Empire State Realty OP, L.P.
Empire State Realty OP, L.P. (FISK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FISK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FISK | $5.40 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 21.60 | $0.25 | +2.47% |
| DLR | $199.68 | +1.52% | 69.7B | 52.95 | $3.77 | +2.44% |
| DLR-PK | $22.85 | +0.40% | 54.1B | 4.73 | $4.83 | +2.44% |
| BXP | $59.84 | +2.24% | 9.5B | 30.07 | $1.99 | +5.12% |
| ARE | $45.83 | +4.63% | 8B | -7.31 | -$6.27 | +8.87% |
| VNO-PM | $17.53 | +1.74% | 7.1B | 27.14 | $0.64 | +2.35% |
| VNO-PL | $17.65 | +1.03% | 7.1B | 27.45 | $0.64 | +2.35% |
| DLR-PL | $20.23 | +0.80% | 6.9B | 4.17 | $4.83 | +2.44% |
| VNO | $31.56 | +4.30% | 5.9B | 8.65 | $3.65 | +2.35% |
| HPP-PC | $14.50 | +0.07% | 5.6B | -118.15 | -$0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FISK vs DLR Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while DLR trades at $199.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 52.95. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DLR's competition here
FISK vs DLR-PK Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while DLR-PK trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DLR-PK's competition here
FISK vs BXP Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while BXP trades at $59.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check BXP's competition here
FISK vs ARE Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while ARE trades at $45.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check ARE's competition here
FISK vs VNO-PM Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while VNO-PM trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check VNO-PM's competition here
FISK vs VNO-PL Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while VNO-PL trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check VNO-PL's competition here
FISK vs DLR-PL Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while DLR-PL trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DLR-PL's competition here
FISK vs VNO Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while VNO trades at $31.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check VNO's competition here
FISK vs HPP-PC Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while HPP-PC trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -118.15. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check HPP-PC's competition here
FISK vs CUZ Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while CUZ trades at $26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is -892.67. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CUZ's competition here
FISK vs KRC Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while KRC trades at $35.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check KRC's competition here
FISK vs SLG-PI Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while SLG-PI trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check SLG-PI's competition here
FISK vs CDP Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while CDP trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CDP's competition here
FISK vs VNO-PN Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while VNO-PN trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check VNO-PN's competition here
FISK vs SLG Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while SLG trades at $44.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check SLG's competition here
FISK vs VNO-PO Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while VNO-PO trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check VNO-PO's competition here
FISK vs HIW Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while HIW trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check HIW's competition here
FISK vs DEI Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while DEI trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 135.11. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DEI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DEI's competition here
FISK vs CLI Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CLI's competition here
FISK vs WRE Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check WRE's competition here
FISK vs PGRE Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check PGRE's competition here
FISK vs OGCP Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while OGCP trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check OGCP's competition here
FISK vs ESBA Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while ESBA trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check ESBA's competition here
FISK vs DEA Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while DEA trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 105.86. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DEA's competition here
FISK vs PDM Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while PDM trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check PDM's competition here
FISK vs JBGS Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 932.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while JBGS trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check JBGS's competition here
FISK vs PSTL Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 801.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while PSTL trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 49.34. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check PSTL's competition here
FISK vs CXP Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CXP's competition here
FISK vs HPP Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 576.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while HPP trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check HPP's competition here
FISK vs BDN Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while BDN trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check BDN's competition here
FISK vs CIO-PA Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CIO-PA's competition here
FISK vs CIO Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CIO's competition here
FISK vs OPINL Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check OPINL's competition here
FISK vs ELME Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while ELME trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check ELME's competition here
FISK vs NLOP Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while NLOP trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check NLOP's competition here
FISK vs EQC Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check EQC's competition here
FISK vs ONL Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while ONL trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check ONL's competition here
FISK vs FSP Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while FSP trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check FSP's competition here
FISK vs NYC Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while NYC trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK and NYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NYC's competition here
FISK vs OPI Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check OPI's competition here
FISK vs EQC-PD Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check EQC-PD's competition here
FISK vs CMCT Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 43.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while CMCT trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CMCT's competition here
FISK vs CMCTP Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CMCTP's competition here
FISK vs DTLA-P Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DTLA-P's competition here
FISK vs PKY Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PKY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while PKY trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas PKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PKY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to PKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check PKY's competition here
FISK vs OFC Comparison May 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.40, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.60, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check OFC's competition here