NTOIF vs RBSFY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while RBSFY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and RBSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RBSFY's competition here
NTOIF vs RUBSF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while RUBSF trades at $39.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and RUBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RUBSF's competition here
NTOIF vs CTXAF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and CTXAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTXAF's competition here
NTOIF vs TOIPY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while TOIPY trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and TOIPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOIPY's competition here
NTOIF vs TOIPF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while TOIPF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and TOIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOIPF's competition here
NTOIF vs MOHCF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while MOHCF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and MOHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MOHCF's competition here
NTOIF vs FJLLF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while FJLLF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to FJLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check FJLLF's competition here
NTOIF vs PKCPY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while PKCPY trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and PKCPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKCPY's competition here
NTOIF vs CAOLF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while CAOLF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and CAOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOLF's competition here
NTOIF vs IRPSY Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while IRPSY trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to IRPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check IRPSY's competition here
NTOIF vs OILRF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while OILRF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and OILRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OILRF's competition here
NTOIF vs FGPRB Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 971.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while FGPRB trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to FGPRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check FGPRB's competition here
NTOIF vs TPHIF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and TPHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TPHIF's competition here
NTOIF vs NZRFF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 671.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while NZRFF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and NZRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZRFF's competition here
NTOIF vs CLSZF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while CLSZF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and CLSZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLSZF's competition here
NTOIF vs REGX Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and REGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REGX's competition here
NTOIF vs FGPR Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while FGPR trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGPR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and FGPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FGPR's competition here
NTOIF vs BDCO Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while BDCO trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BDCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check BDCO's competition here
NTOIF vs ISRJF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while ISRJF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and ISRJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISRJF's competition here
NTOIF vs LCNTU Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while LCNTU trades at $460.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and LCNTU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LCNTU's competition here
NTOIF vs WTLC Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and WTLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTLC's competition here
NTOIF vs SRNW Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 980.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while SRNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRNW's ROE of -23.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and SRNW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRNW's competition here
NTOIF vs DVFI Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and DVFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVFI's competition here
NTOIF vs BERI Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 23.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while BERI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BERI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check BERI's competition here
NTOIF vs QREE Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while QREE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QREE's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and QREE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QREE's competition here
NTOIF vs IAHL Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and IAHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAHL's competition here
NTOIF vs ABLE Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 30. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTOIF.Check ABLE's competition here
NTOIF vs TOAOF Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and TOAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOAOF's competition here
NTOIF vs LNKE Comparison June 2026
NTOIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTOIF stands at 27.1B. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTOIF is priced at $35.29, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTOIF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.98, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTOIF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTOIF and LNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNKE's competition here