LuxUrban Hotels Inc. 13.00% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
LuxUrban Hotels Inc. 13.00% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (LUXHP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LUXHP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUXHP | $0.01 | +0.00% | 18.2K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MAR | $369.08 | -0.18% | 97.7B | 38.80 | $9.55 | +0.72% |
| HLT | $321.12 | -0.85% | 73.5B | 49.27 | $6.55 | +0.19% |
| IHG | $153.17 | -1.24% | 22.9B | 31.70 | $4.86 | +1.19% |
| H | $176.03 | +1.64% | 16.7B | -501.94 | -$0.35 | +0.34% |
| HTHT | $44.86 | -3.72% | 14.2B | 19.98 | $2.32 | +4.53% |
| WH | $78.84 | -2.55% | 6B | 32.04 | $2.52 | +2.05% |
| CHH | $112.52 | +0.23% | 5.1B | 15.06 | $7.40 | +1.03% |
| ATAT | $33.94 | -8.64% | 4.9B | 18.45 | $1.94 | +2.18% |
| SHCO | $8.99 | -0.11% | 1.8B | -21.93 | -$0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LUXHP vs MAR Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while MAR trades at $369.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 38.80. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check MAR's competition here
LUXHP vs HLT Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while HLT trades at $321.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 49.27. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check HLT's competition here
LUXHP vs IHG Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while IHG trades at $153.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check IHG's competition here
LUXHP vs H Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, H has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while H trades at $176.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H's P/E ratio is -501.94. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to H's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check H's competition here
LUXHP vs HTHT Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while HTHT trades at $44.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check HTHT's competition here
LUXHP vs WH Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while WH trades at $78.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to WH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check WH's competition here
LUXHP vs CHH Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while CHH trades at $112.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to CHH's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check CHH's competition here
LUXHP vs ATAT Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while ATAT trades at $33.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check ATAT's competition here
LUXHP vs SHCO Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while SHCO trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check SHCO's competition here
LUXHP vs MCG Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check MCG's competition here
LUXHP vs GHG Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, GHG has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while GHG trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHG's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to GHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to GHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check GHG's competition here
LUXHP vs INTG Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while INTG trades at $40.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -416.33. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check INTG's competition here
LUXHP vs SONDW Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 33.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while SONDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check SONDW's competition here
LUXHP vs LUXH Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while LUXH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP and LUXH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LUXH's competition here
LUXHP vs SOND Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while SOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP and SOND have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOND's competition here
LUXHP vs STAY Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP is less volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUXHP.Check STAY's competition here
LUXHP vs HOT Comparison May 2026
LUXHP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUXHP stands at 18.2K. In comparison, HOT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUXHP is priced at $0.01, while HOT trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUXHP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUXHP's ROE is +23.13%, compared to HOT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LUXHP and HOT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOT's competition here