Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MHK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHK | $116.52 | -2.79% | 7.3B | 12.78 | $9.34 | N/A |
| SN | $148.78 | -2.02% | 21.4B | 27.59 | $5.49 | N/A |
| MAS | $81.09 | -0.67% | 16.7B | 20.04 | $4.13 | +1.52% |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.97% |
| ALH | $26.09 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 31.16 | $0.83 | N/A |
| PATK | $84.75 | -0.61% | 2.8B | 19.11 | $4.45 | +2.13% |
| WHR | $38.28 | -4.71% | 2.5B | 9.60 | $3.97 | +11.68% |
| LEG | $11.76 | +0.77% | 1.6B | 12.44 | $0.96 | +1.68% |
| LZB | $39.27 | -1.27% | 1.6B | 13.09 | $3.05 | +2.37% |
| MLKN | $21.01 | -0.81% | 1.5B | 11.52 | $1.86 | +3.50% |
Stock Comparison
MHK vs SN Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while SN trades at $148.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check SN's competition here
MHK vs MAS Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while MAS trades at $81.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAS's ROE of -5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check MAS's competition here
MHK vs TPX Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check TPX's competition here
MHK vs ALH Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while ALH trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALH's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check ALH's competition here
MHK vs PATK Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while PATK trades at $84.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check PATK's competition here
MHK vs WHR Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while WHR trades at $38.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check WHR's competition here
MHK vs LEG Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while LEG trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LEG's competition here
MHK vs LZB Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while LZB trades at $39.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LZB's competition here
MHK vs MLKN Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while MLKN trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check MLKN's competition here
MHK vs MBC Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while MBC trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check MBC's competition here
MHK vs AMWD Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while AMWD trades at $48.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check AMWD's competition here
MHK vs XMAX Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, XMAX has a market cap of 568.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while XMAX trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas XMAX's P/E ratio is -54.08. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XMAX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to XMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check XMAX's competition here
MHK vs ETD Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 551.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while ETD trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check ETD's competition here
MHK vs XWIN Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, XWIN has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while XWIN trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas XWIN's P/E ratio is -58.86. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XWIN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to XWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check XWIN's competition here
MHK vs FLXS Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 388.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while FLXS trades at $73.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check FLXS's competition here
MHK vs HBB Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 306.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while HBB trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check HBB's competition here
MHK vs LOVE Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 256M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while LOVE trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 67.27. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LOVE's competition here
MHK vs COOK Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 205.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while COOK trades at $68.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is 40.79. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check COOK's competition here
MHK vs LCUT Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 195.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while LCUT trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LCUT's competition here
MHK vs HOFT Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 180.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while HOFT trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check HOFT's competition here
MHK vs BSET Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while BSET trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 29.32. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check BSET's competition here
MHK vs KEQU Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while KEQU trades at $36.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check KEQU's competition here
MHK vs VIRC Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while VIRC trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is -633.00. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIRC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check VIRC's competition here
MHK vs NVFY Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while NVFY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check NVFY's competition here
MHK vs VIOT Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while VIOT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check VIOT's competition here
MHK vs PRPL Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while PRPL trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRPL's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check PRPL's competition here
MHK vs CRWS Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while CRWS trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRWS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check CRWS's competition here
MHK vs NTZ Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while NTZ trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check NTZ's competition here
MHK vs EFOI Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while EFOI trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check EFOI's competition here
MHK vs NCL Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while NCL trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check NCL's competition here
MHK vs ATER Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while ATER trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATER's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check ATER's competition here
MHK vs RAY Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while RAY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check RAY's competition here
MHK vs SNBR Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while SNBR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check SNBR's competition here
MHK vs IRBT Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while IRBT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -32.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check IRBT's competition here
MHK vs AUVI Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check AUVI's competition here
MHK vs AUVIP Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check AUVIP's competition here
MHK vs KBAL Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check KBAL's competition here
MHK vs WEBR Comparison July 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $116.52, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.78, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check WEBR's competition here