Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMR | $177.73 | -1.09% | 2.3B | -60.45 | -$3.02 | N/A |
| HCC | $85.26 | +0.14% | 4.5B | 32.81 | $2.61 | +0.37% |
| CNR | $83.85 | +1.30% | 4.2B | -70.45 | -$1.19 | +0.48% |
| ARLP | $25.41 | +1.11% | 3.3B | 13.37 | $1.90 | +9.43% |
| BTU | $23.66 | -0.46% | 2.9B | -24.32 | -$0.98 | +1.25% |
| CEIX | $84.16 | +0.39% | 2.5B | 6.22 | $13.54 | +0.48% |
| ARCH | $134.83 | +0.70% | 2.4B | 14.06 | $9.59 | +2.42% |
| METCZ | $25.36 | -0.08% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.50% |
| METCL | $25.26 | +0.16% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | +0.50% |
| NRP | $103.37 | -3.30% | 1.4B | 12.53 | $8.51 | +2.92% |
Stock Comparison
AMR vs HCC Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HCC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while HCC trades at $85.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas HCC's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to HCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check HCC's competition here
AMR vs CNR Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CNR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while CNR trades at $83.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas CNR's P/E ratio is -70.45. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CNR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to CNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check CNR's competition here
AMR vs ARLP Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ARLP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while ARLP trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas ARLP's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to ARLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check ARLP's competition here
AMR vs BTU Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BTU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while BTU trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas BTU's P/E ratio is -24.32. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BTU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to BTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check BTU's competition here
AMR vs CEIX Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CEIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while CEIX trades at $84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas CEIX's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEIX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to CEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check CEIX's competition here
AMR vs ARCH Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ARCH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while ARCH trades at $134.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas ARCH's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARCH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is less volatile compared to ARCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check ARCH's competition here
AMR vs METCZ Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, METCZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while METCZ trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas METCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to METCZ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to METCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check METCZ's competition here
AMR vs METCL Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, METCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while METCL trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas METCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to METCL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to METCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check METCL's competition here
AMR vs NRP Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NRP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while NRP trades at $103.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas NRP's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to NRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check NRP's competition here
AMR vs HNRG Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HNRG has a market cap of 862.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while HNRG trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas HNRG's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HNRG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to HNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check HNRG's competition here
AMR vs METCB Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, METCB has a market cap of 827.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while METCB trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas METCB's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to METCB's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to METCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check METCB's competition here
AMR vs METC Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, METC has a market cap of 751.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while METC trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas METC's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to METC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to METC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check METC's competition here
AMR vs SXC Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SXC has a market cap of 658.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while SXC trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas SXC's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SXC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to SXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check SXC's competition here
AMR vs NC Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NC has a market cap of 364.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while NC trades at $49.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas NC's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to NC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check NC's competition here
AMR vs AREC Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AREC has a market cap of 210.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while AREC trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas AREC's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AREC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is less volatile compared to AREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check AREC's competition here
AMR vs AHGP Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AHGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while AHGP trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas AHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AHGP's ROE of -11.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is more volatile compared to AHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check AHGP's competition here
AMR vs WMLP Comparison May 2026
AMR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMR stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMR is priced at $177.73, while WMLP trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMR currently has a P/E ratio of -60.45, whereas WMLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WMLP's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMR is less volatile compared to WMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMR.Check WMLP's competition here