Wells Fargo & Company
Wells Fargo & Company WFC-PR Peers
See (WFC-PR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFC-PR | $24.99 | -0.04% | 184.2B | 5.17 | $4.83 | +2.00% |
| JPM | $289.91 | +0.98% | 805.6B | 14.22 | $20.38 | +1.75% |
| JPM-PD | $24.57 | +0.86% | 792.3B | 1.83 | $13.48 | +1.75% |
| JPM-PC | $25.21 | +0.16% | 782B | 1.88 | $13.48 | +1.75% |
| BAC-PL | $1,213.00 | +0.97% | 457.1B | 345.42 | $3.51 | +2.20% |
| BML-PG | $20.69 | +0.68% | 359.8B | 5.89 | $3.51 | +2.20% |
| BML-PH | $20.01 | -0.74% | 358.3B | 5.75 | $3.51 | +2.20% |
| BML-PJ | $21.65 | -0.92% | 357.8B | 6.22 | $3.51 | +2.20% |
| BAC | $47.32 | +0.42% | 356.1B | 14.11 | $3.35 | +2.20% |
| BML-PL | $20.22 | -1.03% | 354.8B | 5.77 | $3.51 | +2.20% |
Stock Comparison
WFC-PR vs JPM Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 805.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while JPM trades at $289.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs JPM-PD Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 792.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while JPM-PD trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs JPM-PC Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 782B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while JPM-PC trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BAC-PL Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 457.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BAC-PL trades at $1,213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 345.42. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BML-PG Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 359.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BML-PG trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BML-PH Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 358.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BML-PH trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BML-PJ Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 357.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BML-PJ trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BAC Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 356.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BAC trades at $47.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BML-PL Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 354.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BML-PL trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BAC-PK Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 347B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BAC-PK trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BAC-PB Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 344.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BAC-PB trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BAC-PE Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 341.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BAC-PE trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs WFC Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 260.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while WFC trades at $80.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs WFC-PL Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 257.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while WFC-PL trades at $1,174.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 243.33. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs WFC-PC Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 256.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while WFC-PC trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 60.76. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs HSBC Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while HSBC trades at $60.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs WFC-PQ Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs WFC-PY Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 190B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while WFC-PY trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs RY Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 185.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while RY trades at $131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BAC-PM Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 164.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BAC-PM trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs C Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 158.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while C trades at $85.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas C's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to C's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs MUFG Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while MUFG trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BAC-PN Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 152.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BAC-PN trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BAC-PS Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BAC-PS trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BAC-PO Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 135.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BAC-PO trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BAC-PQ Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 130.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs TD Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 128.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while TD trades at $73.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BAC-PP Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 127.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BAC-PP trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs SAN Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 123.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while SAN trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs C-PJ Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs UBS Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while UBS trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs RY-PT Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs SMFG Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 97.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while SMFG trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BBVA Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BBVA trades at $15.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BMO Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BMO trades at $110.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BNS Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BNS trades at $55.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs ING Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while ING trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs CM Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while CM trades at $70.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs NU Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while NU trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs BCS Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 65.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while BCS trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs WFC-PZ Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while WFC-PZ trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs WFC-PA Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while WFC-PA trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs JPM-PJ Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while JPM-PJ trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs WFC-PD Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while WFC-PD trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs JPM-PL Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while JPM-PL trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs JPM-PK Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while JPM-PK trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs JPM-PM Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while JPM-PM trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs C-PK Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs NWG Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while NWG trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs EWBC Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while EWBC trades at $100.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs CS Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs NTB Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while NTB trades at $44.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs TANNL Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs FRC-PL Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.
WFC-PR vs WBK Comparison
WFC-PR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PR stands at 184.2B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PR is priced at $24.99, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PR currently has a P/E ratio of 5.17, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, WFC-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PR is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PR.