Virco Mfg. Corporation
Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VIRC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIRC | $7.98 | -5.90% | 125.6M | 6.44 | $1.24 | +1.24% |
| SN | $118.55 | -1.22% | 16.6B | 37.52 | $3.16 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.85% |
| MHK | $121.31 | +1.09% | 7.5B | 16.12 | $7.53 | N/A |
| WHR | $84.76 | -13.43% | 4.7B | -31.75 | -$2.67 | +8.30% |
| PATK | $101.29 | +1.31% | 3.4B | 24.35 | $4.16 | +1.94% |
| LZB | $37.40 | -2.15% | 1.5B | 15.92 | $2.35 | +2.30% |
| MBC | $11.54 | -1.20% | 1.5B | 14.99 | $0.77 | N/A |
| LEG | $10.05 | -1.95% | 1.4B | -2.69 | -$3.74 | +1.98% |
| MLKN | $19.62 | -3.02% | 1.3B | -36.33 | -$0.54 | +3.81% |
Stock Comparison
VIRC vs SN Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while SN trades at $118.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 37.52. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check SN's competition here
VIRC vs TPX Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check TPX's competition here
VIRC vs MHK Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while MHK trades at $121.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check MHK's competition here
VIRC vs WHR Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while WHR trades at $84.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is -31.75. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check WHR's competition here
VIRC vs PATK Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while PATK trades at $101.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check PATK's competition here
VIRC vs LZB Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while LZB trades at $37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check LZB's competition here
VIRC vs MBC Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while MBC trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check MBC's competition here
VIRC vs LEG Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while LEG trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LEG's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check LEG's competition here
VIRC vs MLKN Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while MLKN trades at $19.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is -36.33. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLKN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check MLKN's competition here
VIRC vs TILE Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while TILE trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check TILE's competition here
VIRC vs AMWD Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 805.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while AMWD trades at $55.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check AMWD's competition here
VIRC vs ETD Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 743.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while ETD trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check ETD's competition here
VIRC vs LOVE Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 271.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while LOVE trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check LOVE's competition here
VIRC vs COOK Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 245.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while COOK trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check COOK's competition here
VIRC vs HBB Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 223.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while HBB trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check HBB's competition here
VIRC vs VIOT Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while VIOT trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check VIOT's competition here
VIRC vs FLXS Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 188.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while FLXS trades at $35.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check FLXS's competition here
VIRC vs SNBR Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 184.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while SNBR trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check SNBR's competition here
VIRC vs KEQU Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 172.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while KEQU trades at $58.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check KEQU's competition here
VIRC vs BSET Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while BSET trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check BSET's competition here
VIRC vs IRBT Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while IRBT trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is less volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check IRBT's competition here
VIRC vs HOFT Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while HOFT trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check HOFT's competition here
VIRC vs LCUT Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while LCUT trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check LCUT's competition here
VIRC vs PRPL Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while PRPL trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check PRPL's competition here
VIRC vs NVFY Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while NVFY trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check NVFY's competition here
VIRC vs CRWS Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while CRWS trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check CRWS's competition here
VIRC vs NTZ Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while NTZ trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check NTZ's competition here
VIRC vs NCL Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while NCL trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCL's ROE of -3.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check NCL's competition here
VIRC vs ATER Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while ATER trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check ATER's competition here
VIRC vs EFOI Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while EFOI trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check EFOI's competition here
VIRC vs FGI Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while FGI trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check FGI's competition here
VIRC vs AUVI Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check AUVI's competition here
VIRC vs AUVIP Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check AUVIP's competition here
VIRC vs FGIWW Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 348.2K. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check FGIWW's competition here
VIRC vs WEBR Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check WEBR's competition here
VIRC vs KBAL Comparison July 2025
VIRC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIRC stands at 125.6M. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIRC is priced at $7.98, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIRC currently has a P/E ratio of 6.44, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, VIRC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIRC is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIRC.Check KBAL's competition here