GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GHG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHG | $1.17 | -0.85% | 119.2M | 2.84 | $0.42 | +5.17% |
| MAR | $377.88 | +1.81% | 98.2B | 35.75 | $10.42 | +0.74% |
| HLT | $337.86 | +1.42% | 76.9B | 40.20 | $8.40 | +0.18% |
| IHG | $165.81 | +1.44% | 24.3B | 29.38 | $5.59 | +1.12% |
| H | $192.07 | +2.49% | 18.1B | 59.50 | $3.19 | +0.31% |
| HTHT | $41.09 | -1.84% | 12.6B | 17.58 | $2.33 | +5.13% |
| WH | $79.10 | +2.51% | 6B | 17.06 | $4.68 | +2.11% |
| CHH | $111.09 | +4.42% | 5B | 16.39 | $6.69 | +1.05% |
| ATAT | $32.14 | +0.93% | 4.4B | 17.02 | $1.86 | +2.84% |
| HGV | $50.73 | +3.34% | 4B | 16.72 | $3.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GHG vs MAR Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while MAR trades at $377.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MAR's competition here
GHG vs HLT Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while HLT trades at $337.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HLT's competition here
GHG vs IHG Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while IHG trades at $165.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 29.38. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check IHG's competition here
GHG vs H Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, H has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while H trades at $192.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas H's P/E ratio is 59.50. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to H's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check H's competition here
GHG vs HTHT Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while HTHT trades at $41.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HTHT's competition here
GHG vs WH Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while WH trades at $79.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to WH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check WH's competition here
GHG vs CHH Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while CHH trades at $111.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHH's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check CHH's competition here
GHG vs ATAT Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while ATAT trades at $32.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check ATAT's competition here
GHG vs HGV Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while HGV trades at $50.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HGV's competition here
GHG vs SHCO Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while SHCO trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHCO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SHCO's competition here
GHG vs MCG Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MCG's competition here
GHG vs SEG Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while SEG trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SEG's competition here
GHG vs INTG Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while INTG trades at $40.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -465.22. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check INTG's competition here
GHG vs NTRP Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while NTRP trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check NTRP's competition here
GHG vs SONDW Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 33.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while SONDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SONDW's competition here
GHG vs SOND Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while SOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SOND's competition here
GHG vs STAY Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check STAY's competition here
GHG vs HOT Comparison July 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 119.2M. In comparison, HOT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.17, while HOT trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 2.84, whereas HOT's P/E ratio is 73.96. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HOT's competition here