Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See HOFT's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for HOFT and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOFT | $14.27 | +4.54% | 153.3M | 54.88 | $0.26 | +4.11% |
| SN | $147.82 | -3.28% | 20.9B | 26.92 | $5.49 | N/A |
| SGI | $69.93 | -0.53% | 14.7B | 25.05 | $2.79 | +0.92% |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.97% |
| MHK | $108.28 | +0.26% | 6.6B | 11.59 | $9.34 | N/A |
| ALH | $24.61 | +0.29% | 4.2B | 29.65 | $0.83 | N/A |
| PATK | $85.33 | -2.37% | 2.8B | 19.18 | $4.45 | +2.12% |
| WHR | $36.44 | -1.27% | 2.4B | 9.17 | $3.97 | +12.17% |
| LZB | $39.22 | -1.75% | 1.6B | 12.86 | $3.05 | +2.42% |
| LEG | $10.68 | -0.28% | 1.5B | 11.11 | $0.96 | +1.87% |
Stock Comparison
SharkNinja, Inc. (NYSE: SN)
HOFT vs SN Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while SN trades at $147.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is less volatile compared to SN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check SN's competition here
Somnigroup International Inc (NYSE: SGI)
HOFT vs SGI Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while SGI trades at $69.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to SGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check SGI's competition here
Tempur Sealy International, Inc. (NYSE: TPX)
HOFT vs TPX Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check TPX's competition here
Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK)
HOFT vs MHK Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while MHK trades at $108.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check MHK's competition here
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (NYSE: ALH)
HOFT vs ALH Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while ALH trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALH's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check ALH's competition here
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK)
HOFT vs PATK Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while PATK trades at $85.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check PATK's competition here
Whirlpool Corporation (NYSE: WHR)
HOFT vs WHR Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while WHR trades at $36.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to WHR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check WHR's competition here
La-Z-Boy Incorporated (NYSE: LZB)
HOFT vs LZB Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while LZB trades at $39.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check LZB's competition here
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (NYSE: LEG)
HOFT vs LEG Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while LEG trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check LEG's competition here
MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLKN)
HOFT vs MLKN Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while MLKN trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check MLKN's competition here
MasterBrand, Inc. (NYSE: MBC)
HOFT vs MBC Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while MBC trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MBC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to MBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check MBC's competition here
American Woodmark Corporation (NASDAQ: AMWD)
HOFT vs AMWD Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while AMWD trades at $48.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check AMWD's competition here
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (NYSE: ETD)
HOFT vs ETD Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 581.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while ETD trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check ETD's competition here
XMAX, Inc. (NASDAQ: XMAX)
HOFT vs XMAX Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, XMAX has a market cap of 548.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while XMAX trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas XMAX's P/E ratio is -52.15. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to XMAX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to XMAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check XMAX's competition here
Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLXS)
HOFT vs FLXS Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 401.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while FLXS trades at $74.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is less volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check FLXS's competition here
Nova LifeStyle, Inc. (NASDAQ: XWIN)
HOFT vs XWIN Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, XWIN has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while XWIN trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas XWIN's P/E ratio is -58.86. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to XWIN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to XWIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check XWIN's competition here
Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (NYSE: HBB)
HOFT vs HBB Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while HBB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to HBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check HBB's competition here
The Lovesac Company (NASDAQ: LOVE)
HOFT vs LOVE Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while LOVE trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check LOVE's competition here
Lifetime Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCUT)
HOFT vs LCUT Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while LCUT trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check LCUT's competition here
Traeger, Inc. (NYSE: COOK)
HOFT vs COOK Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 189.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while COOK trades at $69.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check COOK's competition here
Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: BSET)
HOFT vs BSET Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while BSET trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check BSET's competition here
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (NASDAQ: KEQU)
HOFT vs KEQU Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while KEQU trades at $36.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check KEQU's competition here
Virco Mfg. Corporation (NASDAQ: VIRC)
HOFT vs VIRC Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while VIRC trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is -596.00. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VIRC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check VIRC's competition here
Nova LifeStyle, Inc. (NASDAQ: NVFY)
HOFT vs NVFY Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while NVFY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check NVFY's competition here
Viomi Technology Co., Ltd (NASDAQ: VIOT)
HOFT vs VIOT Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while VIOT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check VIOT's competition here
Crown Crafts, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRWS)
HOFT vs CRWS Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while CRWS trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CRWS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check CRWS's competition here
Purple Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRPL)
HOFT vs PRPL Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while PRPL trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PRPL's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check PRPL's competition here
Energy Focus, Inc. (NASDAQ: EFOI)
HOFT vs EFOI Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while EFOI trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -18.93. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check EFOI's competition here
Natuzzi S.p.A. (NYSE: NTZ)
HOFT vs NTZ Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while NTZ trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check NTZ's competition here
Northann Corp. (AMEX: NCL)
HOFT vs NCL Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while NCL trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NCL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check NCL's competition here
Aterian, Inc. (NASDAQ: ATER)
HOFT vs ATER Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while ATER trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ATER's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check ATER's competition here
Raytech Holding Limited (NASDAQ: RAY)
HOFT vs RAY Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while RAY trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check RAY's competition here
Sleep Number Corp (NASDAQ: SNBR)
HOFT vs SNBR Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while SNBR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check SNBR's competition here
iRobot Corporation (NASDAQ: IRBT)
HOFT vs IRBT Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while IRBT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IRBT's ROE of +11.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check IRBT's competition here
Applied UV, Inc. (NASDAQ: AUVI)
HOFT vs AUVI Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while AUVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check AUVI's competition here
Applied UV, Inc. (NASDAQ: AUVIP)
HOFT vs AUVIP Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 233. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while AUVIP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check AUVIP's competition here
Kimball International, Inc. (NASDAQ: KBAL)
HOFT vs KBAL Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check KBAL's competition here
Weber Inc. (NYSE: WEBR)
HOFT vs WEBR Comparison July 2026
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOFT stands at 153.3M. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOFT is priced at $14.27 on the NASDAQ, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOFT currently has a P/E ratio of 54.88, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOFT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HOFT is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOFT.Check WEBR's competition here