TARC Limited (TARC.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TARC.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TARC.NS | ₹126.34 | -0.42% | 37.4B | 194.77 | ₹0.65 | N/A |
| DLF.NS | ₹682.05 | +3.62% | 1.7T | 37.68 | ₹17.94 | +0.89% |
| DLF.BO | ₹682.65 | +3.81% | 1.7T | 37.86 | ₹17.85 | +0.89% |
| LODHA.BO | ₹1,093.00 | +8.75% | 1.1T | 30.87 | ₹34.24 | +0.40% |
| LODHA.NS | ₹1,088.30 | +8.16% | 1.1T | 30.84 | ₹34.27 | +0.40% |
| PHOENIXLTD.NS | ₹2,081.10 | +3.41% | 732.3B | 61.71 | ₹33.18 | +0.12% |
| OBEROIRLTY.NS | ₹1,974.60 | +5.89% | 703.4B | 27.86 | ₹69.44 | +0.41% |
| OBEROIRLTY.BO | ₹1,982.80 | +6.31% | 702.1B | 27.91 | ₹69.16 | +0.41% |
| GODREJPROP.BO | ₹2,044.95 | +3.90% | 602.3B | 32.47 | ₹61.46 | N/A |
| GODREJPROP.NS | ₹2,037.10 | +3.47% | 601.4B | 32.27 | ₹61.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TARC.NS vs DLF.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, DLF.NS has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while DLF.NS trades at ₹682.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas DLF.NS's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DLF.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to DLF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DLF.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs DLF.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, DLF.BO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while DLF.BO trades at ₹682.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas DLF.BO's P/E ratio is 37.86. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DLF.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to DLF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DLF.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs LODHA.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, LODHA.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while LODHA.BO trades at ₹1,093.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas LODHA.BO's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LODHA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to LODHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check LODHA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs LODHA.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, LODHA.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while LODHA.NS trades at ₹1,088.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas LODHA.NS's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LODHA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to LODHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check LODHA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs PHOENIXLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PHOENIXLTD.NS has a market cap of 732.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while PHOENIXLTD.NS trades at ₹2,081.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas PHOENIXLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 61.71. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PHOENIXLTD.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to PHOENIXLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PHOENIXLTD.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.NS has a market cap of 703.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while OBEROIRLTY.NS trades at ₹1,974.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas OBEROIRLTY.NS's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.BO has a market cap of 702.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while OBEROIRLTY.BO trades at ₹1,982.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas OBEROIRLTY.BO's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GODREJPROP.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.BO has a market cap of 602.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while GODREJPROP.BO trades at ₹2,044.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas GODREJPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GODREJPROP.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJPROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GODREJPROP.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GODREJPROP.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.NS has a market cap of 601.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while GODREJPROP.NS trades at ₹2,037.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas GODREJPROP.NS's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GODREJPROP.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJPROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GODREJPROP.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ANANTRAJ.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.BO has a market cap of 199.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ANANTRAJ.BO trades at ₹551.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ANANTRAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANANTRAJ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ANANTRAJ.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.NS has a market cap of 199.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ANANTRAJ.NS trades at ₹550.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ANANTRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANANTRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs BRIGADE.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BRIGADE.BO has a market cap of 167.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while BRIGADE.BO trades at ₹524.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas BRIGADE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRIGADE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to BRIGADE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check BRIGADE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs BRIGADE.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BRIGADE.NS has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while BRIGADE.NS trades at ₹520.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas BRIGADE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRIGADE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to BRIGADE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check BRIGADE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SOBHA.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SOBHA.NS has a market cap of 154.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SOBHA.NS trades at ₹1,455.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SOBHA.NS's P/E ratio is 79.76. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOBHA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SOBHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SOBHA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SOBHA.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SOBHA.BO has a market cap of 153.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SOBHA.BO trades at ₹1,459.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SOBHA.BO's P/E ratio is 79.82. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOBHA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SOBHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SOBHA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SIGNATURE.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.NS has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SIGNATURE.NS trades at ₹784.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SIGNATURE.NS's P/E ratio is 459.18. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIGNATURE.NS's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SIGNATURE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SIGNATURE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SIGNATURE.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.BO has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SIGNATURE.BO trades at ₹790.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SIGNATURE.BO's P/E ratio is 470.90. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIGNATURE.BO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SIGNATURE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SIGNATURE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBREALEST.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, IBREALEST.BO has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while IBREALEST.BO trades at ₹150.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas IBREALEST.BO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IBREALEST.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to IBREALEST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBREALEST.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBREALEST.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, IBREALEST.NS has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while IBREALEST.NS trades at ₹131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas IBREALEST.NS's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IBREALEST.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBREALEST.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAHLIFE.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.BO has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while MAHLIFE.BO trades at ₹372.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas MAHLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAHLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MAHLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAHLIFE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAHLIFE.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.NS has a market cap of 78.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while MAHLIFE.NS trades at ₹370.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas MAHLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAHLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MAHLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAHLIFE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAXESTATES.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.NS has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while MAXESTATES.NS trades at ₹436.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas MAXESTATES.NS's P/E ratio is 341.53. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAXESTATES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MAXESTATES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAXESTATES.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MAXESTATES.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.BO has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while MAXESTATES.BO trades at ₹433.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas MAXESTATES.BO's P/E ratio is 528.73. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAXESTATES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MAXESTATES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MAXESTATES.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GANESHHOU.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.BO has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while GANESHHOU.BO trades at ₹797.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas GANESHHOU.BO's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GANESHHOU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to GANESHHOU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GANESHHOU.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GANESHHOU.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.NS has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while GANESHHOU.NS trades at ₹795.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas GANESHHOU.NS's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GANESHHOU.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to GANESHHOU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GANESHHOU.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBULLSLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.BO has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while IBULLSLTD.BO trades at ₹30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas IBULLSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IBULLSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs IBULLSLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.NS has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while IBULLSLTD.NS trades at ₹30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas IBULLSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IBULLSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs KALPATARU.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, KALPATARU.NS has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while KALPATARU.NS trades at ₹304.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas KALPATARU.NS's P/E ratio is 64.87. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KALPATARU.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to KALPATARU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KALPATARU.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs DBREALTY.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, DBREALTY.NS has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while DBREALTY.NS trades at ₹115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas DBREALTY.NS's P/E ratio is 549.64. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBREALTY.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DBREALTY.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs DBREALTY.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, DBREALTY.BO has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while DBREALTY.BO trades at ₹115.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas DBREALTY.BO's P/E ratio is 236.98. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBREALTY.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check DBREALTY.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs NIRLON.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NIRLON.BO has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while NIRLON.BO trades at ₹622.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas NIRLON.BO's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIRLON.BO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to NIRLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NIRLON.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.NS has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while RUSTOMJEE.NS trades at ₹428.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas RUSTOMJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 40.71. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.BO has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while RUSTOMJEE.BO trades at ₹429.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas RUSTOMJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 69.37. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs PURVA.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PURVA.NS has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while PURVA.NS trades at ₹222.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas PURVA.NS's P/E ratio is -57.70. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PURVA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to PURVA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PURVA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs PURVA.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PURVA.BO has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while PURVA.BO trades at ₹221.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas PURVA.BO's P/E ratio is -36.90. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PURVA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to PURVA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PURVA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GANESHHOUC.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.NS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while GANESHHOUC.NS trades at ₹584.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas GANESHHOUC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GANESHHOUC.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs SUNTECK.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SUNTECK.BO has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SUNTECK.BO trades at ₹340.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SUNTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUNTECK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SUNTECK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SUNTECK.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SUNTECK.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SUNTECK.NS has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SUNTECK.NS trades at ₹336.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SUNTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUNTECK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SUNTECK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SUNTECK.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs AGIIL.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AGIIL.NS has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while AGIIL.NS trades at ₹351.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas AGIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.51. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AGIIL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to AGIIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AGIIL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs HEMIPROP.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, HEMIPROP.BO has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while HEMIPROP.BO trades at ₹141.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas HEMIPROP.BO's P/E ratio is -369.58. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HEMIPROP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to HEMIPROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check HEMIPROP.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ASHIANA.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ASHIANA.NS has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ASHIANA.NS trades at ₹385.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ASHIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASHIANA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ASHIANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ASHIANA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ASHIANA.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ASHIANA.BO has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ASHIANA.BO trades at ₹386.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ASHIANA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASHIANA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ASHIANA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ASHIANA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs TARC.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, TARC.BO has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while TARC.BO trades at ₹125.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas TARC.BO's P/E ratio is -45.04. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TARC.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to TARC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check TARC.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KESAR.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, KESAR.BO has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while KESAR.BO trades at ₹1,253.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas KESAR.BO's P/E ratio is 125.03. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KESAR.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to KESAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KESAR.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.BO has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while KOLTEPATIL.BO trades at ₹370.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas KOLTEPATIL.BO's P/E ratio is -74.49. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while KOLTEPATIL.NS trades at ₹371.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas KOLTEPATIL.NS's P/E ratio is -73.73. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs HUBTOWN.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while HUBTOWN.BO trades at ₹212.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas HUBTOWN.BO's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUBTOWN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to HUBTOWN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check HUBTOWN.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs HUBTOWN.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.NS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while HUBTOWN.NS trades at ₹211.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas HUBTOWN.NS's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUBTOWN.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to HUBTOWN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check HUBTOWN.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MARATHON.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MARATHON.NS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while MARATHON.NS trades at ₹422.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas MARATHON.NS's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MARATHON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MARATHON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MARATHON.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MARATHON.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MARATHON.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while MARATHON.BO trades at ₹422.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas MARATHON.BO's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MARATHON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MARATHON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MARATHON.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARVSMART.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ARVSMART.NS has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ARVSMART.NS trades at ₹607.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ARVSMART.NS's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARVSMART.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ARVSMART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARVSMART.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARVSMART.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ARVSMART.BO has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ARVSMART.BO trades at ₹610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ARVSMART.BO's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARVSMART.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ARVSMART.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARVSMART.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs AJMERA.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AJMERA.NS has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while AJMERA.NS trades at ₹134.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas AJMERA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AJMERA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to AJMERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AJMERA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs AJMERA.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AJMERA.BO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while AJMERA.BO trades at ₹134.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas AJMERA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AJMERA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to AJMERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AJMERA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ALEMBICLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ALEMBICLTD.NS trades at ₹91.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ALEMBICLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALEMBICLTD.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ALEMBICLTD.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ALEMBICLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ALEMBICLTD.BO trades at ₹92.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ALEMBICLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ALEMBICLTD.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARKADE.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ARKADE.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ARKADE.NS trades at ₹124.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ARKADE.NS's P/E ratio is 427.48. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARKADE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ARKADE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARKADE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs NATIONSTD.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NATIONSTD.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while NATIONSTD.BO trades at ₹777.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas NATIONSTD.BO's P/E ratio is 235.87. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NATIONSTD.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to NATIONSTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NATIONSTD.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.BO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SHRIRAMPPS.BO trades at ₹92.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.BO's P/E ratio is 82.52. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.NS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SHRIRAMPPS.NS trades at ₹91.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs OMAXE.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, OMAXE.NS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while OMAXE.NS trades at ₹88.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas OMAXE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OMAXE.NS's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to OMAXE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OMAXE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs OMAXE.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, OMAXE.BO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while OMAXE.BO trades at ₹87.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas OMAXE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OMAXE.BO's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to OMAXE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OMAXE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ASL.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ASL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ASL.BO trades at ₹310.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ASL.BO's P/E ratio is -1320.85. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ASL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ASL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs UNITECH.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, UNITECH.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while UNITECH.BO trades at ₹4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas UNITECH.BO's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNITECH.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to UNITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check UNITECH.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs UNITECH.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, UNITECH.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while UNITECH.NS trades at ₹4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas UNITECH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNITECH.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to UNITECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check UNITECH.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ARIHANTSUP.NS trades at ₹266.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ARIHANTSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 40.25. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ARIHANTSUP.BO trades at ₹251.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ARIHANTSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SURAJEST.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SURAJEST.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SURAJEST.NS trades at ₹202.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SURAJEST.NS's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SURAJEST.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SURAJEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SURAJEST.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs BRRL.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BRRL.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while BRRL.BO trades at ₹938.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas BRRL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRRL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to BRRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check BRRL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs MCCHRLS-B.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MCCHRLS-B.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while MCCHRLS-B.BO trades at ₹705.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas MCCHRLS-B.BO's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MCCHRLS-B.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs RDBRIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, RDBRIL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while RDBRIL.BO trades at ₹53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas RDBRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 213.12. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RDBRIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to RDBRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RDBRIL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs AGIIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AGIIL.BO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while AGIIL.BO trades at ₹352.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas AGIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AGIIL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to AGIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check AGIIL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARIHANT.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ARIHANT.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ARIHANT.BO trades at ₹814.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ARIHANT.BO's P/E ratio is 75.70. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARIHANT.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARIHANT.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs GEECEE.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GEECEE.NS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while GEECEE.NS trades at ₹358.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas GEECEE.NS's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEECEE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to GEECEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GEECEE.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs GEECEE.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GEECEE.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while GEECEE.BO trades at ₹361.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas GEECEE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEECEE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to GEECEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check GEECEE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs ARIHANT.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ARIHANT.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while ARIHANT.NS trades at ₹813.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas ARIHANT.NS's P/E ratio is 283.01. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARIHANT.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check ARIHANT.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MODIS.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MODIS.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while MODIS.BO trades at ₹341.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas MODIS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MODIS.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MODIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MODIS.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SHRADDHA.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SHRADDHA.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SHRADDHA.BO trades at ₹151.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SHRADDHA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHRADDHA.BO's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SHRADDHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SHRADDHA.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs HAZOOR.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, HAZOOR.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while HAZOOR.BO trades at ₹24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas HAZOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HAZOOR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to HAZOOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check HAZOOR.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs OSWALAGRO.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while OSWALAGRO.BO trades at ₹41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas OSWALAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is -24.92. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OSWALAGRO.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs OSWALAGRO.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while OSWALAGRO.NS trades at ₹41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas OSWALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is -25.28. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OSWALAGRO.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs PANSARI.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PANSARI.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while PANSARI.NS trades at ₹322.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas PANSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PANSARI.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to PANSARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PANSARI.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs NILASPACES.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NILASPACES.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while NILASPACES.BO trades at ₹12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas NILASPACES.BO's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NILASPACES.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to NILASPACES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NILASPACES.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs NILASPACES.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NILASPACES.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while NILASPACES.NS trades at ₹12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas NILASPACES.NS's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NILASPACES.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to NILASPACES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NILASPACES.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs PENINLAND.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PENINLAND.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while PENINLAND.NS trades at ₹15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas PENINLAND.NS's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PENINLAND.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to PENINLAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PENINLAND.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs PENINLAND.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PENINLAND.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while PENINLAND.BO trades at ₹15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas PENINLAND.BO's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PENINLAND.BO's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to PENINLAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check PENINLAND.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs YOGI.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, YOGI.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while YOGI.BO trades at ₹169.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas YOGI.BO's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YOGI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to YOGI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check YOGI.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SBGLP.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SBGLP.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SBGLP.BO trades at ₹25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SBGLP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBGLP.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SBGLP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SBGLP.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SBGLP.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SBGLP.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SBGLP.NS trades at ₹25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SBGLP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBGLP.NS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to SBGLP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SBGLP.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs RDBIPL.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, RDBIPL.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while RDBIPL.BO trades at ₹19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas RDBIPL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RDBIPL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to RDBIPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RDBIPL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs EMAMIREAL.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while EMAMIREAL.NS trades at ₹85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas EMAMIREAL.NS's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMAMIREAL.NS's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs EMAMIREAL.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while EMAMIREAL.BO trades at ₹86.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas EMAMIREAL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMAMIREAL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs NILAINFRA.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while NILAINFRA.NS trades at ₹7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas NILAINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NILAINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to NILAINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check NILAINFRA.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs MERCANTILE.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MERCANTILE.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while MERCANTILE.BO trades at ₹24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas MERCANTILE.BO's P/E ratio is 324.75. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MERCANTILE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to MERCANTILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check MERCANTILE.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs RVHL.NS Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, RVHL.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while RVHL.NS trades at ₹45.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas RVHL.NS's P/E ratio is 46.62. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RVHL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to RVHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RVHL.NS's competition here
TARC.NS vs RVHL.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, RVHL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while RVHL.BO trades at ₹44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas RVHL.BO's P/E ratio is -168.04. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RVHL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to RVHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RVHL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs RATNABHUMI.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, RATNABHUMI.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while RATNABHUMI.BO trades at ₹191.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas RATNABHUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 443.21. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RATNABHUMI.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is less volatile compared to RATNABHUMI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check RATNABHUMI.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs SVGLOBAL.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SVGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while SVGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹141.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas SVGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 88.72. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVGLOBAL.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to SVGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check SVGLOBAL.BO's competition here
TARC.NS vs TULIVE.BO Comparison July 2026
TARC.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TARC.NS stands at 37.4B. In comparison, TULIVE.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TARC.NS is priced at ₹126.34, while TULIVE.BO trades at ₹1,170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TARC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 194.77, whereas TULIVE.BO's P/E ratio is -221.17. In terms of profitability, TARC.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TULIVE.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TARC.NS is more volatile compared to TULIVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TARC.NS.Check TULIVE.BO's competition here