Wells Fargo & Company
Wells Fargo & Company WFC Peers
See (WFC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFC | $76.22 | +0.83% | 248.03B | 13.71 | $5.56 | +2.10% |
| JPM-PC | $25.06 | +0.20% | 745.16B | 1.86 | $13.48 | +1.89% |
| JPM-PD | $24.27 | -0.10% | 744.88B | 1.80 | $13.48 | +1.89% |
| JPM | $267.59 | +0.04% | 743.66B | 13.13 | $20.38 | +1.89% |
| BAC-PL | $1,181.90 | +0.39% | 445.10B | 336.34 | $3.51 | +2.28% |
| BAC | $44.69 | +0.70% | 336.60B | 13.34 | $3.35 | +2.28% |
| BML-PJ | $22.11 | +0.02% | 336.60B | 6.29 | $3.51 | +2.28% |
| BAC-PB | $24.53 | +0.57% | 336.18B | 6.98 | $3.51 | +2.28% |
| BML-PH | $20.83 | +0.05% | 336.01B | 5.93 | $3.51 | +2.28% |
| BML-PL | $21.07 | -0.26% | 335.62B | 6.00 | $3.51 | +2.28% |
Stock Comparison
WFC vs JPM-PC Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 745.16B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while JPM-PC trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM-PD Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 744.88B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while JPM-PD trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 743.66B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while JPM trades at $267.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 445.10B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BAC-PL trades at $1,181.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 336.34. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 336.60B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BAC trades at $44.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BML-PJ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 336.60B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BML-PJ trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PB Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 336.18B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BAC-PB trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BML-PH Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 336.01B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BML-PH trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BML-PL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 335.62B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BML-PL trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PK Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 335.29B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BAC-PK trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PE Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 335.04B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BAC-PE trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BML-PG Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 333.77B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BML-PG trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 247.45B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while WFC-PL trades at $1,181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 244.41. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PC Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 246.48B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while WFC-PC trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 60.02. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs HSBC Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 207.61B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while HSBC trades at $58.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PQ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.85B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PY Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 187.35B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while WFC-PY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PR Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.20B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs RY Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 177.70B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while RY trades at $125.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PM Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 162.99B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BAC-PM trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs MUFG Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 155.80B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while MUFG trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PN Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 151.62B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BAC-PN trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PS Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 143.18B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BAC-PS trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs C Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 141.33B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while C trades at $75.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas C's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to C's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PO Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 131.73B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BAC-PO trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PQ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 127.18B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PP Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 124.16B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BAC-PP trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs C-PJ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.21B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs SAN Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 117.16B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while SAN trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs TD Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 112.59B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while TD trades at $64.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs UBS Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 105.26B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while UBS trades at $33.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs RY-PT Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.82B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs SMFG Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 93.94B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while SMFG trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BBVA Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 86.77B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BBVA trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BMO Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 74.97B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BMO trades at $102.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs ING Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 64.57B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while ING trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BNS Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 64.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BNS trades at $51.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs NU Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 62.86B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while NU trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs CM Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 62.34B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while CM trades at $66.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PZ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 62.30B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BCS Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 62.22B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while BCS trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PA Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 60.59B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while WFC-PA trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PD Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 55.29B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while WFC-PD trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM-PJ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 55.07B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM-PL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 53.55B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while JPM-PL trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM-PK Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 52.36B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while JPM-PK trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM-PM Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 49.13B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while JPM-PM trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs C-PK Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.12B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs NWG Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 27.44B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while NWG trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs EWBC Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 13.16B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while EWBC trades at $95.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs CS Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs NTB Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while NTB trades at $42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs TANNL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.30M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs FRC-PL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 248.03B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.16M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $76.22, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.