The Alkaline Water Company Inc.
The Alkaline Water Company Inc. (WTER) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WTER) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTER | $0.02 | +5.41% | 247.5K | -0.01 | -$2.31 | N/A |
| KO | $68.68 | -0.71% | 293B | 24.15 | $2.82 | +2.92% |
| PEP | $142.44 | -0.70% | 193.8B | 25.79 | $5.49 | +3.87% |
| MNST | $60.90 | +0.40% | 58.7B | 39.61 | $1.52 | N/A |
| CCEP | $98.47 | -1.57% | 45.2B | 27.12 | $3.62 | +2.26% |
| KDP | $33.62 | +1.04% | 44.8B | 29.18 | $1.13 | +2.78% |
| KOF | $82.22 | -3.89% | 17.5B | 22.48 | $3.70 | +3.87% |
| CELH | $47.69 | +2.25% | 12.1B | 142.27 | $0.33 | N/A |
| PRMB | $28.60 | -1.40% | 10.7B | -257.50 | -$0.11 | +4.24% |
| COKE | $115.16 | -3.06% | 10.1B | 17.32 | $6.71 | +0.86% |
Stock Comparison
WTER vs KO Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 293B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while KO trades at $68.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check KO's competition here
WTER vs PEP Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 193.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while PEP trades at $142.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check PEP's competition here
WTER vs MNST Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while MNST trades at $60.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 39.61. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check MNST's competition here
WTER vs CCEP Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while CCEP trades at $98.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check CCEP's competition here
WTER vs KDP Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while KDP trades at $33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check KDP's competition here
WTER vs KOF Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while KOF trades at $82.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check KOF's competition here
WTER vs CELH Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while CELH trades at $47.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 142.27. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check CELH's competition here
WTER vs PRMB Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while PRMB trades at $28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -257.50. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check PRMB's competition here
WTER vs COKE Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while COKE trades at $115.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check COKE's competition here
WTER vs FIZZ Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while FIZZ trades at $46.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check FIZZ's competition here
WTER vs PRMW Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check PRMW's competition here
WTER vs AKO-B Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while AKO-B trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check AKO-B's competition here
WTER vs AKO-A Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while AKO-A trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check AKO-A's competition here
WTER vs COCO Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while COCO trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is more volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check COCO's competition here
WTER vs OTLY Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 449.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while OTLY trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check OTLY's competition here
WTER vs ZVIA Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 211.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while ZVIA trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -10.02. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check ZVIA's competition here
WTER vs SHOT Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while SHOT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -15.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check SHOT's competition here
WTER vs REED Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while REED trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to REED's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check REED's competition here
WTER vs BRFH Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while BRFH trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -14.38. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check BRFH's competition here
WTER vs NBEV Comparison July 2025
WTER plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTER stands at 247.5K. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTER is priced at $0.02, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTER currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, WTER's ROE is +11.11%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WTER is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTER.Check NBEV's competition here