Unilever PLC

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 369.59B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while PG trades at $157.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, LRLCF has a market cap of 230.95B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while LRLCF trades at $432.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas LRLCF's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LRLCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to LRLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, LRLCY has a market cap of 230.24B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while LRLCY trades at $86.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas LRLCY's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LRLCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to LRLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, UNLYF has a market cap of 152.76B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while UNLYF trades at $61.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas UNLYF's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UNLYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to UNLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 72.78B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while CL trades at $89.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CL's ROE of +10.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 46.93B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KVUE trades at $24.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 45.30. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, RBGPF has a market cap of 44.50B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while RBGPF trades at $65.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas RBGPF's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RBGPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to RBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, RBGLY has a market cap of 44.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while RBGLY trades at $13.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas RBGLY's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RBGLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to RBGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 44.15B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KMB trades at $133.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, HELKF has a market cap of 31.49B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while HELKF trades at $72.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas HELKF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HELKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HELKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, BDRFF has a market cap of 30.91B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while BDRFF trades at $138.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas BDRFF's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BDRFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to BDRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, HENOY has a market cap of 30.79B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while HENOY trades at $19.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas HENOY's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HENOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HENOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, HENKY has a market cap of 30.52B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while HENKY trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas HENKY's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HENKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HENKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, BDRFY has a market cap of 30.36B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while BDRFY trades at $27.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas BDRFY's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BDRFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to BDRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, HENOF has a market cap of 30.25B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while HENOF trades at $77.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas HENOF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HENOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HENOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.55B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while CHD trades at $91.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 21.94B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while EL trades at $60.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -25.20. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KAOOY has a market cap of 20.41B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KAOOY trades at $8.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KAOOY's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KAOOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KAOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KAOCF has a market cap of 20.05B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KAOCF trades at $43.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KAOCF's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KAOCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KAOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, ETTYF has a market cap of 19.29B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while ETTYF trades at $27.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas ETTYF's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ETTYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to ETTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 16.61B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while CLX trades at $134.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, UNICY has a market cap of 15.32B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while UNICY trades at $4.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas UNICY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UNICY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to UNICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, UNCHF has a market cap of 14.71B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while UNCHF trades at $8.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas UNCHF's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UNCHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to UNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 13.07B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SGI trades at $62.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 11.20B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while HIMS trades at $51.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 76.44. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SSDOY has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SSDOY trades at $16.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SSDOY's P/E ratio is -88.13. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SSDOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SSDOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, LCCTF has a market cap of 6.56B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while LCCTF trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas LCCTF's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LCCTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to LCCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SSDOF has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SSDOF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SSDOF's P/E ratio is -78.95. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SSDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to SSDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KCDMF has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KCDMF trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KCDMF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KCDMF's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to KCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, LIOPY has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while LIOPY trades at $19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas LIOPY's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LIOPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to LIOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KCDMY has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KCDMY trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KCDMY's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KCDMY's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KCDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, BICEY has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while BICEY trades at $32.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas BICEY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BICEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BICEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, RPHCF has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while RPHCF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas RPHCF's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RPHCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to RPHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while NTCO trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while COTY trades at $4.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, NTCOY has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while NTCOY trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas NTCOY's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NTCOY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NTCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while IPAR trades at $118.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, UNLRF has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while UNLRF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas UNLRF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UNLRF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to UNLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 3.78B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while ELF trades at $66.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 40.11. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, UNLRY has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while UNLRY trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas UNLRY's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UNLRY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to UNLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, VDAHF has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while VDAHF trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas VDAHF's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VDAHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to VDAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, HEGIY has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while HEGIY trades at $14.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas HEGIY's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HEGIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to HEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, HEGIF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while HEGIF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas HEGIF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HEGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HEGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, VDAHY has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while VDAHY trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas VDAHY's P/E ratio is 108.35. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VDAHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to VDAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KBYPF has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KBYPF trades at $37.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KBYPF's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KBYPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KBYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, BICEF has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while BICEF trades at $64.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas BICEF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BICEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to BICEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KOSCF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KOSCF trades at $45.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KOSCF's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to KOSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, LIOPF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while LIOPF trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas LIOPF's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LIOPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to LIOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, FACYF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while FACYF trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas FACYF's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FACYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to FACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KSRYY has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KSRYY trades at $8.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KSRYY's P/E ratio is 44.67. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KSRYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KSRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, PORBF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while PORBF trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas PORBF's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PORBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PORBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while NWL trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, MIOFF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while MIOFF trades at $52.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas MIOFF's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MIOFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to MIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SPB trades at $61.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, BLUMY has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while BLUMY trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas BLUMY's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BLUMY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BLUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, ONXYY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while ONXYY trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas ONXYY's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONXYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to ONXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, PGENY has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while PGENY trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas PGENY's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PGENY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to PGENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, PIGEF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while PIGEF trades at $11.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas PIGEF's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PIGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PIGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, OLVI has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while OLVI trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas OLVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OLVI's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to OLVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while EPC trades at $27.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SRTSF has a market cap of 890.67M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SRTSF trades at $13.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SRTSF's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SRTSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to SRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, DUNIY has a market cap of 691.83M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while DUNIY trades at $29.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas DUNIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DUNIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to DUNIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, ONXXF has a market cap of 671.40M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while ONXXF trades at $8.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas ONXXF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONXXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ONXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 625.88M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while HELE trades at $27.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HELE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, MDOMF has a market cap of 530.36M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while MDOMF trades at $11.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas MDOMF's P/E ratio is 130.56. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MDOMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to MDOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, WPNTF has a market cap of 500.88M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while WPNTF trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas WPNTF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WPNTF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to WPNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, YAMNF has a market cap of 464.93M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while YAMNF trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas YAMNF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to YAMNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to YAMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, PZCUY has a market cap of 445.99M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while PZCUY trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas PZCUY's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PZCUY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PZCUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 393.37M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while PHH trades at $14.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 745.75. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 338.45M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while NUS trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, MCBRF has a market cap of 220.25M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while MCBRF trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas MCBRF's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MCBRF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to MCBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 197.46M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while EWCZ trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, UNHLF has a market cap of 196.39M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while UNHLF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas UNHLF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UNHLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to UNHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 141.38M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while ACU trades at $37.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KITAF has a market cap of 130.66M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KITAF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KITAF's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KITAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to KITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, NBBTF has a market cap of 116.12M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while NBBTF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas NBBTF's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NBBTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to NBBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 107.70M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SKIN trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, RVIV has a market cap of 79.03M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while RVIV trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas RVIV's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RVIV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to RVIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KPTSF has a market cap of 60.64M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KPTSF trades at $6.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KPTSF's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KPTSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to KPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 47.50M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while GROV trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 36.98M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while UG trades at $8.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, PRFUF has a market cap of 26.66M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while PRFUF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas PRFUF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PRFUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to PRFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 21.01M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while MTEX trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MTEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 20.08M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while RAY trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, DQWS has a market cap of 17.75M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while DQWS trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas DQWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DQWS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to DQWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SNBH has a market cap of 9.75M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SNBH trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SNBH's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SNBH's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SNBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.68M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while BRSH trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 7.20M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while DSY trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 144.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, PURE has a market cap of 6.90M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while PURE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas PURE's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PURE's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, MIMNF has a market cap of 6.81M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while MIMNF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas MIMNF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MIMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to MIMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, CAWW has a market cap of 5.95M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while CAWW trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas CAWW's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, ZOONF has a market cap of 5.33M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while ZOONF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas ZOONF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZOONF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ZOONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, MAVBF has a market cap of 4.81M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while MAVBF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas MAVBF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MAVBF's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to MAVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, FDOGF has a market cap of 4.20M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while FDOGF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas FDOGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FDOGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to FDOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, REVRQ has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while REVRQ trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas REVRQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to REVRQ's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to REVRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SPCO has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SPCO trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SPCO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SPCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to SPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SKVI has a market cap of 2.84M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SKVI trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SKVI's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SKVI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SKVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.52M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while TANH trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, NUVI has a market cap of 2.15M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while NUVI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas NUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NUVI's ROE of +9.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NUVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, ZRVT has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while ZRVT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas ZRVT's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZRVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ZRVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.60M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while TKLF trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, CLGOF has a market cap of 1.25M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while CLGOF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas CLGOF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLGOF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to CLGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SLGD has a market cap of 812885.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SLGD trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SLGD's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLGD's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SLGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, PYCT has a market cap of 553705.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while PYCT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas PYCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PYCT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PYCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, PHLI has a market cap of 438307.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while PHLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas PHLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PHLI's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PHLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, WNBD has a market cap of 349998.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while WNBD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas WNBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WNBD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to WNBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, NASO has a market cap of 340384.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while NASO trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas NASO's P/E ratio is -39.55. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NASO's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to NASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, HRSR has a market cap of 185621.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while HRSR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas HRSR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HRSR's ROE of +65.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, TVOG has a market cap of 105898.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while TVOG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas TVOG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TVOG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to TVOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, EESO has a market cap of 72920.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while EESO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas EESO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EESO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EESO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, EOSS has a market cap of 60478.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while EOSS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas EOSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EOSS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, BRSHF has a market cap of 46880.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while BRSHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas BRSHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRSHF's ROE of +14.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to BRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, QNTA has a market cap of 40659.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while QNTA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas QNTA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QNTA's ROE of +2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to QNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SYHO has a market cap of 39592.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SYHO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SYHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SYHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to SYHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, GRBG has a market cap of 38971.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while GRBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas GRBG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to GRBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, JOEY has a market cap of 28244.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while JOEY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas JOEY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JOEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to JOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SNST has a market cap of 26592.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SNST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SNST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SNST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to SNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, INBI has a market cap of 18146.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while INBI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas INBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INBI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to INBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, HPTN has a market cap of 17808.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while HPTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas HPTN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HPTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to HPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, GYSN has a market cap of 13983.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while GYSN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas GYSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GYSN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to GYSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, KPOC has a market cap of 13743.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while KPOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas KPOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KPOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to KPOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, NUUU has a market cap of 11776.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while NUUU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas NUUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NUUU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, EMPO has a market cap of 6279.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while EMPO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas EMPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EMPO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to EMPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6147.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, BEUT has a market cap of 3192.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while BEUT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas BEUT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BEUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to BEUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, NCDP has a market cap of 1848.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while NCDP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas NCDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NCDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to NCDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, MDAV has a market cap of 1424.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while MDAV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas MDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to MDAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, PCGR has a market cap of 785.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while PCGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas PCGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PCGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to PCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, RBCL has a market cap of 221.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while RBCL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas RBCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RBCL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to RBCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SOYO has a market cap of 62.00. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SOYO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SOYO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SOYO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to SOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, BMXC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while BMXC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas BMXC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BMXC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BMXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SLSN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SLSN trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLSN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UL has daily volatility of 0.66 and SLSN has daily volatility of N/A.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, SUMR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while SUMR trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, BWXXF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while BWXXF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas BWXXF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BWXXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to BWXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.

UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 156.41B. In comparison, REV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $62.54, while REV trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.15, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.