Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BTU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTU | $27.14 | -3.43% | 3.4B | -28.76 | -$0.98 | +1.06% |
| HCC | $95.84 | -4.09% | 5.2B | 37.90 | $2.61 | +0.32% |
| CNR | $92.47 | -1.04% | 4.7B | -78.32 | -$1.19 | +0.43% |
| ARLP | $25.59 | -0.14% | 3.3B | 13.44 | $1.90 | +9.32% |
| AMR | $197.70 | -2.31% | 2.6B | -66.96 | -$3.02 | N/A |
| CEIX | $84.16 | +0.39% | 2.5B | 6.22 | $13.54 | +0.48% |
| ARCH | $134.83 | +0.70% | 2.4B | 14.06 | $9.59 | +2.42% |
| METCZ | $25.34 | +0.26% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| METCL | $25.26 | +0.16% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NRP | $103.55 | -1.86% | 1.4B | 12.23 | $8.51 | +2.99% |
Stock Comparison
BTU vs HCC Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HCC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while HCC trades at $95.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas HCC's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to HCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check HCC's competition here
BTU vs CNR Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CNR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while CNR trades at $92.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas CNR's P/E ratio is -78.32. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CNR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to CNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check CNR's competition here
BTU vs ARLP Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ARLP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while ARLP trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas ARLP's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to ARLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check ARLP's competition here
BTU vs AMR Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AMR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while AMR trades at $197.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas AMR's P/E ratio is -66.96. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to AMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check AMR's competition here
BTU vs CEIX Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CEIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while CEIX trades at $84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas CEIX's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CEIX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to CEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check CEIX's competition here
BTU vs ARCH Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ARCH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while ARCH trades at $134.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas ARCH's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARCH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to ARCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check ARCH's competition here
BTU vs METCZ Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, METCZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while METCZ trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas METCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to METCZ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to METCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check METCZ's competition here
BTU vs METCL Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, METCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while METCL trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas METCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to METCL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to METCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check METCL's competition here
BTU vs NRP Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NRP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while NRP trades at $103.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas NRP's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NRP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to NRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check NRP's competition here
BTU vs METCB Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, METCB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while METCB trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas METCB's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to METCB's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to METCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check METCB's competition here
BTU vs METC Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, METC has a market cap of 821.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while METC trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas METC's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to METC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to METC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check METC's competition here
BTU vs HNRG Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HNRG has a market cap of 797.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while HNRG trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas HNRG's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HNRG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to HNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check HNRG's competition here
BTU vs SXC Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SXC has a market cap of 772.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while SXC trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas SXC's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SXC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to SXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check SXC's competition here
BTU vs NC Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NC has a market cap of 394.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while NC trades at $52.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas NC's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to NC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check NC's competition here
BTU vs AREC Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AREC has a market cap of 230.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while AREC trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas AREC's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AREC's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to AREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check AREC's competition here
BTU vs WMLP Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while WMLP trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas WMLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WMLP's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is less volatile compared to WMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check WMLP's competition here
BTU vs AHGP Comparison June 2026
BTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTU stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AHGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTU is priced at $27.14, while AHGP trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTU currently has a P/E ratio of -28.76, whereas AHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTU's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AHGP's ROE of -11.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BTU is more volatile compared to AHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTU.Check AHGP's competition here