Patrick Industries, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for PATK
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PATK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATK | $106.93 | +3.92% | 3.6B | 27.42 | $3.90 | +1.61% |
| SN | $119.60 | +4.11% | 16.9B | 24.15 | $4.94 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.94% |
| MHK | $108.83 | +6.54% | 6.7B | 18.36 | $5.93 | N/A |
| ALH | $25.19 | +2.94% | 4.3B | 44.98 | $0.56 | N/A |
| WHR | $56.83 | +1.50% | 3.7B | 10.04 | $5.66 | +7.93% |
| TILE | $28.20 | +5.03% | 1.6B | 14.39 | $1.96 | +0.28% |
| LEG | $12.03 | +7.80% | 1.6B | 7.12 | $1.69 | +1.65% |
| LZB | $35.87 | +5.16% | 1.5B | 17.94 | $2.00 | +2.59% |
| MLKN | $17.24 | +5.96% | 1.2B | 114.93 | $0.15 | +4.35% |
Stock Comparison
PATK vs SN Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while SN trades at $119.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check SN's competition here
PATK vs TPX Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check TPX's competition here
PATK vs MHK Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while MHK trades at $108.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check MHK's competition here
PATK vs ALH Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while ALH trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 44.98. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALH's ROE of -4.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check ALH's competition here
PATK vs WHR Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while WHR trades at $56.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check WHR's competition here
PATK vs TILE Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while TILE trades at $28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check TILE's competition here
PATK vs LEG Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while LEG trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check LEG's competition here
PATK vs LZB Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while LZB trades at $35.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check LZB's competition here
PATK vs MLKN Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while MLKN trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 114.93. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check MLKN's competition here
PATK vs MBC Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while MBC trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check MBC's competition here
PATK vs AMWD Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 630.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while AMWD trades at $43.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 37.28. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check AMWD's competition here
PATK vs ETD Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 577.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while ETD trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check ETD's competition here
PATK vs XWIN Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, XWIN has a market cap of 313.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while XWIN trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas XWIN's P/E ratio is -42.82. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XWIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to XWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check XWIN's competition here
PATK vs HBB Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while HBB trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check HBB's competition here
PATK vs LOVE Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while LOVE trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 63.04. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check LOVE's competition here
PATK vs FLXS Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 249.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while FLXS trades at $46.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check FLXS's competition here
PATK vs LCUT Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while LCUT trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check LCUT's competition here
PATK vs HOFT Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 134.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while HOFT trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check HOFT's competition here
PATK vs BSET Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while BSET trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check BSET's competition here
PATK vs COOK Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while COOK trades at $43.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check COOK's competition here
PATK vs KEQU Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while KEQU trades at $36.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check KEQU's competition here
PATK vs VIRC Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while VIRC trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 39.81. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check VIRC's competition here
PATK vs NVFY Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while NVFY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check NVFY's competition here
PATK vs VIOT Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while VIOT trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check VIOT's competition here
PATK vs PRPL Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while PRPL trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRPL's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check PRPL's competition here
PATK vs SNBR Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while SNBR trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check SNBR's competition here
PATK vs EFOI Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while EFOI trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -36.06. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check EFOI's competition here
PATK vs NTZ Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while NTZ trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check NTZ's competition here
PATK vs CRWS Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while CRWS trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check CRWS's competition here
PATK vs NCL Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while NCL trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCL's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check NCL's competition here
PATK vs FGI Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while FGI trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check FGI's competition here
PATK vs ATER Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while ATER trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check ATER's competition here
PATK vs IRBT Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while IRBT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -32.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check IRBT's competition here
PATK vs AUVI Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check AUVI's competition here
PATK vs AUVIP Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check AUVIP's competition here
PATK vs FGIWW Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 65.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while FGIWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check FGIWW's competition here
PATK vs WEBR Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check WEBR's competition here
PATK vs KBAL Comparison April 2026
PATK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $106.93, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.42, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check KBAL's competition here