Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. WMS Peers
See (WMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMS | $123.62 | +0.94% | 9.59B | 20.67 | $5.98 | +0.52% |
| TT | $421.87 | +1.37% | 94.08B | 34.75 | $12.14 | +0.82% |
| CARR | $74.65 | +1.65% | 64.00B | 49.77 | $1.50 | +1.11% |
| JCI | $96.00 | +0.76% | 63.17B | 45.07 | $2.13 | +1.53% |
| LII | $602.53 | +1.14% | 21.38B | 26.86 | $22.43 | +0.76% |
| CSL | $400.52 | -0.12% | 17.32B | 22.31 | $17.95 | +0.96% |
| MAS | $68.07 | -1.58% | 14.36B | 18.60 | $3.66 | +1.73% |
| BLDR | $123.88 | +4.99% | 13.69B | 15.88 | $7.80 | N/A |
| OC | $142.60 | -0.45% | 12.13B | 19.92 | $7.16 | +1.80% |
| AAON | $105.95 | +1.26% | 8.62B | 55.47 | $1.91 | +0.32% |
Stock Comparison
WMS vs TT Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 94.08B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while TT trades at $421.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs CARR Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 64.00B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while CARR trades at $74.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 49.77. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs JCI Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 63.17B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while JCI trades at $96.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 45.07. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs LII Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 21.38B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while LII trades at $602.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LII's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs CSL Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 17.32B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while CSL trades at $400.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs MAS Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 14.36B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while MAS trades at $68.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MAS's ROE of -4.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs BLDR Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 13.69B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while BLDR trades at $123.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs OC Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 12.13B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while OC trades at $142.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas OC's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs AAON Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while AAON trades at $105.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 55.47. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs FBHS Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.94B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs BECN Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.72B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs AZEK Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.47B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while AZEK trades at $51.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs SSD Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 6.96B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while SSD trades at $165.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs AWI Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while AWI trades at $157.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs FBIN Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 6.78B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while FBIN trades at $56.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs TREX Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 6.61B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while TREX trades at $61.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs IBP Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, IBP has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while IBP trades at $171.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas IBP's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to IBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to IBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs GMS Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while GMS trades at $77.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs DOOR Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs PGTI Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs ROCK Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while ROCK trades at $63.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs JBI Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while JBI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs APOG Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 903.89M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while APOG trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs NX Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 886.51M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while NX trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas NX's P/E ratio is 48.13. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs SWIM Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 786.65M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while SWIM trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is -45.07. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SWIM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs BXC Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 591.72M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while BXC trades at $73.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs ASPN Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 488.12M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while ASPN trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is 34.94. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs JELD Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 378.30M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while JELD trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JELD's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs AIRJW Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 298.40M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while AIRJW trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs PPIH Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 111.76M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while PPIH trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs CSTE Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 73.60M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while CSTE trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs PHOE Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 71.03M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while PHOE trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 54.81. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PHOE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs APT Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 49.76M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while APT trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is more volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs ILAG Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 7.51M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while ILAG trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs AEHL Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while AEHL trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs VIEW Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.34M. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.
WMS vs VIEWW Comparison
WMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMS stands at 9.59B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6772.00. Regarding current trading prices, WMS is priced at $123.62, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.67, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WMS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WMS is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMS.