Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FLXS
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLXS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLXS | $50.62 | +9.44% | 267.5M | 9.13 | $5.48 | +0.82% |
| SN | $117.98 | -3.02% | 16.7B | 23.93 | $4.94 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.94% |
| MHK | $107.60 | -1.75% | 6.7B | 18.36 | $5.93 | N/A |
| ALH | $24.92 | -5.34% | 4.4B | 46.05 | $0.56 | N/A |
| WHR | $55.59 | -2.90% | 3.7B | 10.05 | $5.66 | +7.77% |
| PATK | $100.54 | -3.08% | 3.4B | 26.57 | $3.90 | +0.91% |
| TILE | $28.28 | -0.42% | 1.6B | 14.35 | $1.96 | +0.28% |
| LEG | $11.42 | -4.80% | 1.6B | 6.90 | $1.69 | +0.85% |
| LZB | $36.09 | -0.04% | 1.5B | 18.20 | $2.00 | +1.33% |
Stock Comparison
FLXS vs SN Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while SN trades at $117.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check SN's competition here
FLXS vs TPX Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check TPX's competition here
FLXS vs MHK Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while MHK trades at $107.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check MHK's competition here
FLXS vs ALH Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while ALH trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 46.05. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALH's ROE of -4.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to ALH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check ALH's competition here
FLXS vs WHR Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while WHR trades at $55.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check WHR's competition here
FLXS vs PATK Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while PATK trades at $100.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check PATK's competition here
FLXS vs TILE Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while TILE trades at $28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check TILE's competition here
FLXS vs LEG Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while LEG trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check LEG's competition here
FLXS vs LZB Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while LZB trades at $36.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS and LZB have similar daily volatility (1.94).Check LZB's competition here
FLXS vs MLKN Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while MLKN trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 116.13. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check MLKN's competition here
FLXS vs MBC Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while MBC trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 43.24. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check MBC's competition here
FLXS vs AMWD Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 636.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while AMWD trades at $44.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check AMWD's competition here
FLXS vs ETD Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while ETD trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check ETD's competition here
FLXS vs XWIN Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, XWIN has a market cap of 346M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while XWIN trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas XWIN's P/E ratio is -43.12. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XWIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to XWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check XWIN's competition here
FLXS vs HBB Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while HBB trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check HBB's competition here
FLXS vs LOVE Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 248.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while LOVE trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 60.61. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check LOVE's competition here
FLXS vs LCUT Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while LCUT trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check LCUT's competition here
FLXS vs HOFT Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while HOFT trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check HOFT's competition here
FLXS vs BSET Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 128.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while BSET trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check BSET's competition here
FLXS vs COOK Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while COOK trades at $36.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check COOK's competition here
FLXS vs KEQU Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while KEQU trades at $36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check KEQU's competition here
FLXS vs VIRC Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while VIRC trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 38.06. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check VIRC's competition here
FLXS vs NVFY Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while NVFY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check NVFY's competition here
FLXS vs VIOT Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while VIOT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check VIOT's competition here
FLXS vs PRPL Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while PRPL trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRPL's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check PRPL's competition here
FLXS vs SNBR Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while SNBR trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check SNBR's competition here
FLXS vs NTZ Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while NTZ trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check NTZ's competition here
FLXS vs CRWS Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while CRWS trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check CRWS's competition here
FLXS vs EFOI Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while EFOI trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -25.17. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check EFOI's competition here
FLXS vs FGI Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while FGI trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check FGI's competition here
FLXS vs NCL Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while NCL trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCL's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check NCL's competition here
FLXS vs ATER Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while ATER trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check ATER's competition here
FLXS vs IRBT Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while IRBT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -32.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check IRBT's competition here
FLXS vs AUVIP Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check AUVIP's competition here
FLXS vs AUVI Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check AUVI's competition here
FLXS vs FGIWW Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 88.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check FGIWW's competition here
FLXS vs WEBR Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check WEBR's competition here
FLXS vs KBAL Comparison April 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 267.5M. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $50.62, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check KBAL's competition here