Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while SN trades at $153.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check SN's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while SGI trades at $72.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check SGI's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while TPX trades at $65.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check TPX's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while PATK trades at $84.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check PATK's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while WHR trades at $37.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check WHR's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, HNI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while HNI trades at $42.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas HNI's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HNI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HNI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check HNI's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while TILE trades at $33.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check TILE's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while LZB trades at $40.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LZB's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while MLKN trades at $22.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check MLKN's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while LEG trades at $10.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LEG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LEG's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while MBC trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check MBC's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while AMWD trades at $48.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check AMWD's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 592M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while ETD trades at $23.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check ETD's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, XMAX has a market cap of 536.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while XMAX trades at $8.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas XMAX's P/E ratio is -51.06. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XMAX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to XMAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check XMAX's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while FLXS trades at $75.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check FLXS's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, XWIN has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while XWIN trades at $8.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas XWIN's P/E ratio is -58.86. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XWIN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to XWIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check XWIN's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while HBB trades at $22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check HBB's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while LOVE trades at $16.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 65.35. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LOVE's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while LCUT trades at $8.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LCUT's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 170.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while COOK trades at $61.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check COOK's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 168.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while BSET trades at $19.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to BSET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check BSET's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 149.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while HOFT trades at $13.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is 53.38. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check HOFT's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while KEQU trades at $35.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check KEQU's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while VIRC trades at $6.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is -604.00. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIRC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check VIRC's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while NVFY trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check NVFY's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while VIOT trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check VIOT's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while PRPL trades at $8.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRPL's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check PRPL's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while CRWS trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRWS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check CRWS's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while HTLM trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check HTLM's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while EFOI trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -18.89. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check EFOI's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while NTZ trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check NTZ's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while NCL trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check NCL's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while FGI trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check FGI's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while RAY trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check RAY's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while ATER trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATER's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check ATER's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while SNBR trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check SNBR's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while IRBT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IRBT's ROE of +11.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check IRBT's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 467. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while AUVI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check AUVI's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 233. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while AUVIP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check AUVIP's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while KBAL trades at $12.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check KBAL's competition here

Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MHK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 7B. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $115.61 on the NYSE, while WEBR trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 12.38, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check WEBR's competition here