Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WH | $83.96 | -0.49% | 6.3B | 19.39 | $4.33 | +1.96% |
| MAR | $347.44 | +1.25% | 92.1B | 36.53 | $9.51 | +0.76% |
| HLT | $313.35 | +0.18% | 72.8B | 51.12 | $6.13 | +0.19% |
| IHG | $140.58 | -0.53% | 21.2B | 29.77 | $4.72 | +1.23% |
| HTHT | $54.52 | -0.05% | 16.8B | 31.70 | $1.72 | +3.23% |
| H | $168.10 | +2.49% | 16.1B | -300.27 | -$0.56 | +0.36% |
| ATAT | $40.93 | +2.58% | 5.7B | 26.75 | $1.53 | +1.84% |
| CHH | $107.43 | -1.40% | 5B | 13.26 | $8.11 | +1.07% |
| SHCO | $8.99 | -0.11% | 1.8B | -21.93 | -$0.41 | N/A |
| MCG | $6.58 | -0.60% | 1.3B | -6.21 | -$1.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WH vs MAR Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while MAR trades at $347.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 36.53. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check MAR's competition here
WH vs HLT Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while HLT trades at $313.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 51.12. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check HLT's competition here
WH vs IHG Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while IHG trades at $140.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 29.77. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check IHG's competition here
WH vs HTHT Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while HTHT trades at $54.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WH and HTHT have similar daily volatility (2.30).Check HTHT's competition here
WH vs H Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, H has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while H trades at $168.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas H's P/E ratio is -300.27. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to H's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check H's competition here
WH vs ATAT Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while ATAT trades at $40.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check ATAT's competition here
WH vs CHH Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while CHH trades at $107.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CHH's ROE of +6.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check CHH's competition here
WH vs SHCO Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while SHCO trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check SHCO's competition here
WH vs MCG Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check MCG's competition here
WH vs GHG Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GHG has a market cap of 137.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while GHG trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas GHG's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GHG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to GHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check GHG's competition here
WH vs INTG Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while INTG trades at $29.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -51.82. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check INTG's competition here
WH vs SONDW Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 33.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while SONDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check SONDW's competition here
WH vs LUXH Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while LUXH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to LUXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check LUXH's competition here
WH vs LUXHP Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LUXHP has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while LUXHP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas LUXHP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LUXHP's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to LUXHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check LUXHP's competition here
WH vs SOND Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while SOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to SOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check SOND's competition here
WH vs STAY Comparison February 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $83.96, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.39, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.35%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check STAY's competition here