Universal Music Group N.V.
Universal Music Group N.V. (UMG.AS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UMG.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMG.AS | €25.38 | -0.31% | 46.5B | 22.46 | €1.13 | +2.03% |
| BOL.PA | €5.07 | -0.78% | 14.1B | 101.30 | €0.05 | +1.58% |
| FLE.AS | €9.45 | +0.53% | 4B | 55.59 | €0.17 | N/A |
| VIV.PA | €3.33 | +0.51% | 3.3B | -18.47 | -€0.18 | +1.19% |
| KIN.BR | €36.40 | +1.68% | 973.6M | 24.43 | €1.49 | +1.49% |
| GAM.PA | €80.00 | -1.23% | 249.2M | -32.52 | -€2.46 | N/A |
| SCP.LS | €0.97 | -3.00% | 195.9M | -3.88 | -€0.25 | N/A |
| AJAX.AS | €9.68 | +1.47% | 177.5M | -18.26 | -€0.53 | N/A |
| DEEZR.PA | €1.24 | +0.00% | 147.4M | -5.90 | -€0.21 | N/A |
| MCP.LS | €1.62 | +0.00% | 136.9M | 14.73 | €0.11 | +7.72% |
Stock Comparison
UMG.AS vs BOL.PA Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, BOL.PA has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while BOL.PA trades at €5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas BOL.PA's P/E ratio is 101.30. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to BOL.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to BOL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check BOL.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs FLE.AS Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, FLE.AS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while FLE.AS trades at €9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas FLE.AS's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to FLE.AS's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to FLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check FLE.AS's competition here
UMG.AS vs VIV.PA Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, VIV.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while VIV.PA trades at €3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas VIV.PA's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to VIV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to VIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check VIV.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs KIN.BR Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, KIN.BR has a market cap of 973.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while KIN.BR trades at €36.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas KIN.BR's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KIN.BR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to KIN.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check KIN.BR's competition here
UMG.AS vs GAM.PA Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, GAM.PA has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while GAM.PA trades at €80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas GAM.PA's P/E ratio is -32.52. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GAM.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to GAM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check GAM.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs SCP.LS Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SCP.LS has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while SCP.LS trades at €0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas SCP.LS's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SCP.LS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to SCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check SCP.LS's competition here
UMG.AS vs AJAX.AS Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, AJAX.AS has a market cap of 177.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while AJAX.AS trades at €9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas AJAX.AS's P/E ratio is -18.26. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AJAX.AS's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to AJAX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check AJAX.AS's competition here
UMG.AS vs DEEZR.PA Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, DEEZR.PA has a market cap of 147.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while DEEZR.PA trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas DEEZR.PA's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to DEEZR.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to DEEZR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check DEEZR.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs MCP.LS Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, MCP.LS has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while MCP.LS trades at €1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas MCP.LS's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MCP.LS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to MCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check MCP.LS's competition here
UMG.AS vs SLBEN.LS Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SLBEN.LS has a market cap of 127.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while SLBEN.LS trades at €5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas SLBEN.LS's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SLBEN.LS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to SLBEN.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check SLBEN.LS's competition here
UMG.AS vs ALECP.PA Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ALECP.PA has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while ALECP.PA trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas ALECP.PA's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ALECP.PA's ROE of -19.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to ALECP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check ALECP.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs TCHCS.PA Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, TCHCS.PA has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while TCHCS.PA trades at €1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas TCHCS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TCHCS.PA's ROE of +3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to TCHCS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check TCHCS.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs FCP.LS Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, FCP.LS has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while FCP.LS trades at €1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas FCP.LS's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to FCP.LS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to FCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check FCP.LS's competition here
UMG.AS vs XIL.PA Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, XIL.PA has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while XIL.PA trades at €3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas XIL.PA's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to XIL.PA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to XIL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check XIL.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs SCB.LS Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, SCB.LS has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while SCB.LS trades at €14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas SCB.LS's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SCB.LS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to SCB.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check SCB.LS's competition here
UMG.AS vs ECP.PA Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, ECP.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while ECP.PA trades at €0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas ECP.PA's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ECP.PA's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to ECP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check ECP.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs TCH.PA Comparison July 2025
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 46.5B. In comparison, TCH.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €25.38, while TCH.PA trades at €2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.46, whereas TCH.PA's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TCH.PA's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to TCH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check TCH.PA's competition here