Vornado Realty Trust
Vornado Realty Trust VNO-PL Peers
See (VNO-PL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
VNO-PL vs DLR Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 56.11B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while DLR trades at $166.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 158.68. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs DLR-PJ Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, DLR-PJ has a market cap of 55.41B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while DLR-PJ trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas DLR-PJ's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to DLR-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs DLR-PK Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 54.94B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while DLR-PK trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs ARE Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 12.72B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while ARE trades at $73.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs BXP Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 10.26B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while BXP trades at $64.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 719.89. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs NBFJF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, NBFJF has a market cap of 7.66B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while NBFJF trades at $900.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas NBFJF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NBFJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to NBFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs GECFF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, GECFF has a market cap of 7.30B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while GECFF trades at $98.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas GECFF's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GECFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to GECFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs VNO-PM Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while VNO-PM trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs VNO Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while VNO trades at $37.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 925.75. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs DLR-PL Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.84B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while DLR-PL trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs JREIF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, JREIF has a market cap of 5.65B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while JREIF trades at $740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas JREIF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JREIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to JREIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs CUZ Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while CUZ trades at $27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 84.23. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs KPDCF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, KPDCF has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while KPDCF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas KPDCF's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KPDCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is less volatile compared to KPDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs SLG-PI Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while SLG-PI trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs SLG Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while SLG trades at $52.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is 654.41. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs MRVGF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, MRVGF has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while MRVGF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas MRVGF's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRVGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to MRVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs KRC Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while KRC trades at $31.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs IMQCF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, IMQCF has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while IMQCF trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas IMQCF's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMQCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is less volatile compared to IMQCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs ORXJF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, ORXJF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while ORXJF trades at $1,245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas ORXJF's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORXJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is less volatile compared to ORXJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs VNO-PN Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while VNO-PN trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs HIW Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while HIW trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs CDP Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while CDP trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs VNO-PO Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while VNO-PO trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs DWVYF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, DWVYF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while DWVYF trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas DWVYF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DWVYF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to DWVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs KREVF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, KREVF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while KREVF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas KREVF's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KREVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to KREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs DEI Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while DEI trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 108.81. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs OGCP Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while OGCP trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs FISK Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while FISK trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is less volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs ESBA Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while ESBA trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs CLI Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs HPP-PC Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while HPP-PC trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -103.55. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs GPEAF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, GPEAF has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while GPEAF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas GPEAF's P/E ratio is -30.77. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GPEAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is less volatile compared to GPEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs APYRF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, APYRF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while APYRF trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas APYRF's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APYRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to APYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs WRE Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs ELME Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while ELME trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -105.97. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs WKPPF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, WKPPF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while WKPPF trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas WKPPF's P/E ratio is -23.92. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WKPPF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to WKPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs JBGS Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while JBGS trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs PGRE Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 996.38M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while PGRE trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -14.66. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs DEA Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 944.58M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while DEA trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 49.54. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs PDM Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 806.16M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while PDM trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs CIO-PA Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 772.05M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while CIO-PA trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs BDN Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 704.78M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while BDN trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs CXP Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.09M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs ALSRF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, ALSRF has a market cap of 678.54M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while ALSRF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas ALSRF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALSRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to ALSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs NLOP Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 451.24M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while NLOP trades at $30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs NIUWF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, NIUWF has a market cap of 447.42M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while NIUWF trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas NIUWF's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NIUWF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to NIUWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs HPP Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 314.60M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while HPP trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs PSTL Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 298.50M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while PSTL trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 45.25. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs CIO Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 197.15M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while CIO trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs DRETF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, DRETF has a market cap of 178.66M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while DRETF trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas DRETF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRETF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to DRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs EQC Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.73M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs FSP Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 156.90M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while FSP trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs ONL Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 112.06M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while ONL trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs TUERF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, TUERF has a market cap of 77.72M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while TUERF trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas TUERF's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TUERF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to TUERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs NYC Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 29.40M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while NYC trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NYC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs SLTTF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, SLTTF has a market cap of 27.41M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while SLTTF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas SLTTF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLTTF's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to SLTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs IVREF Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, IVREF has a market cap of 22.61M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while IVREF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas IVREF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IVREF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to IVREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs OPINL Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 22.32M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while OPINL trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs OPI Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 22.30M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while OPI trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs CMCT Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 5.28M. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while CMCT trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs EQC-PD Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584442.00. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs PRLE Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, PRLE has a market cap of 13142.00. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while PRLE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas PRLE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRLE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to PRLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs DTLA-P Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, DTLA-P comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs CMCTP Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, CMCTP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
VNO-PL vs OFC Comparison
VNO-PL plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VNO-PL stands at 7.19B. In comparison, OFC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, VNO-PL is priced at $17.44, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VNO-PL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.08, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, VNO-PL's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OFC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VNO-PL is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VNO-PL.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLR | $166.61 | +1.25% | 56.11B | 158.68 | $1.05 | +2.92% |
DLR-PJ | $21.01 | -0.02% | 55.41B | 4.35 | $4.83 | +2.92% |
DLR-PK | $22.95 | -0.86% | 54.94B | 4.75 | $4.83 | +2.92% |
ARE | $73.51 | -1.29% | 12.72B | 40.84 | $1.80 | +7.12% |
BXP | $64.79 | -0.40% | 10.26B | 719.89 | $0.09 | +6.03% |
NBFJF | $900.63 | +10.26% | 7.66B | 27.77 | $32.43 | +3.75% |
GECFF | $98.75 | +1.80% | 7.30B | 20.88 | $4.73 | +3.24% |
VNO-PL | $17.44 | -0.06% | 7.19B | 27.08 | $0.64 | +2.00% |
VNO-PM | $16.78 | -0.12% | 7.17B | 26.06 | $0.64 | +2.00% |
VNO | $37.03 | -0.56% | 7.11B | 925.75 | $0.04 | +2.00% |