Hubtown Limited (HUBTOWN.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HUBTOWN.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBTOWN.BO | ₹201.25 | -7.54% | 29.8B | 19.63 | ₹10.70 | N/A |
| DLF.BO | ₹633.75 | -5.78% | 1.6T | 36.48 | ₹17.85 | +0.92% |
| DLF.NS | ₹634.00 | -5.84% | 1.6T | 36.41 | ₹17.88 | +0.92% |
| LODHA.BO | ₹1,114.15 | +1.67% | 1.1T | 32.22 | ₹34.24 | +0.39% |
| LODHA.NS | ₹1,115.10 | +1.75% | 1.1T | 32.17 | ₹34.27 | +0.39% |
| PHOENIXLTD.NS | ₹2,022.50 | -3.96% | 742.1B | 62.54 | ₹33.18 | +0.12% |
| OBEROIRLTY.BO | ₹1,871.50 | -4.14% | 694.5B | 27.56 | ₹69.16 | +0.42% |
| OBEROIRLTY.NS | ₹1,870.10 | -4.26% | 693.2B | 27.45 | ₹69.44 | +0.42% |
| GODREJPROP.NS | ₹1,979.50 | -3.27% | 615.7B | 33.04 | ₹61.86 | N/A |
| GODREJPROP.BO | ₹1,979.80 | -3.28% | 614.4B | 33.19 | ₹61.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HUBTOWN.BO vs DLF.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, DLF.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while DLF.BO trades at ₹633.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas DLF.BO's P/E ratio is 36.48. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLF.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to DLF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check DLF.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs DLF.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, DLF.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while DLF.NS trades at ₹634.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas DLF.NS's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLF.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to DLF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check DLF.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs LODHA.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, LODHA.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while LODHA.BO trades at ₹1,114.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas LODHA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LODHA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to LODHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check LODHA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs LODHA.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, LODHA.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while LODHA.NS trades at ₹1,115.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas LODHA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LODHA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to LODHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check LODHA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs PHOENIXLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, PHOENIXLTD.NS has a market cap of 742.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while PHOENIXLTD.NS trades at ₹2,022.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas PHOENIXLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 62.54. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PHOENIXLTD.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to PHOENIXLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check PHOENIXLTD.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs OBEROIRLTY.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.BO has a market cap of 694.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while OBEROIRLTY.BO trades at ₹1,871.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas OBEROIRLTY.BO's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check OBEROIRLTY.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs OBEROIRLTY.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.NS has a market cap of 693.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while OBEROIRLTY.NS trades at ₹1,870.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas OBEROIRLTY.NS's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check OBEROIRLTY.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs GODREJPROP.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.NS has a market cap of 615.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while GODREJPROP.NS trades at ₹1,979.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas GODREJPROP.NS's P/E ratio is 33.04. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GODREJPROP.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to GODREJPROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check GODREJPROP.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs GODREJPROP.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.BO has a market cap of 614.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while GODREJPROP.BO trades at ₹1,979.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas GODREJPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GODREJPROP.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to GODREJPROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check GODREJPROP.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ANANTRAJ.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.BO has a market cap of 194.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ANANTRAJ.BO trades at ₹544.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ANANTRAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 33.64. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANANTRAJ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ANANTRAJ.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ANANTRAJ.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.NS has a market cap of 193.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ANANTRAJ.NS trades at ₹544.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ANANTRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 34.81. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANANTRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ANANTRAJ.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs BRIGADE.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, BRIGADE.NS has a market cap of 168.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while BRIGADE.NS trades at ₹502.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas BRIGADE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRIGADE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to BRIGADE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check BRIGADE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs BRIGADE.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, BRIGADE.BO has a market cap of 168.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while BRIGADE.BO trades at ₹498.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas BRIGADE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRIGADE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to BRIGADE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check BRIGADE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SOBHA.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SOBHA.NS has a market cap of 155.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SOBHA.NS trades at ₹1,451.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SOBHA.NS's P/E ratio is 80.39. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOBHA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to SOBHA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SOBHA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SOBHA.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SOBHA.BO has a market cap of 154.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SOBHA.BO trades at ₹1,452.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SOBHA.BO's P/E ratio is 80.49. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOBHA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to SOBHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SOBHA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SIGNATURE.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.NS has a market cap of 110B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SIGNATURE.NS trades at ₹769.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SIGNATURE.NS's P/E ratio is 474.03. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIGNATURE.NS's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SIGNATURE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SIGNATURE.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.BO has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SIGNATURE.BO trades at ₹768.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SIGNATURE.BO's P/E ratio is 485.40. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIGNATURE.BO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SIGNATURE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs IBREALEST.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, IBREALEST.BO has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while IBREALEST.BO trades at ₹150.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas IBREALEST.BO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBREALEST.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check IBREALEST.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs IBREALEST.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, IBREALEST.NS has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while IBREALEST.NS trades at ₹131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas IBREALEST.NS's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBREALEST.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check IBREALEST.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs MAHLIFE.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.BO has a market cap of 79.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while MAHLIFE.BO trades at ₹358.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas MAHLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAHLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check MAHLIFE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs MAHLIFE.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.NS has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while MAHLIFE.NS trades at ₹359.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas MAHLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAHLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check MAHLIFE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs MAXESTATES.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.NS has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while MAXESTATES.NS trades at ₹431.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas MAXESTATES.NS's P/E ratio is 349.98. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAXESTATES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to MAXESTATES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check MAXESTATES.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs MAXESTATES.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.BO has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while MAXESTATES.BO trades at ₹431.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas MAXESTATES.BO's P/E ratio is 541.63. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAXESTATES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to MAXESTATES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check MAXESTATES.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs GANESHHOU.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.BO has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while GANESHHOU.BO trades at ₹823.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas GANESHHOU.BO's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GANESHHOU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to GANESHHOU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check GANESHHOU.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs GANESHHOU.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.NS has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while GANESHHOU.NS trades at ₹822.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas GANESHHOU.NS's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GANESHHOU.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to GANESHHOU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check GANESHHOU.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs IBULLSLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.BO has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while IBULLSLTD.BO trades at ₹28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas IBULLSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBULLSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check IBULLSLTD.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs IBULLSLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.NS has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while IBULLSLTD.NS trades at ₹28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas IBULLSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBULLSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check IBULLSLTD.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs DBREALTY.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, DBREALTY.BO has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while DBREALTY.BO trades at ₹109.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas DBREALTY.BO's P/E ratio is 234.38. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBREALTY.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check DBREALTY.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs KALPATARU.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, KALPATARU.NS has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while KALPATARU.NS trades at ₹286.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas KALPATARU.NS's P/E ratio is 62.54. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KALPATARU.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to KALPATARU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check KALPATARU.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs DBREALTY.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, DBREALTY.NS has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while DBREALTY.NS trades at ₹109.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas DBREALTY.NS's P/E ratio is 540.82. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBREALTY.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check DBREALTY.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs NIRLON.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, NIRLON.BO has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while NIRLON.BO trades at ₹621.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas NIRLON.BO's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NIRLON.BO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to NIRLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check NIRLON.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs RUSTOMJEE.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.NS has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while RUSTOMJEE.NS trades at ₹412.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas RUSTOMJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check RUSTOMJEE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs RUSTOMJEE.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.BO has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while RUSTOMJEE.BO trades at ₹413.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas RUSTOMJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 67.25. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check RUSTOMJEE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs PURVA.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, PURVA.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while PURVA.NS trades at ₹214.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas PURVA.NS's P/E ratio is -38.54. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PURVA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to PURVA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check PURVA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs PURVA.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, PURVA.BO has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while PURVA.BO trades at ₹215.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas PURVA.BO's P/E ratio is -38.57. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PURVA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to PURVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check PURVA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs GANESHHOUC.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.NS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while GANESHHOUC.NS trades at ₹584.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas GANESHHOUC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GANESHHOUC.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check GANESHHOUC.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SUNTECK.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SUNTECK.NS has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SUNTECK.NS trades at ₹312.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SUNTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUNTECK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to SUNTECK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SUNTECK.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SUNTECK.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SUNTECK.BO has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SUNTECK.BO trades at ₹312.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SUNTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUNTECK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to SUNTECK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SUNTECK.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs AGIIL.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, AGIIL.NS has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while AGIIL.NS trades at ₹333.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas AGIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.37. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGIIL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to AGIIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check AGIIL.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs HEMIPROP.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, HEMIPROP.BO has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while HEMIPROP.BO trades at ₹135.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas HEMIPROP.BO's P/E ratio is -357.30. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HEMIPROP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to HEMIPROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check HEMIPROP.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ASHIANA.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ASHIANA.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ASHIANA.BO trades at ₹372.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ASHIANA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASHIANA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ASHIANA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ASHIANA.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ASHIANA.NS has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ASHIANA.NS trades at ₹372.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ASHIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASHIANA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ASHIANA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs TARC.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, TARC.NS has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while TARC.NS trades at ₹124.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas TARC.NS's P/E ratio is 196.17. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TARC.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to TARC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check TARC.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs KESAR.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, KESAR.BO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while KESAR.BO trades at ₹1,230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas KESAR.BO's P/E ratio is 124.22. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KESAR.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to KESAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check KESAR.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs TARC.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, TARC.BO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while TARC.BO trades at ₹124.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas TARC.BO's P/E ratio is -45.20. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TARC.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to TARC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check TARC.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs KOLTEPATIL.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.NS has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while KOLTEPATIL.NS trades at ₹356.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas KOLTEPATIL.NS's P/E ratio is -74.17. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check KOLTEPATIL.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs KOLTEPATIL.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.BO has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while KOLTEPATIL.BO trades at ₹356.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas KOLTEPATIL.BO's P/E ratio is -74.13. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check KOLTEPATIL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs HUBTOWN.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while HUBTOWN.NS trades at ₹202.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas HUBTOWN.NS's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUBTOWN.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to HUBTOWN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check HUBTOWN.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs MARATHON.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, MARATHON.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while MARATHON.NS trades at ₹396.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas MARATHON.NS's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MARATHON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to MARATHON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check MARATHON.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs MARATHON.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, MARATHON.BO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while MARATHON.BO trades at ₹396.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas MARATHON.BO's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MARATHON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to MARATHON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check MARATHON.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ARVSMART.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ARVSMART.BO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ARVSMART.BO trades at ₹597.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ARVSMART.BO's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARVSMART.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ARVSMART.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ARVSMART.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ARVSMART.NS has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ARVSMART.NS trades at ₹599.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ARVSMART.NS's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARVSMART.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ARVSMART.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs AJMERA.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, AJMERA.NS has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while AJMERA.NS trades at ₹125.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas AJMERA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AJMERA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to AJMERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check AJMERA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs AJMERA.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, AJMERA.BO has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while AJMERA.BO trades at ₹124.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas AJMERA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AJMERA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to AJMERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check AJMERA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ARKADE.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ARKADE.NS has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ARKADE.NS trades at ₹125.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ARKADE.NS's P/E ratio is 451.93. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARKADE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to ARKADE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ARKADE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ALEMBICLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.NS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ALEMBICLTD.NS trades at ₹87.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ALEMBICLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALEMBICLTD.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ALEMBICLTD.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ALEMBICLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.BO has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ALEMBICLTD.BO trades at ₹87.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ALEMBICLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ALEMBICLTD.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs OMAXE.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, OMAXE.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while OMAXE.NS trades at ₹84.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas OMAXE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OMAXE.NS's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to OMAXE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check OMAXE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs OMAXE.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, OMAXE.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while OMAXE.BO trades at ₹84.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas OMAXE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OMAXE.BO's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to OMAXE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check OMAXE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SHRIRAMPPS.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.NS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SHRIRAMPPS.NS trades at ₹86.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SHRIRAMPPS.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SHRIRAMPPS.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.BO has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SHRIRAMPPS.BO trades at ₹87.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.BO's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SHRIRAMPPS.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs NATIONSTD.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, NATIONSTD.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while NATIONSTD.BO trades at ₹629.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas NATIONSTD.BO's P/E ratio is 169.84. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NATIONSTD.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to NATIONSTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check NATIONSTD.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ASL.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ASL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ASL.BO trades at ₹310.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ASL.BO's P/E ratio is -1320.85. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to ASL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ASL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs UNITECH.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, UNITECH.NS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while UNITECH.NS trades at ₹4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas UNITECH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNITECH.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to UNITECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check UNITECH.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs UNITECH.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, UNITECH.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while UNITECH.BO trades at ₹4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas UNITECH.BO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNITECH.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to UNITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check UNITECH.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ARIHANTSUP.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ARIHANTSUP.BO trades at ₹257.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ARIHANTSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ARIHANTSUP.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ARIHANTSUP.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.NS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ARIHANTSUP.NS trades at ₹260.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ARIHANTSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 41.52. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ARIHANTSUP.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs BRRL.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, BRRL.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while BRRL.BO trades at ₹910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas BRRL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRRL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to BRRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check BRRL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SURAJEST.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SURAJEST.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SURAJEST.NS trades at ₹200.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SURAJEST.NS's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SURAJEST.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to SURAJEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SURAJEST.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs MCCHRLS-B.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, MCCHRLS-B.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while MCCHRLS-B.BO trades at ₹699.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas MCCHRLS-B.BO's P/E ratio is -15.58. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check MCCHRLS-B.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs RDBRIL.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, RDBRIL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while RDBRIL.BO trades at ₹53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas RDBRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 213.12. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDBRIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to RDBRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check RDBRIL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs AGIIL.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, AGIIL.BO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while AGIIL.BO trades at ₹333.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas AGIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGIIL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to AGIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check AGIIL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ARIHANT.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ARIHANT.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ARIHANT.BO trades at ₹808.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ARIHANT.BO's P/E ratio is 76.37. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIHANT.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to ARIHANT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ARIHANT.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs GEECEE.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, GEECEE.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while GEECEE.BO trades at ₹345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas GEECEE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEECEE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to GEECEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check GEECEE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs GEECEE.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, GEECEE.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while GEECEE.NS trades at ₹339.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas GEECEE.NS's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEECEE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to GEECEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check GEECEE.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs ARIHANT.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ARIHANT.NS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while ARIHANT.NS trades at ₹789.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas ARIHANT.NS's P/E ratio is 289.27. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIHANT.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to ARIHANT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check ARIHANT.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs MODIS.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, MODIS.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while MODIS.BO trades at ₹338.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas MODIS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MODIS.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to MODIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check MODIS.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs PANSARI.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, PANSARI.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while PANSARI.NS trades at ₹356.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas PANSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PANSARI.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to PANSARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check PANSARI.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SHRADDHA.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SHRADDHA.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SHRADDHA.BO trades at ₹144.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SHRADDHA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHRADDHA.BO's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to SHRADDHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SHRADDHA.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs OSWALAGRO.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while OSWALAGRO.BO trades at ₹41.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas OSWALAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is -25.76. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSWALAGRO.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check OSWALAGRO.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs OSWALAGRO.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while OSWALAGRO.NS trades at ₹41.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas OSWALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is -25.41. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSWALAGRO.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check OSWALAGRO.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs HAZOOR.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, HAZOOR.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while HAZOOR.BO trades at ₹23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas HAZOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAZOOR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to HAZOOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check HAZOOR.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs PENINLAND.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, PENINLAND.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while PENINLAND.NS trades at ₹16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas PENINLAND.NS's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENINLAND.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to PENINLAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check PENINLAND.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs PENINLAND.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, PENINLAND.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while PENINLAND.BO trades at ₹16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas PENINLAND.BO's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENINLAND.BO's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to PENINLAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check PENINLAND.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs NILASPACES.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, NILASPACES.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while NILASPACES.NS trades at ₹12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas NILASPACES.NS's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NILASPACES.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to NILASPACES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check NILASPACES.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs NILASPACES.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, NILASPACES.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while NILASPACES.BO trades at ₹12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas NILASPACES.BO's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NILASPACES.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to NILASPACES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check NILASPACES.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs YOGI.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, YOGI.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while YOGI.BO trades at ₹172.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas YOGI.BO's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YOGI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to YOGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check YOGI.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs RDBIPL.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, RDBIPL.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while RDBIPL.BO trades at ₹19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas RDBIPL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDBIPL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to RDBIPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check RDBIPL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SBGLP.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SBGLP.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SBGLP.BO trades at ₹24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SBGLP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBGLP.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to SBGLP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SBGLP.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SBGLP.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SBGLP.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SBGLP.NS trades at ₹24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SBGLP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBGLP.NS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to SBGLP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SBGLP.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs EMAMIREAL.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while EMAMIREAL.BO trades at ₹82.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas EMAMIREAL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMAMIREAL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check EMAMIREAL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs EMAMIREAL.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while EMAMIREAL.NS trades at ₹80.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas EMAMIREAL.NS's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMAMIREAL.NS's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check EMAMIREAL.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs NILAINFRA.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while NILAINFRA.NS trades at ₹7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas NILAINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NILAINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to NILAINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check NILAINFRA.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs MERCANTILE.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, MERCANTILE.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while MERCANTILE.BO trades at ₹23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas MERCANTILE.BO's P/E ratio is 314.25. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MERCANTILE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to MERCANTILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check MERCANTILE.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs RVHL.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, RVHL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while RVHL.BO trades at ₹44.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas RVHL.BO's P/E ratio is -166.69. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RVHL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to RVHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check RVHL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs RVHL.NS Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, RVHL.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while RVHL.NS trades at ₹44.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas RVHL.NS's P/E ratio is 46.46. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RVHL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to RVHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check RVHL.NS's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs RATNABHUMI.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, RATNABHUMI.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while RATNABHUMI.BO trades at ₹186.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas RATNABHUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 430.54. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RATNABHUMI.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to RATNABHUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check RATNABHUMI.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs SVGLOBAL.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SVGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while SVGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹129.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas SVGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 88.13. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVGLOBAL.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is less volatile compared to SVGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check SVGLOBAL.BO's competition here
HUBTOWN.BO vs TULIVE.BO Comparison July 2026
HUBTOWN.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBTOWN.BO stands at 29.8B. In comparison, TULIVE.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBTOWN.BO is priced at ₹201.25, while TULIVE.BO trades at ₹1,170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBTOWN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.63, whereas TULIVE.BO's P/E ratio is -221.17. In terms of profitability, HUBTOWN.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TULIVE.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBTOWN.BO is more volatile compared to TULIVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBTOWN.BO.Check TULIVE.BO's competition here