V R Infraspace Ltd.
V R Infraspace Ltd. (VR.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VR.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VR.NS | ₹134.40 | +5.00% | 1.2B | 58.95 | ₹2.28 | N/A |
| DLF.NS | ₹586.70 | -0.21% | 1.5T | 32.87 | ₹17.85 | +1.02% |
| DLF.BO | ₹586.70 | -0.24% | 1.5T | 32.89 | ₹17.84 | +1.02% |
| LODHA.NS | ₹886.75 | +0.34% | 885.8B | 25.91 | ₹34.23 | +0.48% |
| LODHA.BO | ₹886.30 | +0.31% | 885.3B | 25.90 | ₹34.22 | +0.48% |
| OBEROIRLTY.BO | ₹1,659.90 | +0.46% | 603.5B | 24.09 | ₹68.89 | +0.48% |
| OBEROIRLTY.NS | ₹1,659.60 | +0.31% | 603.4B | 24.06 | ₹68.97 | +0.48% |
| GODREJPROP.BO | ₹1,733.00 | -0.10% | 522B | 33.60 | ₹51.57 | N/A |
| GODREJPROP.NS | ₹1,732.90 | -0.23% | 522B | 28.18 | ₹61.49 | N/A |
| ANANTRAJ.NS | ₹503.95 | -1.23% | 181.4B | 31.86 | ₹15.82 | +0.14% |
Stock Comparison
VR.NS vs DLF.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLF.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while DLF.NS trades at ₹586.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas DLF.NS's P/E ratio is 32.87. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DLF.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to DLF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check DLF.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs DLF.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLF.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while DLF.BO trades at ₹586.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas DLF.BO's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DLF.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to DLF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check DLF.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs LODHA.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LODHA.NS has a market cap of 885.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while LODHA.NS trades at ₹886.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas LODHA.NS's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LODHA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to LODHA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check LODHA.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs LODHA.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LODHA.BO has a market cap of 885.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while LODHA.BO trades at ₹886.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas LODHA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LODHA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to LODHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check LODHA.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.BO has a market cap of 603.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while OBEROIRLTY.BO trades at ₹1,659.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas OBEROIRLTY.BO's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.NS has a market cap of 603.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while OBEROIRLTY.NS trades at ₹1,659.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas OBEROIRLTY.NS's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs GODREJPROP.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.BO has a market cap of 522B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while GODREJPROP.BO trades at ₹1,733.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas GODREJPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GODREJPROP.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to GODREJPROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check GODREJPROP.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs GODREJPROP.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.NS has a market cap of 522B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while GODREJPROP.NS trades at ₹1,732.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas GODREJPROP.NS's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GODREJPROP.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to GODREJPROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check GODREJPROP.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs ANANTRAJ.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.NS has a market cap of 181.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ANANTRAJ.NS trades at ₹503.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ANANTRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ANANTRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs ANANTRAJ.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.BO has a market cap of 181.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ANANTRAJ.BO trades at ₹503.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ANANTRAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ANANTRAJ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs BRIGADE.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BRIGADE.BO has a market cap of 164.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while BRIGADE.BO trades at ₹672.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas BRIGADE.BO's P/E ratio is 2489.81. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BRIGADE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check BRIGADE.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs BRIGADE.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BRIGADE.NS has a market cap of 164.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while BRIGADE.NS trades at ₹672.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas BRIGADE.NS's P/E ratio is 2585.19. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BRIGADE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check BRIGADE.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs SOBHA.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SOBHA.BO has a market cap of 147.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SOBHA.BO trades at ₹1,381.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SOBHA.BO's P/E ratio is 103.56. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SOBHA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SOBHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SOBHA.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs SOBHA.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SOBHA.NS has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SOBHA.NS trades at ₹1,376.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SOBHA.NS's P/E ratio is 103.37. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SOBHA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SOBHA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SOBHA.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs SIGNATURE.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.NS has a market cap of 115.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SIGNATURE.NS trades at ₹820.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SIGNATURE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIGNATURE.NS's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SIGNATURE.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs SIGNATURE.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.BO has a market cap of 114.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SIGNATURE.BO trades at ₹817.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SIGNATURE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIGNATURE.BO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SIGNATURE.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs IBREALEST.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IBREALEST.BO has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while IBREALEST.BO trades at ₹150.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas IBREALEST.BO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IBREALEST.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check IBREALEST.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs IBREALEST.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IBREALEST.NS has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while IBREALEST.NS trades at ₹131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas IBREALEST.NS's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IBREALEST.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check IBREALEST.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs MAHLIFE.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.NS has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while MAHLIFE.NS trades at ₹341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas MAHLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MAHLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check MAHLIFE.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs MAHLIFE.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.BO has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while MAHLIFE.BO trades at ₹340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas MAHLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MAHLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check MAHLIFE.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs MAXESTATES.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.BO has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while MAXESTATES.BO trades at ₹428.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas MAXESTATES.BO's P/E ratio is 141.57. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MAXESTATES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is less volatile compared to MAXESTATES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check MAXESTATES.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs MAXESTATES.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.NS has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while MAXESTATES.NS trades at ₹428.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas MAXESTATES.NS's P/E ratio is 141.10. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MAXESTATES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to MAXESTATES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check MAXESTATES.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs KALPATARU.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KALPATARU.NS has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while KALPATARU.NS trades at ₹333.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas KALPATARU.NS's P/E ratio is 70.42. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KALPATARU.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to KALPATARU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check KALPATARU.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs DBREALTY.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DBREALTY.BO has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while DBREALTY.BO trades at ₹115.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas DBREALTY.BO's P/E ratio is 59.46. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DBREALTY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to DBREALTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check DBREALTY.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs DBREALTY.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DBREALTY.NS has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while DBREALTY.NS trades at ₹115.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas DBREALTY.NS's P/E ratio is 59.38. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DBREALTY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to DBREALTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check DBREALTY.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs GANESHHOU.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.BO has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while GANESHHOU.BO trades at ₹692.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas GANESHHOU.BO's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GANESHHOU.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check GANESHHOU.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs GANESHHOU.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.NS has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while GANESHHOU.NS trades at ₹690.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas GANESHHOU.NS's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GANESHHOU.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check GANESHHOU.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs GANESHHOUC.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.BO has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while GANESHHOUC.BO trades at ₹687.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas GANESHHOUC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GANESHHOUC.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs NIRLON.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NIRLON.BO has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while NIRLON.BO trades at ₹617.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas NIRLON.BO's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NIRLON.BO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to NIRLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check NIRLON.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs PURVA.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PURVA.BO has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while PURVA.BO trades at ₹225.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas PURVA.BO's P/E ratio is 83.94. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PURVA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to PURVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check PURVA.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs PURVA.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PURVA.NS has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while PURVA.NS trades at ₹225.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas PURVA.NS's P/E ratio is 84.18. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PURVA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to PURVA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check PURVA.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.BO has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while RUSTOMJEE.BO trades at ₹395.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas RUSTOMJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 63.74. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.NS has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while RUSTOMJEE.NS trades at ₹394.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas RUSTOMJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 63.70. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs GANESHHOUC.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.NS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while GANESHHOUC.NS trades at ₹584.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas GANESHHOUC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GANESHHOUC.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs AGIIL.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGIIL.NS has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while AGIIL.NS trades at ₹383.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas AGIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 55.93. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AGIIL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to AGIIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check AGIIL.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs IBULLSLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.BO has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while IBULLSLTD.BO trades at ₹19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas IBULLSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IBULLSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs IBULLSLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.NS has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while IBULLSLTD.NS trades at ₹19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas IBULLSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IBULLSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs SUNTECK.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SUNTECK.BO has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SUNTECK.BO trades at ₹288.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SUNTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUNTECK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SUNTECK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SUNTECK.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs SUNTECK.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SUNTECK.NS has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SUNTECK.NS trades at ₹288.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SUNTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUNTECK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SUNTECK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SUNTECK.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs TARC.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TARC.BO has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while TARC.BO trades at ₹131.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas TARC.BO's P/E ratio is -44.27. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TARC.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to TARC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check TARC.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs TARC.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TARC.NS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while TARC.NS trades at ₹130.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas TARC.NS's P/E ratio is -44.13. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TARC.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to TARC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check TARC.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs ASHIANA.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASHIANA.NS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ASHIANA.NS trades at ₹373.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ASHIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASHIANA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ASHIANA.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs ASHIANA.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASHIANA.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ASHIANA.BO trades at ₹372.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ASHIANA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASHIANA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ASHIANA.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs KESAR.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KESAR.BO has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while KESAR.BO trades at ₹1,248.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas KESAR.BO's P/E ratio is 125.02. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KESAR.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to KESAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check KESAR.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.BO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while KOLTEPATIL.BO trades at ₹395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas KOLTEPATIL.BO's P/E ratio is 67.41. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.NS has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while KOLTEPATIL.NS trades at ₹394.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas KOLTEPATIL.NS's P/E ratio is 67.16. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs MARATHON.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MARATHON.NS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while MARATHON.NS trades at ₹481.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas MARATHON.NS's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MARATHON.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to MARATHON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check MARATHON.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs MARATHON.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MARATHON.BO has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while MARATHON.BO trades at ₹480.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas MARATHON.BO's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MARATHON.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to MARATHON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check MARATHON.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs HUBTOWN.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.NS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while HUBTOWN.NS trades at ₹207.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas HUBTOWN.NS's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HUBTOWN.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to HUBTOWN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check HUBTOWN.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs HUBTOWN.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.BO has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while HUBTOWN.BO trades at ₹207.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas HUBTOWN.BO's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HUBTOWN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to HUBTOWN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check HUBTOWN.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs ARVSMART.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARVSMART.BO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ARVSMART.BO trades at ₹619.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ARVSMART.BO's P/E ratio is 38.88. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARVSMART.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ARVSMART.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs ARVSMART.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARVSMART.NS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ARVSMART.NS trades at ₹618.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ARVSMART.NS's P/E ratio is 38.83. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARVSMART.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ARVSMART.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs NATIONSTD.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NATIONSTD.BO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while NATIONSTD.BO trades at ₹1,213.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas NATIONSTD.BO's P/E ratio is 250.22. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NATIONSTD.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to NATIONSTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check NATIONSTD.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs AJMERA.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AJMERA.NS has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while AJMERA.NS trades at ₹119.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas AJMERA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AJMERA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to AJMERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check AJMERA.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs AJMERA.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AJMERA.BO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while AJMERA.BO trades at ₹119.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas AJMERA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AJMERA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to AJMERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check AJMERA.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs ALEMBICLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ALEMBICLTD.BO trades at ₹87.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ALEMBICLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ALEMBICLTD.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs ALEMBICLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.NS has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ALEMBICLTD.NS trades at ₹87.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ALEMBICLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALEMBICLTD.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ALEMBICLTD.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs ARKADE.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARKADE.NS has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ARKADE.NS trades at ₹113.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ARKADE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARKADE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ARKADE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ARKADE.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs MIIL.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MIIL.BO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while MIIL.BO trades at ₹766.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas MIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 2072.84. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MIIL.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to MIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check MIIL.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SHRIRAMPPS.NS trades at ₹84.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.BO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SHRIRAMPPS.BO trades at ₹83.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs OMAXE.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OMAXE.NS has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while OMAXE.NS trades at ₹74.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas OMAXE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to OMAXE.NS's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to OMAXE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check OMAXE.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs OMAXE.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OMAXE.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while OMAXE.BO trades at ₹74.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas OMAXE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to OMAXE.BO's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to OMAXE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check OMAXE.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs ASL.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ASL.BO trades at ₹310.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ASL.BO's P/E ratio is -1320.85. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ASL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ASL.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.NS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ARIHANTSUP.NS trades at ₹242.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ARIHANTSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ARIHANTSUP.BO trades at ₹242.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ARIHANTSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs SURAJEST.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SURAJEST.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SURAJEST.NS trades at ₹215.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SURAJEST.NS's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SURAJEST.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SURAJEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SURAJEST.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs AGIIL.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGIIL.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while AGIIL.BO trades at ₹383.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas AGIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 55.76. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AGIIL.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to AGIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check AGIIL.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs RDBRIL.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RDBRIL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while RDBRIL.BO trades at ₹53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas RDBRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 213.12. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RDBRIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to RDBRIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check RDBRIL.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs MCCHRLS-B.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MCCHRLS-B.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while MCCHRLS-B.BO trades at ₹680.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas MCCHRLS-B.BO's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check MCCHRLS-B.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs ARIHANT.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARIHANT.BO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ARIHANT.BO trades at ₹876.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ARIHANT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARIHANT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ARIHANT.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs ARIHANT.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARIHANT.NS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while ARIHANT.NS trades at ₹865.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas ARIHANT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARIHANT.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check ARIHANT.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs GEECEE.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GEECEE.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while GEECEE.NS trades at ₹330.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas GEECEE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GEECEE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to GEECEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check GEECEE.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs GEECEE.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GEECEE.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while GEECEE.BO trades at ₹329.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas GEECEE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GEECEE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to GEECEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check GEECEE.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs MODIS.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MODIS.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while MODIS.BO trades at ₹350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas MODIS.BO's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MODIS.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to MODIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check MODIS.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs HAZOOR.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HAZOOR.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while HAZOOR.BO trades at ₹26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas HAZOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HAZOOR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to HAZOOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check HAZOOR.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs OSWALAGRO.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while OSWALAGRO.BO trades at ₹45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas OSWALAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to OSWALAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs OSWALAGRO.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while OSWALAGRO.NS trades at ₹44.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas OSWALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to OSWALAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs PENINLAND.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PENINLAND.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while PENINLAND.NS trades at ₹16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas PENINLAND.NS's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PENINLAND.NS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to PENINLAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check PENINLAND.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs PENINLAND.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PENINLAND.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while PENINLAND.BO trades at ₹16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas PENINLAND.BO's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PENINLAND.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to PENINLAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check PENINLAND.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs NILASPACES.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NILASPACES.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while NILASPACES.BO trades at ₹12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas NILASPACES.BO's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NILASPACES.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to NILASPACES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check NILASPACES.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs NILASPACES.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NILASPACES.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while NILASPACES.NS trades at ₹12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas NILASPACES.NS's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NILASPACES.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to NILASPACES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check NILASPACES.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs PANSARI.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PANSARI.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while PANSARI.NS trades at ₹260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas PANSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PANSARI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to PANSARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check PANSARI.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs YOGI.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, YOGI.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while YOGI.BO trades at ₹168.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas YOGI.BO's P/E ratio is 36.49. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to YOGI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to YOGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check YOGI.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs SBGLP.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBGLP.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SBGLP.NS trades at ₹25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SBGLP.NS's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SBGLP.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SBGLP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SBGLP.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs SBGLP.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBGLP.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SBGLP.BO trades at ₹25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SBGLP.BO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SBGLP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SBGLP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SBGLP.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs EMAMIREAL.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while EMAMIREAL.BO trades at ₹86.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas EMAMIREAL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EMAMIREAL.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs EMAMIREAL.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while EMAMIREAL.NS trades at ₹86.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas EMAMIREAL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EMAMIREAL.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs RATNABHUMI.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RATNABHUMI.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while RATNABHUMI.BO trades at ₹253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas RATNABHUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 66.23. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RATNABHUMI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to RATNABHUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check RATNABHUMI.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs NILAINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while NILAINFRA.NS trades at ₹8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas NILAINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NILAINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to NILAINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check NILAINFRA.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs NILAINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while NILAINFRA.BO trades at ₹8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas NILAINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NILAINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to NILAINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check NILAINFRA.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs MERCANTILE.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MERCANTILE.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while MERCANTILE.BO trades at ₹25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas MERCANTILE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MERCANTILE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is less volatile compared to MERCANTILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check MERCANTILE.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs TULIVE.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TULIVE.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while TULIVE.BO trades at ₹1,233.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas TULIVE.BO's P/E ratio is -248.77. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TULIVE.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to TULIVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check TULIVE.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while KBCGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas KBCGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs SVGLOBAL.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SVGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while SVGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹136.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas SVGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.53. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SVGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to SVGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check SVGLOBAL.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while KBCGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas KBCGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is less volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs RVHL.NS Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RVHL.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while RVHL.NS trades at ₹39.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas RVHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RVHL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to RVHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check RVHL.NS's competition here
VR.NS vs RVHL.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RVHL.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while RVHL.BO trades at ₹38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas RVHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RVHL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to RVHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check RVHL.BO's competition here
VR.NS vs VGIL.BO Comparison May 2026
VR.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VR.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VGIL.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VR.NS is priced at ₹134.40, while VGIL.BO trades at ₹142.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.95, whereas VGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 167.94. In terms of profitability, VR.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VGIL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VR.NS is more volatile compared to VGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VR.NS.Check VGIL.BO's competition here