Hubtown Limited
Hubtown Limited (HUBTOWN.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HUBTOWN.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBTOWN.NS | ₹204.99 | -1.12% | 28.6B | 22.45 | ₹8.96 | N/A |
| DLF.BO | ₹607.70 | +2.31% | 1.5T | 32.80 | ₹17.90 | +1.02% |
| DLF.NS | ₹605.65 | +1.88% | 1.5T | 32.82 | ₹17.89 | +1.02% |
| LODHA.BO | ₹929.00 | +1.72% | 896.7B | 26.21 | ₹34.25 | +0.48% |
| LODHA.NS | ₹925.95 | +1.45% | 892.6B | 26.10 | ₹34.23 | +0.48% |
| OBEROIRLTY.BO | ₹1,696.25 | -0.06% | 606.8B | 27.09 | ₹61.61 | +0.48% |
| OBEROIRLTY.NS | ₹1,694.80 | -0.32% | 606.8B | 27.11 | ₹61.55 | +0.48% |
| GODREJPROP.NS | ₹1,880.60 | +0.98% | 551.8B | 34.86 | ₹52.55 | N/A |
| GODREJPROP.BO | ₹1,891.25 | +1.45% | 551.5B | 35.51 | ₹51.57 | N/A |
| BRIGADE.NS | ₹792.70 | -0.60% | 192.3B | 25.70 | ₹30.60 | +0.32% |
Stock Comparison
HUBTOWN.NS vs DLF.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, DLF.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while DLF.BO trades at ₹607.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas DLF.BO's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLF.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to DLF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check DLF.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs DLF.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, DLF.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while DLF.NS trades at ₹605.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas DLF.NS's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to DLF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check DLF.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs LODHA.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, LODHA.BO has a market cap of 896.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while LODHA.BO trades at ₹929.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas LODHA.BO's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LODHA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to LODHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check LODHA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs LODHA.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, LODHA.NS has a market cap of 892.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while LODHA.NS trades at ₹925.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas LODHA.NS's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LODHA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to LODHA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check LODHA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.BO has a market cap of 606.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while OBEROIRLTY.BO trades at ₹1,696.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas OBEROIRLTY.BO's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.NS has a market cap of 606.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while OBEROIRLTY.NS trades at ₹1,694.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas OBEROIRLTY.NS's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs GODREJPROP.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.NS has a market cap of 551.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while GODREJPROP.NS trades at ₹1,880.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas GODREJPROP.NS's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GODREJPROP.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJPROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check GODREJPROP.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs GODREJPROP.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.BO has a market cap of 551.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while GODREJPROP.BO trades at ₹1,891.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas GODREJPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 35.51. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GODREJPROP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJPROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check GODREJPROP.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs BRIGADE.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, BRIGADE.NS has a market cap of 192.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while BRIGADE.NS trades at ₹792.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas BRIGADE.NS's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRIGADE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check BRIGADE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs BRIGADE.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, BRIGADE.BO has a market cap of 192.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while BRIGADE.BO trades at ₹793.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas BRIGADE.BO's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRIGADE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check BRIGADE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ANANTRAJ.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.BO has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ANANTRAJ.BO trades at ₹509.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ANANTRAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANANTRAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ANANTRAJ.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.NS has a market cap of 174.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ANANTRAJ.NS trades at ₹508.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ANANTRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANANTRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SOBHA.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SOBHA.NS has a market cap of 153.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SOBHA.NS trades at ₹1,438.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SOBHA.NS's P/E ratio is 107.27. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOBHA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to SOBHA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SOBHA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SOBHA.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SOBHA.BO has a market cap of 152.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SOBHA.BO trades at ₹1,441.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SOBHA.BO's P/E ratio is 107.09. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOBHA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to SOBHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SOBHA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SIGNATURE.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.BO has a market cap of 121.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SIGNATURE.BO trades at ₹872.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SIGNATURE.BO's P/E ratio is 3332.50. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIGNATURE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SIGNATURE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SIGNATURE.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.NS has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SIGNATURE.NS trades at ₹871.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SIGNATURE.NS's P/E ratio is 3326.54. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIGNATURE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SIGNATURE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs IBREALEST.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, IBREALEST.BO has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while IBREALEST.BO trades at ₹150.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas IBREALEST.BO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IBREALEST.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check IBREALEST.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs IBREALEST.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, IBREALEST.NS has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while IBREALEST.NS trades at ₹131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas IBREALEST.NS's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IBREALEST.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check IBREALEST.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs MAHLIFE.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.BO has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while MAHLIFE.BO trades at ₹334.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas MAHLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAHLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check MAHLIFE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs MAHLIFE.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.NS has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while MAHLIFE.NS trades at ₹335.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas MAHLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAHLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check MAHLIFE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs KALPATARU.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, KALPATARU.NS has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while KALPATARU.NS trades at ₹328.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas KALPATARU.NS's P/E ratio is -64.87. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KALPATARU.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to KALPATARU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check KALPATARU.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs MAXESTATES.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.BO has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while MAXESTATES.BO trades at ₹400.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas MAXESTATES.BO's P/E ratio is 130.21. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAXESTATES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to MAXESTATES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check MAXESTATES.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs MAXESTATES.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.NS has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while MAXESTATES.NS trades at ₹405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas MAXESTATES.NS's P/E ratio is 128.75. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAXESTATES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to MAXESTATES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check MAXESTATES.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs DBREALTY.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, DBREALTY.NS has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while DBREALTY.NS trades at ₹124.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas DBREALTY.NS's P/E ratio is 53.30. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DBREALTY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check DBREALTY.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs GANESHHOU.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.BO has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while GANESHHOU.BO trades at ₹652.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas GANESHHOU.BO's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANESHHOU.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check GANESHHOU.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs GANESHHOUC.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.BO has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while GANESHHOUC.BO trades at ₹647.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas GANESHHOUC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANESHHOUC.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs GANESHHOU.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.NS has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while GANESHHOU.NS trades at ₹653.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas GANESHHOU.NS's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANESHHOU.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check GANESHHOU.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs DBREALTY.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, DBREALTY.BO has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while DBREALTY.BO trades at ₹123.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas DBREALTY.BO's P/E ratio is 51.80. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DBREALTY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check DBREALTY.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs NIRLON.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, NIRLON.BO has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while NIRLON.BO trades at ₹570.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas NIRLON.BO's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIRLON.BO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to NIRLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check NIRLON.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs PURVA.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, PURVA.NS has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while PURVA.NS trades at ₹218.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas PURVA.NS's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PURVA.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to PURVA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check PURVA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs PURVA.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, PURVA.BO has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while PURVA.BO trades at ₹218.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas PURVA.BO's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PURVA.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to PURVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check PURVA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SUNTECK.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SUNTECK.NS has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SUNTECK.NS trades at ₹336.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SUNTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUNTECK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to SUNTECK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SUNTECK.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SUNTECK.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SUNTECK.BO has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SUNTECK.BO trades at ₹337.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SUNTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUNTECK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to SUNTECK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SUNTECK.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.BO has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while RUSTOMJEE.BO trades at ₹403.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas RUSTOMJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 54.78. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.NS has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while RUSTOMJEE.NS trades at ₹402.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas RUSTOMJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 54.58. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs AGIIL.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, AGIIL.NS has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while AGIIL.NS trades at ₹409.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas AGIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 57.47. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGIIL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to AGIIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check AGIIL.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs GANESHHOUC.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.NS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while GANESHHOUC.NS trades at ₹584.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas GANESHHOUC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANESHHOUC.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs IBULLSLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.NS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while IBULLSLTD.NS trades at ₹21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas IBULLSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IBULLSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs IBULLSLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.BO has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while IBULLSLTD.BO trades at ₹21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas IBULLSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IBULLSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs TARC.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, TARC.BO has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while TARC.BO trades at ₹137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas TARC.BO's P/E ratio is -45.32. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TARC.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to TARC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check TARC.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs TARC.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, TARC.NS has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while TARC.NS trades at ₹137.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas TARC.NS's P/E ratio is -45.20. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TARC.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to TARC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check TARC.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs KESAR.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, KESAR.BO has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while KESAR.BO trades at ₹1,249.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas KESAR.BO's P/E ratio is 125.46. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KESAR.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to KESAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check KESAR.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ASHIANA.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ASHIANA.BO has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ASHIANA.BO trades at ₹345.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ASHIANA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASHIANA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ASHIANA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while KOLTEPATIL.BO trades at ₹396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas KOLTEPATIL.BO's P/E ratio is 66.27. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ASHIANA.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ASHIANA.NS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ASHIANA.NS trades at ₹346.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ASHIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASHIANA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ASHIANA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.NS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while KOLTEPATIL.NS trades at ₹395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas KOLTEPATIL.NS's P/E ratio is 65.53. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs MARATHON.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, MARATHON.NS has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while MARATHON.NS trades at ₹482.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas MARATHON.NS's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MARATHON.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to MARATHON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check MARATHON.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs MARATHON.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, MARATHON.BO has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while MARATHON.BO trades at ₹481.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas MARATHON.BO's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MARATHON.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to MARATHON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check MARATHON.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs HUBTOWN.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while HUBTOWN.BO trades at ₹206.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas HUBTOWN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUBTOWN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to HUBTOWN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check HUBTOWN.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ARVSMART.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ARVSMART.BO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ARVSMART.BO trades at ₹625.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ARVSMART.BO's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARVSMART.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ARVSMART.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ARVSMART.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ARVSMART.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ARVSMART.NS trades at ₹627.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ARVSMART.NS's P/E ratio is 38.79. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARVSMART.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ARVSMART.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs NATIONSTD.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, NATIONSTD.BO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while NATIONSTD.BO trades at ₹1,355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas NATIONSTD.BO's P/E ratio is 273.71. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATIONSTD.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to NATIONSTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check NATIONSTD.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs AJMERA.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, AJMERA.BO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while AJMERA.BO trades at ₹126.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas AJMERA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AJMERA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to AJMERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check AJMERA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs AJMERA.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, AJMERA.NS has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while AJMERA.NS trades at ₹126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas AJMERA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AJMERA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to AJMERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check AJMERA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ALEMBICLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.BO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ALEMBICLTD.BO trades at ₹91.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ALEMBICLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ALEMBICLTD.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ARKADE.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ARKADE.NS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ARKADE.NS trades at ₹125.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ARKADE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARKADE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to ARKADE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ARKADE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs MIIL.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, MIIL.BO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while MIIL.BO trades at ₹769.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas MIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1979.49. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIIL.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to MIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check MIIL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs OMAXE.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, OMAXE.BO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while OMAXE.BO trades at ₹84.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas OMAXE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMAXE.BO's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to OMAXE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check OMAXE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs OMAXE.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, OMAXE.NS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while OMAXE.NS trades at ₹85.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas OMAXE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMAXE.NS's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to OMAXE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check OMAXE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.NS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SHRIRAMPPS.NS trades at ₹90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.BO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SHRIRAMPPS.BO trades at ₹91.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ASL.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ASL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ASL.BO trades at ₹310.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ASL.BO's P/E ratio is -1320.85. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to ASL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ASL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ARIHANTSUP.NS trades at ₹273.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ARIHANTSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.BO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ARIHANTSUP.BO trades at ₹275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ARIHANTSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SURAJEST.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SURAJEST.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SURAJEST.NS trades at ₹234.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SURAJEST.NS's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SURAJEST.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to SURAJEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SURAJEST.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs AGIIL.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, AGIIL.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while AGIIL.BO trades at ₹408.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas AGIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 57.54. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGIIL.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to AGIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check AGIIL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ARIHANT.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ARIHANT.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ARIHANT.BO trades at ₹897.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ARIHANT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARIHANT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ARIHANT.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs RDBRIL.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, RDBRIL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while RDBRIL.BO trades at ₹53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas RDBRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 213.12. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDBRIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to RDBRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check RDBRIL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs MCCHRLS-B.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, MCCHRLS-B.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while MCCHRLS-B.BO trades at ₹676.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas MCCHRLS-B.BO's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check MCCHRLS-B.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs ARIHANT.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, ARIHANT.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while ARIHANT.NS trades at ₹904.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas ARIHANT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARIHANT.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check ARIHANT.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs MODIS.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, MODIS.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while MODIS.BO trades at ₹395.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas MODIS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MODIS.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to MODIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check MODIS.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs OSWALAGRO.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while OSWALAGRO.BO trades at ₹49.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas OSWALAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSWALAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs OSWALAGRO.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while OSWALAGRO.NS trades at ₹48.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas OSWALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSWALAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs HAZOOR.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, HAZOOR.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while HAZOOR.BO trades at ₹27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas HAZOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAZOOR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to HAZOOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check HAZOOR.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs GEECEE.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, GEECEE.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while GEECEE.BO trades at ₹296.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas GEECEE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEECEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to GEECEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check GEECEE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs GEECEE.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, GEECEE.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while GEECEE.NS trades at ₹294.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas GEECEE.NS's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEECEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to GEECEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check GEECEE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs PENINLAND.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, PENINLAND.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while PENINLAND.NS trades at ₹16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas PENINLAND.NS's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PENINLAND.NS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to PENINLAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check PENINLAND.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs PENINLAND.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, PENINLAND.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while PENINLAND.BO trades at ₹16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas PENINLAND.BO's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PENINLAND.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to PENINLAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check PENINLAND.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs NILASPACES.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, NILASPACES.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while NILASPACES.NS trades at ₹13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas NILASPACES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NILASPACES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to NILASPACES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check NILASPACES.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs NILASPACES.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, NILASPACES.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while NILASPACES.BO trades at ₹13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas NILASPACES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NILASPACES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to NILASPACES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check NILASPACES.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs PANSARI.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, PANSARI.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while PANSARI.NS trades at ₹306.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas PANSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PANSARI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to PANSARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check PANSARI.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SBGLP.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SBGLP.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SBGLP.BO trades at ₹26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SBGLP.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SBGLP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to SBGLP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SBGLP.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SBGLP.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SBGLP.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SBGLP.NS trades at ₹27.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SBGLP.NS's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SBGLP.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to SBGLP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SBGLP.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs YOGI.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, YOGI.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while YOGI.BO trades at ₹166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas YOGI.BO's P/E ratio is 35.40. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YOGI.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to YOGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check YOGI.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs EMAMIREAL.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while EMAMIREAL.BO trades at ₹95.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas EMAMIREAL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMAMIREAL.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs EMAMIREAL.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while EMAMIREAL.NS trades at ₹94.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas EMAMIREAL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMAMIREAL.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs PARSVNATH.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while PARSVNATH.BO trades at ₹7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas PARSVNATH.BO's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PARSVNATH.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to PARSVNATH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check PARSVNATH.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs RATNABHUMI.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, RATNABHUMI.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while RATNABHUMI.BO trades at ₹254.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas RATNABHUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 67.02. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RATNABHUMI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to RATNABHUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check RATNABHUMI.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs PARSVNATH.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while PARSVNATH.NS trades at ₹7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas PARSVNATH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PARSVNATH.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to PARSVNATH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check PARSVNATH.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs NILAINFRA.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while NILAINFRA.BO trades at ₹8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas NILAINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NILAINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS and NILAINFRA.BO have similar daily volatility (4.57).Check NILAINFRA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs NILAINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while NILAINFRA.NS trades at ₹8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas NILAINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NILAINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to NILAINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check NILAINFRA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SVGLOBAL.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SVGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SVGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SVGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.70. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to SVGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SVGLOBAL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs MERCANTILE.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, MERCANTILE.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while MERCANTILE.BO trades at ₹23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas MERCANTILE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MERCANTILE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to MERCANTILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check MERCANTILE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs RVHL.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, RVHL.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while RVHL.NS trades at ₹42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas RVHL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RVHL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to RVHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check RVHL.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs RVHL.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, RVHL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while RVHL.BO trades at ₹43.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas RVHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RVHL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to RVHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check RVHL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.BO Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while KBCGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas KBCGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs SUMIT.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, SUMIT.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while SUMIT.NS trades at ₹53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas SUMIT.NS's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUMIT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is more volatile compared to SUMIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check SUMIT.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while KBCGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas KBCGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.NS vs YAARI.NS Comparison May 2026
HUBTOWN.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.NS stands at 28.6B. In comparison, YAARI.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.NS is priced at ₹204.99, while YAARI.NS trades at ₹21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.45, whereas YAARI.NS's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YAARI.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.NS is less volatile compared to YAARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.NS.Check YAARI.NS's competition here