Wells Fargo & Company
Wells Fargo & Company WFC Peers
See (WFC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFC | $82.36 | +1.07% | 268B | 14.81 | $5.56 | +1.97% |
| JPM | $292.00 | +0.55% | 811.1B | 14.32 | $20.38 | +1.74% |
| JPM-PD | $24.79 | +0.04% | 796.9B | 1.84 | $13.48 | +1.74% |
| JPM-PC | $25.43 | +0.12% | 786.6B | 1.89 | $13.48 | +1.74% |
| BAC-PL | $1,209.99 | +0.27% | 455.9B | 344.47 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BAC | $48.71 | +1.16% | 366.8B | 14.54 | $3.35 | +2.16% |
| BML-PG | $20.86 | +0.72% | 362.8B | 5.94 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BML-PH | $20.31 | +0.49% | 360.1B | 5.78 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BML-PL | $20.54 | +0.54% | 358.7B | 5.83 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BML-PJ | $21.88 | +0.39% | 358B | 6.23 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
Stock Comparison
WFC vs JPM Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 811.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while JPM trades at $292.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM-PD Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 796.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while JPM-PD trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM-PC Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 786.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while JPM-PC trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 455.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BAC-PL trades at $1,209.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 344.47. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 366.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BAC trades at $48.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BML-PG Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 362.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BML-PG trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BML-PH Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 360.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BML-PH trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BML-PL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 358.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BML-PL trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BML-PJ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 358B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BML-PJ trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PB Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 348.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BAC-PB trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PK Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 346B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BAC-PK trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PE Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 343B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BAC-PE trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PC Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 261.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while WFC-PC trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 258.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while WFC-PL trades at $1,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 244.21. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs HSBC Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 212B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while HSBC trades at $60.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PQ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PY Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 192.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while WFC-PY trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs RY Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 185B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while RY trades at $131.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PR Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PM Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BAC-PM trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs C Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 162B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while C trades at $86.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas C's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to C's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs MUFG Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 158.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while MUFG trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PN Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 155.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BAC-PN trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PS Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BAC-PS trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PO Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 136.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BAC-PO trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PQ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 132.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs TD Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 130.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while TD trades at $74.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BAC-PP Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 129.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BAC-PP trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs SAN Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while SAN trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs C-PJ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs UBS Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while UBS trades at $34.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs RY-PT Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs SMFG Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while SMFG trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BBVA Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BBVA trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BMO Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 81B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BMO trades at $112.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BNS Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BNS trades at $55.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs ING Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while ING trades at $22.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs CM Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while CM trades at $71.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs NU Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while NU trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PZ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while WFC-PZ trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs BCS Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while BCS trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PA Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while WFC-PA trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WFC-PD Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while WFC-PD trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM-PJ Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while JPM-PJ trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM-PL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while JPM-PL trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM-PK Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while JPM-PK trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs JPM-PM Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while JPM-PM trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs C-PK Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs NWG Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while NWG trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs EWBC Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while EWBC trades at $107.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs CS Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs NTB Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while NTB trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs TANNL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs FRC-PL Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.
WFC vs WBK Comparison
WFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC stands at 268B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFC is priced at $82.36, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.81, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, WFC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC.