Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WH | $78.14 | -2.01% | 5.8B | 31.00 | $2.52 | +2.11% |
| MAR | $359.18 | +1.70% | 94.7B | 37.65 | $9.54 | +0.74% |
| HLT | $318.14 | +0.62% | 72.4B | 48.64 | $6.54 | +0.19% |
| IHG | $150.87 | +1.54% | 22.5B | 31.02 | $4.86 | +1.22% |
| H | $169.40 | +0.37% | 16.1B | -498.06 | -$0.34 | +0.35% |
| HTHT | $45.51 | -1.17% | 14B | 19.53 | $2.33 | +4.66% |
| ATAT | $36.98 | -3.32% | 5.1B | 19.06 | $1.94 | +2.11% |
| CHH | $106.65 | -0.27% | 4.9B | 14.42 | $7.40 | +1.08% |
| SHCO | $8.99 | -0.11% | 1.8B | -21.93 | -$0.41 | N/A |
| MCG | $6.58 | -0.60% | 1.3B | -6.21 | -$1.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WH vs MAR Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while MAR trades at $359.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check MAR's competition here
WH vs HLT Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while HLT trades at $318.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 48.64. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check HLT's competition here
WH vs IHG Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while IHG trades at $150.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check IHG's competition here
WH vs H Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, H has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while H trades at $169.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas H's P/E ratio is -498.06. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to H's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check H's competition here
WH vs HTHT Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while HTHT trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check HTHT's competition here
WH vs ATAT Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while ATAT trades at $36.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check ATAT's competition here
WH vs CHH Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while CHH trades at $106.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CHH's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check CHH's competition here
WH vs SHCO Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while SHCO trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check SHCO's competition here
WH vs MCG Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check MCG's competition here
WH vs GHG Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GHG has a market cap of 119.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while GHG trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas GHG's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to GHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check GHG's competition here
WH vs INTG Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while INTG trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -416.67. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check INTG's competition here
WH vs SONDW Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 33.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while SONDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is less volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check SONDW's competition here
WH vs LUXH Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while LUXH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to LUXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check LUXH's competition here
WH vs LUXHP Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LUXHP has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while LUXHP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas LUXHP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LUXHP's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to LUXHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check LUXHP's competition here
WH vs SOND Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while SOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to SOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check SOND's competition here
WH vs STAY Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check STAY's competition here
WH vs HOT Comparison May 2026
WH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WH stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HOT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WH is priced at $78.14, while HOT trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WH currently has a P/E ratio of 31.00, whereas HOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WH's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HOT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WH is more volatile compared to HOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WH.Check HOT's competition here