Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide LLC
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide LLC (HOT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HOT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOT | $77.05 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | +1.46% |
| MAR | $369.75 | +3.08% | 97.5B | 38.72 | $9.55 | +0.72% |
| HLT | $323.87 | +2.69% | 73.7B | 49.44 | $6.55 | +0.18% |
| IHG | $155.10 | +3.40% | 23.1B | 31.87 | $4.86 | +1.19% |
| H | $173.19 | +5.35% | 16.5B | -509.38 | -$0.34 | +0.35% |
| HTHT | $46.59 | +1.35% | 14.3B | 20.08 | $2.32 | +4.54% |
| WH | $80.90 | +4.70% | 6.1B | 32.08 | $2.52 | +2.05% |
| ATAT | $37.15 | +1.98% | 5.1B | 19.15 | $1.94 | +2.11% |
| CHH | $112.26 | +5.75% | 5.1B | 15.17 | $7.40 | +1.02% |
| SHCO | $8.99 | -0.11% | 1.8B | -21.93 | -$0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HOT vs MAR Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 97.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while MAR trades at $369.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 38.72. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check MAR's competition here
HOT vs HLT Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, HLT has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while HLT trades at $323.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLT's P/E ratio is 49.44. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to HLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check HLT's competition here
HOT vs IHG Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while IHG trades at $155.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check IHG's competition here
HOT vs H Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, H has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while H trades at $173.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H's P/E ratio is -509.38. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to H's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check H's competition here
HOT vs HTHT Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while HTHT trades at $46.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check HTHT's competition here
HOT vs WH Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while WH trades at $80.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to WH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check WH's competition here
HOT vs ATAT Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while ATAT trades at $37.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check ATAT's competition here
HOT vs CHH Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while CHH trades at $112.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CHH's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check CHH's competition here
HOT vs SHCO Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while SHCO trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check SHCO's competition here
HOT vs MCG Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check MCG's competition here
HOT vs GHG Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, GHG has a market cap of 115.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while GHG trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHG's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to GHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check GHG's competition here
HOT vs INTG Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while INTG trades at $37.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -414.33. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check INTG's competition here
HOT vs SONDW Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 33.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while SONDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check SONDW's competition here
HOT vs LUXH Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while LUXH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT and LUXH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LUXH's competition here
HOT vs LUXHP Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, LUXHP has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while LUXHP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXHP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LUXHP's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT and LUXHP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LUXHP's competition here
HOT vs SOND Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while SOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT and SOND have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOND's competition here
HOT vs STAY Comparison May 2026
HOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOT stands at 0. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOT is priced at $77.05, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HOT is less volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOT.Check STAY's competition here