American Strategic Investment Co.
American Strategic Investment Co. (NYC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NYC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYC | $8.58 | -3.70% | 25.2M | -1.08 | -$7.97 | N/A |
| BXP | $60.01 | -1.02% | 9.6B | 30.15 | $1.99 | +5.09% |
| ARE | $49.68 | -0.76% | 8.7B | -7.93 | -$6.27 | +8.07% |
| VNO-PM | $17.35 | +0.00% | 7.1B | 26.99 | $0.64 | +2.19% |
| VNO-PL | $17.52 | -0.23% | 7B | 27.20 | $0.64 | +2.19% |
| VNO | $33.75 | -0.30% | 6.4B | 9.25 | $3.65 | +2.19% |
| HPP-PC | $14.66 | -0.41% | 5.6B | -119.19 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| CUZ | $26.81 | +0.00% | 4.4B | -894.00 | -$0.03 | +4.73% |
| KRC | $34.27 | -0.26% | 4B | 18.72 | $1.83 | +6.26% |
| SLG-PI | $20.95 | -0.71% | 3.8B | 3.09 | $6.77 | +5.33% |
Stock Comparison
NYC vs BXP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while BXP trades at $60.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check BXP's competition here
NYC vs ARE Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while ARE trades at $49.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ARE's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PM Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while VNO-PM trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PM's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PL Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while VNO-PL trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PL's competition here
NYC vs VNO Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while VNO trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO's competition here
NYC vs HPP-PC Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while HPP-PC trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -119.19. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check HPP-PC's competition here
NYC vs CUZ Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while CUZ trades at $26.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is -894.00. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CUZ's competition here
NYC vs KRC Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while KRC trades at $34.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check KRC's competition here
NYC vs SLG-PI Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while SLG-PI trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.09. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check SLG-PI's competition here
NYC vs CDP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while CDP trades at $32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CDP's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PN Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while VNO-PN trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PN's competition here
NYC vs SLG Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while SLG trades at $45.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check SLG's competition here
NYC vs HIW Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while HIW trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check HIW's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PO Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while VNO-PO trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PO's competition here
NYC vs DEI Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while DEI trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is -68.47. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to DEI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DEI's competition here
NYC vs CLI Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CLI's competition here
NYC vs WRE Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check WRE's competition here
NYC vs FISK Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while FISK trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check FISK's competition here
NYC vs ESBA Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while ESBA trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ESBA's competition here
NYC vs PGRE Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check PGRE's competition here
NYC vs OGCP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while OGCP trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OGCP's competition here
NYC vs DEA Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while DEA trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 108.91. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DEA's competition here
NYC vs PDM Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while PDM trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check PDM's competition here
NYC vs JBGS Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 855.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while JBGS trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check JBGS's competition here
NYC vs PSTL Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 809.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while PSTL trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 44.35. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check PSTL's competition here
NYC vs CXP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CXP's competition here
NYC vs HPP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 650.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while HPP trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check HPP's competition here
NYC vs BDN Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 540.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while BDN trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check BDN's competition here
NYC vs CIO-PA Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CIO-PA's competition here
NYC vs CIO Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CIO's competition here
NYC vs OPINL Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OPINL's competition here
NYC vs ELME Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 182.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while ELME trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ELME's competition here
NYC vs NLOP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while NLOP trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check NLOP's competition here
NYC vs EQC Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check EQC's competition here
NYC vs ONL Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while ONL trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ONL's competition here
NYC vs FSP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while FSP trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check FSP's competition here
NYC vs OPI Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OPI's competition here
NYC vs EQC-PD Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check EQC-PD's competition here
NYC vs CMCT Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 36.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while CMCT trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CMCT's competition here
NYC vs DTLA-P Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DTLA-P's competition here
NYC vs CMCTP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CMCTP's competition here
NYC vs PKY Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, PKY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while PKY trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas PKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to PKY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to PKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check PKY's competition here
NYC vs OFC Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 25.2M. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.58, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -1.08, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.36%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OFC's competition here