Westmoreland Resource Partners, LP (WMLP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WMLP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMLP | $2.07 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HCC | $94.67 | -4.28% | 5B | 36.26 | $2.61 | +0.34% |
| CNR | $91.27 | -2.09% | 4.6B | -76.66 | -$1.19 | +0.44% |
| BTU | $27.13 | -3.74% | 3.3B | -27.67 | -$0.98 | +1.13% |
| ARLP | $25.37 | -0.67% | 3.3B | 13.35 | $1.90 | +9.57% |
| CEIX | $84.16 | +0.39% | 2.5B | 6.22 | $13.54 | +0.48% |
| AMR | $193.58 | -4.26% | 2.5B | -64.20 | -$3.02 | N/A |
| ARCH | $134.83 | +0.70% | 2.4B | 14.06 | $9.59 | +2.42% |
| METCL | $25.26 | +0.16% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | +0.48% |
| NRP | $103.73 | -0.74% | 1.4B | 12.21 | $8.51 | +3.01% |
Stock Comparison
WMLP vs HCC Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, HCC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while HCC trades at $94.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCC's P/E ratio is 36.26. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to HCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to HCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check HCC's competition here
WMLP vs CNR Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, CNR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while CNR trades at $91.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNR's P/E ratio is -76.66. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to CNR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to CNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check CNR's competition here
WMLP vs BTU Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, BTU has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while BTU trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTU's P/E ratio is -27.67. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to BTU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to BTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check BTU's competition here
WMLP vs ARLP Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, ARLP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while ARLP trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARLP's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to ARLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to ARLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check ARLP's competition here
WMLP vs CEIX Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, CEIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while CEIX trades at $84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEIX's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to CEIX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to CEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check CEIX's competition here
WMLP vs AMR Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, AMR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while AMR trades at $193.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMR's P/E ratio is -64.20. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to AMR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is less volatile compared to AMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check AMR's competition here
WMLP vs ARCH Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, ARCH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while ARCH trades at $134.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARCH's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to ARCH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is less volatile compared to ARCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check ARCH's competition here
WMLP vs METCL Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, METCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while METCL trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas METCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to METCL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to METCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check METCL's competition here
WMLP vs NRP Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, NRP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while NRP trades at $103.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRP's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to NRP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to NRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check NRP's competition here
WMLP vs METCB Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, METCB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while METCB trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas METCB's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to METCB's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to METCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check METCB's competition here
WMLP vs METCZ Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, METCZ has a market cap of 820.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while METCZ trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas METCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to METCZ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to METCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check METCZ's competition here
WMLP vs METC Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, METC has a market cap of 796.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while METC trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas METC's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to METC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is less volatile compared to METC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check METC's competition here
WMLP vs HNRG Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, HNRG has a market cap of 763M. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while HNRG trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNRG's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to HNRG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is less volatile compared to HNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check HNRG's competition here
WMLP vs SXC Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, SXC has a market cap of 762.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while SXC trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXC's P/E ratio is -11.68. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to SXC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to SXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check SXC's competition here
WMLP vs NC Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, NC has a market cap of 393.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while NC trades at $52.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NC's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to NC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to NC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check NC's competition here
WMLP vs AREC Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, AREC has a market cap of 225.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while AREC trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AREC's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to AREC's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is less volatile compared to AREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check AREC's competition here
WMLP vs AHGP Comparison June 2026
WMLP plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WMLP stands at 0. In comparison, AHGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WMLP is priced at $2.07, while AHGP trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WMLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WMLP's ROE is +1.06%, compared to AHGP's ROE of -11.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WMLP is more volatile compared to AHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WMLP.Check AHGP's competition here