Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc.
Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. (USAP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (USAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USAP | $44.99 | +0.00% | 423.6M | 16.48 | $2.73 | N/A |
| NUE | $145.66 | +2.99% | 33.7B | 25.73 | $5.67 | +1.50% |
| MT | $33.33 | -0.79% | 25.6B | 21.44 | $1.57 | +1.44% |
| STLD | $131.22 | +3.46% | 19.4B | 18.99 | $6.89 | +1.47% |
| PKX | $57.83 | -3.73% | 18.4B | 30.33 | $1.98 | +1.75% |
| RS | $307.65 | +2.10% | 16.1B | 22.19 | $13.80 | +1.50% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.36% |
| TX | $31.57 | +0.45% | 6.2B | -17.63 | -$1.80 | +8.54% |
| CMC | $53.07 | +2.23% | 6B | 177.73 | $0.30 | +1.35% |
| GGB | $2.99 | -3.55% | 5.8B | 10.91 | $0.28 | +3.49% |
Stock Comparison
USAP vs NUE Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while NUE trades at $145.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check NUE's competition here
USAP vs MT Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while MT trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check MT's competition here
USAP vs STLD Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while STLD trades at $131.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check STLD's competition here
USAP vs PKX Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while PKX trades at $57.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check PKX's competition here
USAP vs RS Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while RS trades at $307.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check RS's competition here
USAP vs X Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check X's competition here
USAP vs TX Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while TX trades at $31.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas TX's P/E ratio is -17.63. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check TX's competition here
USAP vs CMC Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while CMC trades at $53.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 177.73. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check CMC's competition here
USAP vs GGB Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while GGB trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check GGB's competition here
USAP vs CLF Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while CLF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check CLF's competition here
USAP vs SID Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while SID trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check SID's competition here
USAP vs WS Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while WS trades at $31.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check WS's competition here
USAP vs SIM Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while SIM trades at $27.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check SIM's competition here
USAP vs SCHN Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check SCHN's competition here
USAP vs TMST Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check TMST's competition here
USAP vs RDUS Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check RDUS's competition here
USAP vs MTUS Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 714M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while MTUS trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -34.67. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check MTUS's competition here
USAP vs ASTL Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 653.2M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while ASTL trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check ASTL's competition here
USAP vs MSB Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while MSB trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check MSB's competition here
USAP vs ZEUS Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 371.4M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while ZEUS trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check ZEUS's competition here
USAP vs SYNL Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check SYNL's competition here
USAP vs ACNT Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 136.2M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while ACNT trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -15.43. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check ACNT's competition here
USAP vs LUD Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while LUD trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -281.50. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check LUD's competition here
USAP vs FRD Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 109.8M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while FRD trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check FRD's competition here
USAP vs KBSX Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while KBSX trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -25.57. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check KBSX's competition here
USAP vs HLP Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while HLP trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check HLP's competition here
USAP vs ASTLW Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while ASTLW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check ASTLW's competition here
USAP vs HUDI Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while HUDI trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check HUDI's competition here
USAP vs ZKIN Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while ZKIN trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check ZKIN's competition here
USAP vs INHD Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while INHD trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check INHD's competition here
USAP vs MTL-P Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check MTL-P's competition here
USAP vs MTL Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check MTL's competition here
USAP vs OSN Comparison July 2025
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.6M. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.Check OSN's competition here