GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GHG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHG | $1.13 | +0.00% | 114.3M | 4.71 | $0.24 | +5.31% |
| MAR | $393.61 | +0.56% | 103.8B | 41.26 | $9.54 | +0.71% |
| HLT | $342.59 | +0.58% | 78B | 52.30 | $6.55 | +0.18% |
| IHG | $162.97 | -0.23% | 24.2B | 33.53 | $4.86 | +1.14% |
| H | $194.08 | +0.19% | 18.5B | -554.51 | -$0.35 | +0.31% |
| HTHT | $43.71 | -1.00% | 13.4B | 18.68 | $2.34 | +4.74% |
| WH | $80.48 | +1.12% | 6B | 31.94 | $2.52 | +2.16% |
| CHH | $108.58 | +3.00% | 4.9B | 14.67 | $7.40 | +1.10% |
| ATAT | $33.27 | +0.45% | 4.6B | 17.24 | $1.93 | +2.69% |
| SHCO | $8.99 | -0.11% | 1.8B | -21.93 | -$0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GHG vs MAR Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while MAR trades at $393.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 41.26. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MAR's competition here
GHG vs HLT Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while HLT trades at $342.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 52.30. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HLT's competition here
GHG vs IHG Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while IHG trades at $162.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check IHG's competition here
GHG vs H Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, H has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while H trades at $194.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas H's P/E ratio is -554.51. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to H's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check H's competition here
GHG vs HTHT Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while HTHT trades at $43.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HTHT's competition here
GHG vs WH Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while WH trades at $80.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to WH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check WH's competition here
GHG vs CHH Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while CHH trades at $108.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHH's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check CHH's competition here
GHG vs ATAT Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while ATAT trades at $33.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check ATAT's competition here
GHG vs SHCO Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while SHCO trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SHCO's competition here
GHG vs MCG Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MCG's competition here
GHG vs INTG Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while INTG trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -361.56. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check INTG's competition here
GHG vs SONDW Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 33.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while SONDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SONDW's competition here
GHG vs SOND Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while SOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SOND's competition here
GHG vs HOT Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, HOT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while HOT trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas HOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HOT's competition here
GHG vs STAY Comparison June 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 114.3M. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.13, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.71, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check STAY's competition here