Empire State Realty OP, L.P.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FISK
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FISK
Empire State Realty OP, L.P. (FISK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FISK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FISK | $5.03 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 20.12 | $0.25 | +2.68% |
| DLR | $191.85 | +1.58% | 65.9B | 53.57 | $3.58 | +2.56% |
| DLR-PK | $22.38 | +0.45% | 53B | 4.63 | $4.83 | +2.56% |
| BXP | $53.57 | +1.08% | 8.5B | 30.78 | $1.74 | +5.77% |
| ARE | $43.75 | +2.68% | 7.6B | -5.18 | -$8.44 | +9.41% |
| VNO-PM | $17.39 | +0.52% | 7.1B | 27.00 | $0.64 | +2.69% |
| VNO-PL | $17.53 | +1.21% | 7B | 27.22 | $0.64 | +2.69% |
| DLR-PL | $19.87 | +0.61% | 6.8B | 4.11 | $4.83 | +2.56% |
| HPP-PC | $13.94 | +3.18% | 5.3B | -112.42 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| VNO | $27.54 | +1.40% | 5.2B | 6.55 | $4.20 | +2.69% |
Stock Comparison
FISK vs DLR Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while DLR trades at $191.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 53.57. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DLR's competition here
FISK vs DLR-PK Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while DLR-PK trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DLR-PK's competition here
FISK vs BXP Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while BXP trades at $53.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check BXP's competition here
FISK vs ARE Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while ARE trades at $43.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check ARE's competition here
FISK vs VNO-PM Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while VNO-PM trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check VNO-PM's competition here
FISK vs VNO-PL Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while VNO-PL trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check VNO-PL's competition here
FISK vs DLR-PL Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while DLR-PL trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DLR-PL's competition here
FISK vs HPP-PC Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while HPP-PC trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -112.42. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check HPP-PC's competition here
FISK vs VNO Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while VNO trades at $27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check VNO's competition here
FISK vs CUZ Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while CUZ trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 96.25. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CUZ's competition here
FISK vs SLG-PI Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while SLG-PI trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check SLG-PI's competition here
FISK vs CDP Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while CDP trades at $32.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CDP's competition here
FISK vs KRC Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while KRC trades at $28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check KRC's competition here
FISK vs VNO-PN Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while VNO-PN trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check VNO-PN's competition here
FISK vs VNO-PO Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while VNO-PO trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check VNO-PO's competition here
FISK vs SLG Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while SLG trades at $39.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -24.26. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check SLG's competition here
FISK vs HIW Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while HIW trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check HIW's competition here
FISK vs CLI Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CLI's competition here
FISK vs DEI Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while DEI trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 107.50. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DEI's competition here
FISK vs WRE Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check WRE's competition here
FISK vs PGRE Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check PGRE's competition here
FISK vs OGCP Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while OGCP trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK and OGCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OGCP's competition here
FISK vs ESBA Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while ESBA trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check ESBA's competition here
FISK vs DEA Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while DEA trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 85.85. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DEA's competition here
FISK vs PDM Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 901.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while PDM trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check PDM's competition here
FISK vs JBGS Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 880.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while JBGS trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check JBGS's competition here
FISK vs CXP Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CXP's competition here
FISK vs PSTL Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 679M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while PSTL trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check PSTL's competition here
FISK vs BDN Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 464.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while BDN trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check BDN's competition here
FISK vs HPP Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 329.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while HPP trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check HPP's competition here
FISK vs CIO-PA Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CIO-PA's competition here
FISK vs CIO Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CIO's competition here
FISK vs OPINL Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check OPINL's competition here
FISK vs ELME Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 190.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while ELME trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check ELME's competition here
FISK vs NLOP Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 175.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while NLOP trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check NLOP's competition here
FISK vs EQC Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check EQC's competition here
FISK vs ONL Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while ONL trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check ONL's competition here
FISK vs FSP Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while FSP trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check FSP's competition here
FISK vs NYC Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while NYC trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check NYC's competition here
FISK vs OPI Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check OPI's competition here
FISK vs EQC-PD Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check EQC-PD's competition here
FISK vs CMCT Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 72.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while CMCT trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CMCT's competition here
FISK vs CMCTP Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check CMCTP's competition here
FISK vs PKY Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PKY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while PKY trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas PKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PKY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to PKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check PKY's competition here
FISK vs DTLA-P Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check DTLA-P's competition here
FISK vs OFC Comparison April 2026
FISK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FISK stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FISK is priced at $5.03, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FISK currently has a P/E ratio of 20.12, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, FISK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FISK is less volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISK.Check OFC's competition here