Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide LLC
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide LLC (HOT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HOT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOT | $77.05 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | +1.46% |
| MAR | $358.33 | +1.24% | 95.8B | 38.03 | $9.51 | +0.74% |
| HLT | $319.98 | +1.74% | 73.8B | 49.56 | $6.54 | +0.18% |
| IHG | $143.89 | +1.07% | 21.5B | 29.64 | $4.86 | +1.25% |
| H | $164.88 | +3.76% | 16B | -299.30 | -$0.56 | +0.35% |
| HTHT | $51.27 | -1.14% | 15.9B | 22.07 | $2.34 | +3.45% |
| WH | $81.53 | -3.04% | 6.1B | 32.54 | $2.50 | +2.01% |
| ATAT | $38.07 | +0.55% | 5.3B | 22.49 | $1.70 | +2.05% |
| CHH | $101.87 | -13.20% | 4.6B | 12.60 | $7.90 | +1.14% |
| SHCO | $8.99 | -0.11% | 1.8B | -21.93 | -$0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HOT vs MAR Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while MAR trades at $358.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check MAR's competition here
HOT vs HLT Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while HLT trades at $319.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 49.56. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check HLT's competition here
HOT vs IHG Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while IHG trades at $143.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check IHG's competition here
HOT vs H Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, H has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while H trades at $164.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H's P/E ratio is -299.30. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to H's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check H's competition here
HOT vs HTHT Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while HTHT trades at $51.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check HTHT's competition here
HOT vs WH Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while WH trades at $81.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to WH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check WH's competition here
HOT vs ATAT Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while ATAT trades at $38.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check ATAT's competition here
HOT vs CHH Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while CHH trades at $101.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CHH's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check CHH's competition here
HOT vs SHCO Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while SHCO trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check SHCO's competition here
HOT vs MCG Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check MCG's competition here
HOT vs GHG Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, GHG has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while GHG trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHG's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GHG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to GHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check GHG's competition here
HOT vs INTG Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while INTG trades at $38.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -74.63. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check INTG's competition here
HOT vs SONDW Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 33.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while SONDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check SONDW's competition here
HOT vs LUXH Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while LUXH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT and LUXH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LUXH's competition here
HOT vs LUXHP Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, LUXHP has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while LUXHP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXHP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LUXHP's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT and LUXHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LUXHP's competition here
HOT vs SOND Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while SOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT and SOND have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOND's competition here
HOT vs STAY Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check STAY's competition here