Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. (FGPR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FGPR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGPR | $25.31 | -2.00% | 125.8M | 19.77 | $1.31 | N/A |
| NTOIY | $17.14 | +5.45% | 26.4B | 156.23 | $0.11 | +0.69% |
| NTOIF | $32.85 | +7.59% | 25.2B | 149.32 | $0.22 | +0.72% |
| JXHLY | $17.85 | +4.68% | 22B | 74.27 | $0.22 | +1.58% |
| JXHGF | $8.05 | +0.00% | 21.7B | 73.18 | $0.11 | +4.65% |
| IDKOF | $9.65 | +0.00% | 11.8B | 43.86 | $0.22 | +2.52% |
| IDKOY | $16.96 | -0.82% | 10.4B | 39.53 | $0.43 | +1.91% |
| KUNUF | $1.15 | +0.00% | 10B | 11.50 | $0.10 | +3.78% |
| MOHCY | $21.09 | +0.00% | 9.1B | 6.04 | $3.49 | +4.12% |
| KLYCY | $9.73 | +0.62% | 8.4B | 10.81 | $0.90 | +6.80% |
Stock Comparison
FGPR vs NTOIY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while NTOIY trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is 156.23. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NTOIY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check NTOIY's competition here
FGPR vs NTOIF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while NTOIF trades at $32.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is 149.32. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NTOIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to NTOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check NTOIF's competition here
FGPR vs JXHLY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while JXHLY trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 74.27. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check JXHLY's competition here
FGPR vs JXHGF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while JXHGF trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 73.18. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to JXHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check JXHGF's competition here
FGPR vs IDKOF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while IDKOF trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to IDKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check IDKOF's competition here
FGPR vs IDKOY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while IDKOY trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check IDKOY's competition here
FGPR vs KUNUF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while KUNUF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to KUNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check KUNUF's competition here
FGPR vs MOHCY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while MOHCY trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check MOHCY's competition here
FGPR vs KLYCY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while KLYCY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to KLYCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check KLYCY's competition here
FGPR vs SAAFY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check SAAFY's competition here
FGPR vs DCCPF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while DCCPF trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check DCCPF's competition here
FGPR vs DCCPY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while DCCPY trades at $33.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 38.32. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check DCCPY's competition here
FGPR vs CTXAY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while CTXAY trades at $49.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 101.02. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to CTXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check CTXAY's competition here
FGPR vs PKIUF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while PKIUF trades at $28.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check PKIUF's competition here
FGPR vs TOIPF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while TOIPF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to TOIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check TOIPF's competition here
FGPR vs RBSFY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while RBSFY trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check RBSFY's competition here
FGPR vs PNADF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to PNADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check PNADF's competition here
FGPR vs SHIIY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check SHIIY's competition here
FGPR vs RUBSF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while RUBSF trades at $39.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to RUBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check RUBSF's competition here
FGPR vs CTXAF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to CTXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check CTXAF's competition here
FGPR vs TOIPY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while TOIPY trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to TOIPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check TOIPY's competition here
FGPR vs MOHCF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while MOHCF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to MOHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check MOHCF's competition here
FGPR vs OILRF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while OILRF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 58.14. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to OILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check OILRF's competition here
FGPR vs FJLLF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while FJLLF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to FJLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check FJLLF's competition here
FGPR vs CAOLF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while CAOLF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to CAOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check CAOLF's competition here
FGPR vs PKCPY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while PKCPY trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to PKCPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check PKCPY's competition here
FGPR vs FGPRB Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 971.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while FGPRB trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to FGPRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check FGPRB's competition here
FGPR vs IRPSY Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 714.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while IRPSY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to IRPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check IRPSY's competition here
FGPR vs TPHIF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to TPHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check TPHIF's competition here
FGPR vs NZRFF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 671.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while NZRFF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to NZRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check NZRFF's competition here
FGPR vs REGX Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to REGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check REGX's competition here
FGPR vs CLSZF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while CLSZF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to CLSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check CLSZF's competition here
FGPR vs BDCO Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while BDCO trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check BDCO's competition here
FGPR vs ISRJF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while ISRJF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to ISRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check ISRJF's competition here
FGPR vs LCNTU Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while LCNTU trades at $460.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to LCNTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check LCNTU's competition here
FGPR vs SRNW Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while SRNW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SRNW's ROE of -23.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to SRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check SRNW's competition here
FGPR vs WTLC Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to WTLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check WTLC's competition here
FGPR vs DVFI Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to DVFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check DVFI's competition here
FGPR vs BERI Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 23.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while BERI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BERI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check BERI's competition here
FGPR vs QREE Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while QREE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QREE's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check QREE's competition here
FGPR vs IAHL Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to IAHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check IAHL's competition here
FGPR vs ABLE Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 30. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check ABLE's competition here
FGPR vs LNKE Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to LNKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check LNKE's competition here
FGPR vs TOAOF Comparison April 2026
FGPR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGPR stands at 125.8M. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGPR is priced at $25.31, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGPR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.77, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, FGPR's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGPR is more volatile compared to TOAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGPR.Check TOAOF's competition here