Elme Communities

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while DLR trades at $188.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 52.75. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check DLR's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while DLR-PK trades at $22.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check DLR-PK's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while BXP trades at $53.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check BXP's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while ARE trades at $42.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check ARE's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while VNO-PM trades at $17.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check VNO-PM's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while VNO-PL trades at $17.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check VNO-PL's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while DLR-PL trades at $19.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check DLR-PL's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while VNO trades at $27.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check VNO's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while HPP-PC trades at $13.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -108.95. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check HPP-PC's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while CUZ trades at $22.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 95.38. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check CUZ's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while SLG-PI trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check SLG-PI's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while CDP trades at $32.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check CDP's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while KRC trades at $28.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check KRC's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while VNO-PN trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check VNO-PN's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while VNO-PO trades at $15.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check VNO-PO's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while SLG trades at $38.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -23.86. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check SLG's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while HIW trades at $22.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check HIW's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while CLI trades at $18.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check CLI's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while DEI trades at $9.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 107.61. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check DEI's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while WRE trades at $17.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check WRE's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while PGRE trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check PGRE's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while FISK trades at $5.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check FISK's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while ESBA trades at $5.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check ESBA's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while OGCP trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check OGCP's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while DEA trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 85.35. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check DEA's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 890.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while PDM trades at $7.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check PDM's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 862.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while JBGS trades at $14.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check JBGS's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while CXP trades at $19.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check CXP's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 693.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while PSTL trades at $20.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 42.68. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check PSTL's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 460.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while BDN trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check BDN's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 323.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while HPP trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check HPP's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check CIO-PA's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while CIO trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check CIO's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while OPINL trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check OPINL's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while NLOP trades at $11.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check NLOP's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while EQC trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check EQC's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 133.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while ONL trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check ONL's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while FSP trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check FSP's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while NYC trades at $8.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check NYC's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while OPI trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check OPI's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check EQC-PD's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 39.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while CMCT trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check CMCT's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check CMCTP's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check DTLA-P's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, PKY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while PKY trades at $19.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas PKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PKY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to PKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check PKY's competition here

ELME plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELME stands at 190.2M. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELME is priced at $2.12, while OFC trades at $24.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELME currently has a P/E ratio of -1.40, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, ELME's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELME is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELME.Check OFC's competition here