Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc.
Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. USAP Peers
See (USAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USAP | $44.99 | N/A | 423.58M | 16.48 | $2.73 | N/A |
| NUE | $115.82 | -0.29% | 26.73B | 20.43 | $5.67 | +1.89% |
| MT | $31.20 | +1.60% | 23.76B | 19.87 | $1.57 | +1.55% |
| STLD | $136.06 | +0.95% | 20.20B | 17.86 | $7.62 | +1.38% |
| RS | $304.62 | +0.20% | 16.02B | 21.63 | $14.08 | +1.48% |
| PKX | $44.73 | +0.87% | 13.53B | 25.27 | $1.77 | +2.38% |
| X | $41.60 | +3.10% | 9.42B | 112.43 | $0.37 | +0.48% |
| GGB | $2.79 | -0.89% | 5.49B | 9.95 | $0.28 | +3.72% |
| CMC | $47.77 | -0.57% | 5.40B | 79.61 | $0.60 | +1.51% |
| SIM | $26.40 | +3.53% | 4.06B | 7.83 | $3.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
USAP vs NUE Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 26.73B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while NUE trades at $115.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs MT Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 23.76B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while MT trades at $31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs STLD Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 20.20B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while STLD trades at $136.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs RS Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.02B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while RS trades at $304.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs PKX Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 13.53B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while PKX trades at $44.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs X Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, X has a market cap of 9.42B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while X trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas X's P/E ratio is 112.43. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs GGB Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while GGB trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs CMC Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 5.40B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while CMC trades at $47.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 79.61. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs SIM Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while SIM trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs CLF Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 3.64B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while CLF trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs SID Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while SID trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs WS Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while WS trades at $27.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs SCHN Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.73M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs TMST Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.35M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs RDUS Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 824.66M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while RDUS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs ASTL Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 603.37M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while ASTL trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs MTUS Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 560.17M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while MTUS trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -27.20. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs TX Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 553.78M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while TX trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas TX's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs ZEUS Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 356.54M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while ZEUS trades at $31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs MSB Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 343.74M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while MSB trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs SYNL Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.85M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs ACNT Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 124.72M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while ACNT trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs FRD Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 115.92M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while FRD trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs HLP Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 110.16M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while HLP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -13.64. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs LUD Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 86.22M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while LUD trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -190.00. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs ASTLW Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 44.07M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while ASTLW trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is more volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs HUDI Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 20.70M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while HUDI trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 145.00. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs ZKIN Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 18.54M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while ZKIN trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs KBSX Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 12.21M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while KBSX trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.
USAP vs INHD Comparison
USAP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USAP stands at 423.58M. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 6.40M. Regarding current trading prices, USAP is priced at $44.99, while INHD trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USAP currently has a P/E ratio of 16.48, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, USAP's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, USAP is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USAP.