City Office REIT, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CIO-PA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CIO-PA
City Office REIT, Inc. (CIO-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CIO-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIO-PA | $25.37 | +0.16% | 285.1M | 2.48 | $10.22 | +1.43% |
| DLR | $195.79 | +2.05% | 67.3B | 54.54 | $3.59 | +2.49% |
| DLR-PK | $22.61 | +1.03% | 53.5B | 4.68 | $4.83 | +2.49% |
| BXP | $55.03 | +2.73% | 8.7B | 31.64 | $1.74 | +5.61% |
| ARE | $45.39 | +3.75% | 7.9B | -5.38 | -$8.44 | +9.05% |
| VNO-PM | $17.54 | +0.86% | 7.1B | 27.24 | $0.64 | +2.65% |
| VNO-PL | $17.76 | +1.31% | 7B | 27.41 | $0.64 | +2.65% |
| DLR-PL | $19.87 | +0.00% | 6.8B | 4.11 | $4.83 | +2.49% |
| HPP-PC | $14.40 | +3.30% | 5.6B | -119.03 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| VNO | $27.97 | +1.56% | 5.3B | 6.66 | $4.20 | +2.65% |
Stock Comparison
CIO-PA vs DLR Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while DLR trades at $195.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 54.54. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check DLR's competition here
CIO-PA vs DLR-PK Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while DLR-PK trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check DLR-PK's competition here
CIO-PA vs BXP Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while BXP trades at $55.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check BXP's competition here
CIO-PA vs ARE Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while ARE trades at $45.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check ARE's competition here
CIO-PA vs VNO-PM Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while VNO-PM trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check VNO-PM's competition here
CIO-PA vs VNO-PL Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while VNO-PL trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check VNO-PL's competition here
CIO-PA vs DLR-PL Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while DLR-PL trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check DLR-PL's competition here
CIO-PA vs HPP-PC Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while HPP-PC trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -119.03. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check HPP-PC's competition here
CIO-PA vs VNO Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while VNO trades at $27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check VNO's competition here
CIO-PA vs CUZ Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while CUZ trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check CUZ's competition here
CIO-PA vs SLG-PI Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while SLG-PI trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check SLG-PI's competition here
CIO-PA vs CDP Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while CDP trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check CDP's competition here
CIO-PA vs KRC Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while KRC trades at $29.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check KRC's competition here
CIO-PA vs VNO-PN Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while VNO-PN trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check VNO-PN's competition here
CIO-PA vs VNO-PO Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while VNO-PO trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check VNO-PO's competition here
CIO-PA vs SLG Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while SLG trades at $40.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check SLG's competition here
CIO-PA vs HIW Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while HIW trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check HIW's competition here
CIO-PA vs CLI Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check CLI's competition here
CIO-PA vs DEI Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while DEI trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 109.56. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check DEI's competition here
CIO-PA vs WRE Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check WRE's competition here
CIO-PA vs PGRE Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check PGRE's competition here
CIO-PA vs FISK Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while FISK trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check FISK's competition here
CIO-PA vs OGCP Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while OGCP trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check OGCP's competition here
CIO-PA vs ESBA Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while ESBA trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check ESBA's competition here
CIO-PA vs DEA Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while DEA trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 85.96. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check DEA's competition here
CIO-PA vs PDM Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 933.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while PDM trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check PDM's competition here
CIO-PA vs JBGS Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 893.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while JBGS trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check JBGS's competition here
CIO-PA vs CXP Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check CXP's competition here
CIO-PA vs PSTL Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 683.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while PSTL trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 42.08. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check PSTL's competition here
CIO-PA vs BDN Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while BDN trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check BDN's competition here
CIO-PA vs HPP Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 333.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while HPP trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check HPP's competition here
CIO-PA vs CIO Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check CIO's competition here
CIO-PA vs OPINL Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check OPINL's competition here
CIO-PA vs ELME Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 192.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while ELME trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check ELME's competition here
CIO-PA vs NLOP Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 179.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while NLOP trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check NLOP's competition here
CIO-PA vs EQC Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check EQC's competition here
CIO-PA vs ONL Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 143.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while ONL trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check ONL's competition here
CIO-PA vs FSP Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while FSP trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check FSP's competition here
CIO-PA vs NYC Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while NYC trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check NYC's competition here
CIO-PA vs OPI Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check OPI's competition here
CIO-PA vs EQC-PD Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check EQC-PD's competition here
CIO-PA vs CMCT Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 63.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while CMCT trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check CMCT's competition here
CIO-PA vs CMCTP Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check CMCTP's competition here
CIO-PA vs DTLA-P Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check DTLA-P's competition here
CIO-PA vs PKY Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, PKY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while PKY trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas PKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PKY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is more volatile compared to PKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check PKY's competition here
CIO-PA vs OFC Comparison April 2026
CIO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIO-PA stands at 285.1M. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIO-PA is priced at $25.37, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.48, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, CIO-PA's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIO-PA is less volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIO-PA.Check OFC's competition here