Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MHK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHK | $107.64 | -1.56% | 6.6B | 16.12 | $6.68 | N/A |
| SN | $133.80 | -1.32% | 18.9B | 26.97 | $4.96 | N/A |
| MAS | $74.03 | +0.38% | 14.9B | 18.33 | $4.04 | +1.70% |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.97% |
| ALH | $25.42 | -1.63% | 4.4B | 35.80 | $0.71 | N/A |
| PATK | $86.70 | +1.14% | 2.9B | 22.29 | $3.89 | +2.08% |
| WHR | $42.89 | +8.42% | 2.7B | 14.05 | $2.95 | +10.36% |
| TILE | $31.87 | +1.76% | 1.9B | 14.89 | $2.14 | +0.31% |
| LZB | $38.49 | -1.28% | 1.6B | 19.25 | $2.00 | +2.46% |
| LEG | $10.60 | -0.70% | 1.4B | 6.58 | $1.61 | +1.88% |
Stock Comparison
MHK vs SN Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while SN trades at $133.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check SN's competition here
MHK vs MAS Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while MAS trades at $74.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAS's ROE of -5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check MAS's competition here
MHK vs TPX Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check TPX's competition here
MHK vs ALH Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while ALH trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALH's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to ALH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check ALH's competition here
MHK vs PATK Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while PATK trades at $86.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check PATK's competition here
MHK vs WHR Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while WHR trades at $42.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check WHR's competition here
MHK vs TILE Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while TILE trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check TILE's competition here
MHK vs LZB Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while LZB trades at $38.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LZB's competition here
MHK vs LEG Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while LEG trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LEG's competition here
MHK vs MBC Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while MBC trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is -886.00. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check MBC's competition here
MHK vs MLKN Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while MLKN trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 108.27. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check MLKN's competition here
MHK vs AMWD Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while AMWD trades at $48.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check AMWD's competition here
MHK vs ETD Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 548.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while ETD trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check ETD's competition here
MHK vs XMAX Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XMAX has a market cap of 515.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while XMAX trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas XMAX's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XMAX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to XMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check XMAX's competition here
MHK vs XWIN Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XWIN has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while XWIN trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas XWIN's P/E ratio is -58.86. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XWIN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to XWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check XWIN's competition here
MHK vs FLXS Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while FLXS trades at $63.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check FLXS's competition here
MHK vs HBB Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 274.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while HBB trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check HBB's competition here
MHK vs LOVE Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while LOVE trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 65.40. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LOVE's competition here
MHK vs LCUT Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while LCUT trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check LCUT's competition here
MHK vs COOK Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 195.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while COOK trades at $70.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check COOK's competition here
MHK vs HOFT Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 165.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while HOFT trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -18.95. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check HOFT's competition here
MHK vs BSET Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while BSET trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check BSET's competition here
MHK vs KEQU Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while KEQU trades at $36.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check KEQU's competition here
MHK vs VIRC Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 101.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while VIRC trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is -92.57. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIRC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check VIRC's competition here
MHK vs NVFY Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while NVFY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check NVFY's competition here
MHK vs VIOT Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while VIOT trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check VIOT's competition here
MHK vs PRPL Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while PRPL trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRPL's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check PRPL's competition here
MHK vs CRWS Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while CRWS trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check CRWS's competition here
MHK vs NTZ Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while NTZ trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check NTZ's competition here
MHK vs EFOI Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while EFOI trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -20.13. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check EFOI's competition here
MHK vs NCL Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while NCL trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check NCL's competition here
MHK vs ATER Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while ATER trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATER's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check ATER's competition here
MHK vs FGI Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while FGI trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check FGI's competition here
MHK vs SNBR Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while SNBR trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check SNBR's competition here
MHK vs IRBT Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while IRBT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -32.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check IRBT's competition here
MHK vs AUVIP Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check AUVIP's competition here
MHK vs AUVI Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check AUVI's competition here
MHK vs FGIWW Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 77.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check FGIWW's competition here
MHK vs WEBR Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check WEBR's competition here
MHK vs KBAL Comparison June 2026
MHK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHK stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MHK is priced at $107.64, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.12, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, MHK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MHK is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHK.Check KBAL's competition here