Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLXS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLXS | $72.91 | +6.02% | 390.5M | 14.50 | $5.03 | +1.19% |
| SN | $145.10 | +1.58% | 20.6B | 26.45 | $5.49 | N/A |
| MAS | $79.97 | +0.31% | 16.1B | 19.36 | $4.13 | +1.58% |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.97% |
| MHK | $119.76 | -1.02% | 7.3B | 12.83 | $9.34 | N/A |
| ALH | $26.49 | +0.46% | 4.5B | 31.93 | $0.83 | N/A |
| PATK | $95.33 | +2.86% | 3.1B | 21.42 | $4.45 | +1.92% |
| WHR | $38.98 | +3.29% | 2.5B | 9.82 | $3.97 | +11.42% |
| LZB | $40.95 | +0.37% | 1.6B | 13.44 | $3.05 | +2.31% |
| LEG | $11.67 | +0.60% | 1.6B | 12.12 | $0.96 | +1.72% |
Stock Comparison
FLXS vs SN Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while SN trades at $145.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check SN's competition here
FLXS vs MAS Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while MAS trades at $79.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAS's ROE of -5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check MAS's competition here
FLXS vs TPX Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check TPX's competition here
FLXS vs MHK Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while MHK trades at $119.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check MHK's competition here
FLXS vs ALH Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while ALH trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALH's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check ALH's competition here
FLXS vs PATK Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while PATK trades at $95.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check PATK's competition here
FLXS vs WHR Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while WHR trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check WHR's competition here
FLXS vs LZB Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while LZB trades at $40.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check LZB's competition here
FLXS vs LEG Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while LEG trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check LEG's competition here
FLXS vs MLKN Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while MLKN trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check MLKN's competition here
FLXS vs MBC Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while MBC trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MBC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check MBC's competition here
FLXS vs AMWD Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while AMWD trades at $48.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check AMWD's competition here
FLXS vs ETD Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 573.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while ETD trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check ETD's competition here
FLXS vs XMAX Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, XMAX has a market cap of 557.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while XMAX trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas XMAX's P/E ratio is -52.99. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XMAX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to XMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check XMAX's competition here
FLXS vs XWIN Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, XWIN has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while XWIN trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas XWIN's P/E ratio is -58.86. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XWIN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to XWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check XWIN's competition here
FLXS vs HBB Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 281.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while HBB trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check HBB's competition here
FLXS vs LOVE Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 247.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while LOVE trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 65.12. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check LOVE's competition here
FLXS vs COOK Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 222.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while COOK trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check COOK's competition here
FLXS vs HOFT Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while HOFT trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is 65.77. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check HOFT's competition here
FLXS vs LCUT Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while LCUT trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check LCUT's competition here
FLXS vs BSET Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 149.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while BSET trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check BSET's competition here
FLXS vs KEQU Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 102.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while KEQU trades at $35.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check KEQU's competition here
FLXS vs VIRC Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 99.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while VIRC trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is -634.50. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIRC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check VIRC's competition here
FLXS vs NVFY Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while NVFY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check NVFY's competition here
FLXS vs VIOT Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while VIOT trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check VIOT's competition here
FLXS vs PRPL Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while PRPL trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRPL's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check PRPL's competition here
FLXS vs CRWS Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while CRWS trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRWS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check CRWS's competition here
FLXS vs NTZ Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while NTZ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check NTZ's competition here
FLXS vs EFOI Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while EFOI trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -19.73. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check EFOI's competition here
FLXS vs NCL Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while NCL trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check NCL's competition here
FLXS vs ATER Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while ATER trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATER's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check ATER's competition here
FLXS vs RAY Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while RAY trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check RAY's competition here
FLXS vs SNBR Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while SNBR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check SNBR's competition here
FLXS vs IRBT Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while IRBT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -32.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check IRBT's competition here
FLXS vs AUVI Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check AUVI's competition here
FLXS vs AUVIP Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check AUVIP's competition here
FLXS vs KBAL Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check KBAL's competition here
FLXS vs WEBR Comparison June 2026
FLXS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLXS stands at 390.5M. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLXS is priced at $72.91, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLXS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FLXS is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLXS.Check WEBR's competition here