Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See PATK's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for PATK and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATK | $88.09 | -0.18% | 2.9B | 19.80 | $4.45 | +2.06% |
| SN | $154.53 | +0.21% | 21.9B | 28.14 | $5.49 | N/A |
| SGI | $72.73 | -3.30% | 15.3B | 26.07 | $2.79 | +0.88% |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.97% |
| MHK | $111.50 | -2.78% | 6.8B | 11.93 | $9.34 | N/A |
| ALH | $25.50 | -1.20% | 4.4B | 30.69 | $0.83 | N/A |
| WHR | $38.24 | -4.14% | 2.5B | 9.63 | $3.97 | +11.60% |
| LZB | $39.87 | -1.70% | 1.6B | 13.07 | $3.05 | +2.37% |
| LEG | $11.03 | -2.48% | 1.5B | 11.48 | $0.96 | +1.83% |
| MLKN | $21.82 | -0.68% | 1.5B | 11.73 | $1.86 | +3.48% |
Stock Comparison
SharkNinja, Inc. (NYSE: SN)
PATK vs SN Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while SN trades at $154.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check SN's competition here
Somnigroup International Inc (NYSE: SGI)
PATK vs SGI Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while SGI trades at $72.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check SGI's competition here
Tempur Sealy International, Inc. (NYSE: TPX)
PATK vs TPX Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check TPX's competition here
Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK)
PATK vs MHK Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while MHK trades at $111.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to MHK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check MHK's competition here
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (NYSE: ALH)
PATK vs ALH Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while ALH trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALH's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check ALH's competition here
Whirlpool Corporation (NYSE: WHR)
PATK vs WHR Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while WHR trades at $38.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check WHR's competition here
La-Z-Boy Incorporated (NYSE: LZB)
PATK vs LZB Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while LZB trades at $39.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check LZB's competition here
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (NYSE: LEG)
PATK vs LEG Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while LEG trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to LEG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check LEG's competition here
MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLKN)
PATK vs MLKN Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while MLKN trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check MLKN's competition here
MasterBrand, Inc. (NYSE: MBC)
PATK vs MBC Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while MBC trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check MBC's competition here
American Woodmark Corporation (NASDAQ: AMWD)
PATK vs AMWD Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while AMWD trades at $48.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check AMWD's competition here
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (NYSE: ETD)
PATK vs ETD Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while ETD trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check ETD's competition here
XMAX, Inc. (NASDAQ: XMAX)
PATK vs XMAX Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XMAX has a market cap of 541.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while XMAX trades at $8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas XMAX's P/E ratio is -51.48. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XMAX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to XMAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check XMAX's competition here
Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLXS)
PATK vs FLXS Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 390.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while FLXS trades at $72.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check FLXS's competition here
Nova LifeStyle, Inc. (NASDAQ: XWIN)
PATK vs XWIN Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XWIN has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while XWIN trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas XWIN's P/E ratio is -58.86. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XWIN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to XWIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check XWIN's competition here
Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (NYSE: HBB)
PATK vs HBB Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while HBB trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check HBB's competition here
The Lovesac Company (NASDAQ: LOVE)
PATK vs LOVE Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 266.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while LOVE trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 70.02. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check LOVE's competition here
Lifetime Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCUT)
PATK vs LCUT Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 194.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while LCUT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check LCUT's competition here
Traeger, Inc. (NYSE: COOK)
PATK vs COOK Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 194.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while COOK trades at $69.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is 38.59. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check COOK's competition here
Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: BSET)
PATK vs BSET Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while BSET trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check BSET's competition here
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (NASDAQ: HOFT)
PATK vs HOFT Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 151.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while HOFT trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check HOFT's competition here
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (NASDAQ: KEQU)
PATK vs KEQU Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while KEQU trades at $38.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check KEQU's competition here
Virco Mfg. Corporation (NASDAQ: VIRC)
PATK vs VIRC Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while VIRC trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is -617.00. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIRC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check VIRC's competition here
Nova LifeStyle, Inc. (NASDAQ: NVFY)
PATK vs NVFY Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while NVFY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check NVFY's competition here
Viomi Technology Co., Ltd (NASDAQ: VIOT)
PATK vs VIOT Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while VIOT trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check VIOT's competition here
Crown Crafts, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRWS)
PATK vs CRWS Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while CRWS trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRWS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check CRWS's competition here
Purple Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRPL)
PATK vs PRPL Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while PRPL trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRPL's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check PRPL's competition here
Energy Focus, Inc. (NASDAQ: EFOI)
PATK vs EFOI Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while EFOI trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -19.35. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check EFOI's competition here
Natuzzi S.p.A. (NYSE: NTZ)
PATK vs NTZ Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while NTZ trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check NTZ's competition here
Northann Corp. (AMEX: NCL)
PATK vs NCL Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while NCL trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check NCL's competition here
Aterian, Inc. (NASDAQ: ATER)
PATK vs ATER Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while ATER trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATER's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check ATER's competition here
Raytech Holding Limited (NASDAQ: RAY)
PATK vs RAY Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while RAY trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to RAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check RAY's competition here
Sleep Number Corp (NASDAQ: SNBR)
PATK vs SNBR Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while SNBR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check SNBR's competition here
iRobot Corporation (NASDAQ: IRBT)
PATK vs IRBT Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while IRBT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRBT's ROE of +11.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check IRBT's competition here
Applied UV, Inc. (NASDAQ: AUVI)
PATK vs AUVI Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while AUVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check AUVI's competition here
Applied UV, Inc. (NASDAQ: AUVIP)
PATK vs AUVIP Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 233. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while AUVIP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check AUVIP's competition here
Weber Inc. (NYSE: WEBR)
PATK vs WEBR Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check WEBR's competition here
Kimball International, Inc. (NASDAQ: KBAL)
PATK vs KBAL Comparison July 2026
Patrick Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: PATK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATK stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PATK is priced at $88.09 on the NASDAQ, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, PATK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PATK is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATK.Check KBAL's competition here