American Strategic Investment Co.
American Strategic Investment Co. (NYC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NYC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYC | $8.22 | +0.06% | 22.1M | -0.99 | -$8.32 | N/A |
| DLR | $199.68 | +1.52% | 69.7B | 52.95 | $3.77 | +2.44% |
| DLR-PK | $22.85 | +0.40% | 54.1B | 4.73 | $4.83 | +2.44% |
| BXP | $59.84 | +2.24% | 9.5B | 30.07 | $1.99 | +5.12% |
| ARE | $45.83 | +4.63% | 8B | -7.31 | -$6.27 | +8.87% |
| VNO-PM | $17.53 | +1.74% | 7.1B | 27.14 | $0.64 | +2.35% |
| VNO-PL | $17.65 | +1.03% | 7.1B | 27.45 | $0.64 | +2.35% |
| DLR-PL | $20.23 | +0.80% | 6.9B | 4.17 | $4.83 | +2.44% |
| VNO | $31.56 | +4.30% | 5.9B | 8.65 | $3.65 | +2.35% |
| HPP-PC | $14.50 | +0.07% | 5.6B | -118.15 | -$0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NYC vs DLR Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while DLR trades at $199.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 52.95. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DLR's competition here
NYC vs DLR-PK Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while DLR-PK trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DLR-PK's competition here
NYC vs BXP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while BXP trades at $59.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check BXP's competition here
NYC vs ARE Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while ARE trades at $45.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ARE's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PM Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while VNO-PM trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PM's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PL Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while VNO-PL trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PL's competition here
NYC vs DLR-PL Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while DLR-PL trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DLR-PL's competition here
NYC vs VNO Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while VNO trades at $31.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO's competition here
NYC vs HPP-PC Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while HPP-PC trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -118.15. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check HPP-PC's competition here
NYC vs CUZ Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while CUZ trades at $26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is -892.67. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CUZ's competition here
NYC vs KRC Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while KRC trades at $35.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check KRC's competition here
NYC vs SLG-PI Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while SLG-PI trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check SLG-PI's competition here
NYC vs CDP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while CDP trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CDP's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PN Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while VNO-PN trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PN's competition here
NYC vs SLG Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while SLG trades at $44.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check SLG's competition here
NYC vs VNO-PO Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while VNO-PO trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check VNO-PO's competition here
NYC vs HIW Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while HIW trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check HIW's competition here
NYC vs DEI Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while DEI trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 135.11. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DEI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DEI's competition here
NYC vs CLI Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CLI's competition here
NYC vs WRE Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check WRE's competition here
NYC vs FISK Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while FISK trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC and FISK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FISK's competition here
NYC vs PGRE Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check PGRE's competition here
NYC vs OGCP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while OGCP trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OGCP's competition here
NYC vs ESBA Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while ESBA trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ESBA's competition here
NYC vs DEA Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while DEA trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 105.86. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DEA's competition here
NYC vs PDM Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while PDM trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check PDM's competition here
NYC vs JBGS Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 932.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while JBGS trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check JBGS's competition here
NYC vs PSTL Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 801.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while PSTL trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 49.34. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check PSTL's competition here
NYC vs CXP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CXP's competition here
NYC vs HPP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 576.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while HPP trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check HPP's competition here
NYC vs BDN Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while BDN trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check BDN's competition here
NYC vs CIO-PA Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CIO-PA's competition here
NYC vs CIO Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CIO's competition here
NYC vs OPINL Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OPINL's competition here
NYC vs ELME Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while ELME trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ELME's competition here
NYC vs NLOP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while NLOP trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check NLOP's competition here
NYC vs EQC Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check EQC's competition here
NYC vs ONL Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while ONL trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check ONL's competition here
NYC vs FSP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while FSP trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check FSP's competition here
NYC vs OPI Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OPI's competition here
NYC vs EQC-PD Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check EQC-PD's competition here
NYC vs CMCT Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 43.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while CMCT trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CMCT's competition here
NYC vs CMCTP Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check CMCTP's competition here
NYC vs DTLA-P Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check DTLA-P's competition here
NYC vs PKY Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, PKY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while PKY trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas PKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PKY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to PKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check PKY's competition here
NYC vs OFC Comparison May 2026
NYC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NYC stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NYC is priced at $8.22, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NYC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.99, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, NYC's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NYC is less volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NYC.Check OFC's competition here