GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd.
GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GHG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHG | $1.23 | +0.41% | 123.6M | 4.69 | $0.26 | +4.88% |
| MAR | $358.33 | +1.24% | 95.8B | 38.03 | $9.51 | +0.74% |
| HLT | $319.98 | +1.74% | 73.8B | 49.56 | $6.54 | +0.18% |
| IHG | $143.89 | +1.07% | 21.5B | 29.64 | $4.86 | +1.25% |
| H | $164.88 | +3.76% | 16B | -299.30 | -$0.56 | +0.35% |
| HTHT | $51.27 | -1.14% | 15.9B | 22.07 | $2.34 | +3.45% |
| WH | $81.53 | -3.04% | 6.1B | 32.54 | $2.50 | +2.01% |
| ATAT | $38.07 | +0.55% | 5.3B | 22.49 | $1.70 | +2.05% |
| CHH | $101.87 | -13.20% | 4.6B | 12.60 | $7.90 | +1.14% |
| SHCO | $8.99 | -0.11% | 1.8B | -21.93 | -$0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GHG vs MAR Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while MAR trades at $358.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MAR's competition here
GHG vs HLT Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while HLT trades at $319.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 49.56. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HLT's competition here
GHG vs IHG Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while IHG trades at $143.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check IHG's competition here
GHG vs H Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, H has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while H trades at $164.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas H's P/E ratio is -299.30. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to H's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check H's competition here
GHG vs HTHT Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while HTHT trades at $51.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HTHT's competition here
GHG vs WH Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while WH trades at $81.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG and WH have similar daily volatility (2.45).Check WH's competition here
GHG vs ATAT Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while ATAT trades at $38.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check ATAT's competition here
GHG vs CHH Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while CHH trades at $101.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHH's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check CHH's competition here
GHG vs SHCO Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while SHCO trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SHCO's competition here
GHG vs MCG Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check MCG's competition here
GHG vs INTG Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while INTG trades at $38.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -74.63. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check INTG's competition here
GHG vs SONDW Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 33.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while SONDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is less volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SONDW's competition here
GHG vs LUXH Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while LUXH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to LUXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check LUXH's competition here
GHG vs LUXHP Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, LUXHP has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while LUXHP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas LUXHP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUXHP's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to LUXHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check LUXHP's competition here
GHG vs SOND Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while SOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to SOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check SOND's competition here
GHG vs HOT Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, HOT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while HOT trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to HOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check HOT's competition here
GHG vs STAY Comparison May 2026
GHG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GHG stands at 123.6M. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GHG is priced at $1.23, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GHG currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GHG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GHG is more volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GHG.Check STAY's competition here