Core Natural Resources, Inc.
Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNR | $83.83 | -0.05% | 4.2B | -70.42 | -$1.19 | +0.48% |
| HCC | $85.01 | -0.69% | 4.5B | 32.34 | $2.63 | +0.38% |
| ARLP | $25.22 | -0.71% | 3.2B | 13.27 | $1.90 | +9.49% |
| BTU | $23.74 | -0.34% | 2.9B | -24.21 | -$0.98 | +1.26% |
| CEIX | $84.16 | +0.39% | 2.5B | 6.22 | $13.54 | +0.48% |
| ARCH | $134.83 | +0.70% | 2.4B | 14.06 | $9.59 | +2.42% |
| AMR | $176.58 | -3.14% | 2.2B | -58.59 | -$3.02 | N/A |
| METCZ | $25.33 | -0.02% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.51% |
| METCL | $25.26 | +0.16% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | +0.51% |
| NRP | $102.50 | -3.65% | 1.4B | 12.02 | $8.51 | +3.77% |
Stock Comparison
CNR vs HCC Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, HCC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while HCC trades at $85.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas HCC's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to HCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check HCC's competition here
CNR vs ARLP Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ARLP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while ARLP trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas ARLP's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to ARLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check ARLP's competition here
CNR vs BTU Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BTU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while BTU trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas BTU's P/E ratio is -24.21. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BTU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to BTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check BTU's competition here
CNR vs CEIX Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CEIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while CEIX trades at $84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas CEIX's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEIX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to CEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check CEIX's competition here
CNR vs ARCH Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ARCH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while ARCH trades at $134.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas ARCH's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARCH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to ARCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check ARCH's competition here
CNR vs AMR Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AMR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while AMR trades at $176.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas AMR's P/E ratio is -58.59. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to AMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check AMR's competition here
CNR vs METCZ Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, METCZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while METCZ trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas METCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to METCZ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to METCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check METCZ's competition here
CNR vs METCL Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, METCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while METCL trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas METCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to METCL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to METCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check METCL's competition here
CNR vs NRP Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, NRP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while NRP trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas NRP's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to NRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check NRP's competition here
CNR vs HNRG Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, HNRG has a market cap of 848.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while HNRG trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas HNRG's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HNRG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to HNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check HNRG's competition here
CNR vs METCB Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, METCB has a market cap of 819.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while METCB trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas METCB's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to METCB's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to METCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check METCB's competition here
CNR vs METC Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, METC has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while METC trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas METC's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to METC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to METC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check METC's competition here
CNR vs SXC Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SXC has a market cap of 657.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while SXC trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas SXC's P/E ratio is -10.06. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SXC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to SXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check SXC's competition here
CNR vs NC Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, NC has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while NC trades at $48.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas NC's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to NC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check NC's competition here
CNR vs AREC Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AREC has a market cap of 196.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while AREC trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas AREC's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AREC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to AREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check AREC's competition here
CNR vs AHGP Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AHGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while AHGP trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas AHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AHGP's ROE of -11.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to AHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check AHGP's competition here
CNR vs WMLP Comparison May 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, WMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $83.83, while WMLP trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -70.42, whereas WMLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WMLP's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to WMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check WMLP's competition here