Unilever PLC
Unilever PLC UL Peers
See (UL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UL | $59.66 | -0.07% | 146.6B | 22.11 | $2.70 | +4.02% |
| PG | $155.03 | -0.05% | 363.5B | 24.61 | $6.30 | +3.30% |
| CL | $86.64 | -0.23% | 70.2B | 24.55 | $3.53 | +2.92% |
| KVUE | $22.13 | +0.59% | 42.5B | 39.53 | $0.56 | +3.71% |
| KMB | $126.71 | -0.64% | 42B | 17.24 | $7.35 | +3.91% |
| EL | $86.04 | -1.34% | 31B | -35.57 | -$2.42 | +1.98% |
| CHD | $96.49 | -0.11% | 23.8B | 41.42 | $2.33 | +1.20% |
| CLX | $126.57 | -1.40% | 15.6B | 22.73 | $5.57 | +4.79% |
| SGI | $73.84 | +0.71% | 15.4B | 47.33 | $1.56 | +0.41% |
| HIMS | $47.60 | -5.52% | 10.3B | 70.09 | $0.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UL vs PG Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 363.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while PG trades at $155.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs CL Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while CL trades at $86.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CL's ROE of +10.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs KVUE Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while KVUE trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs KMB Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while KMB trades at $126.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs EL Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while EL trades at $86.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -35.57. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs CHD Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while CHD trades at $96.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs CLX Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while CLX trades at $126.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs SGI Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while SGI trades at $73.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 47.33. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs HIMS Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while HIMS trades at $47.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 70.09. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs ELF Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while ELF trades at $111.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 58.14. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs NTCO Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs COTY Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while COTY trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs IPAR Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while IPAR trades at $129.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs NWL Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while NWL trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs SPB Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while SPB trades at $55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs EPC Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while EPC trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs HELE Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 497.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while HELE trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs NUS Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 422.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while NUS trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs SLSN Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 294.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while SLSN trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs EWCZ Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 212.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while EWCZ trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs SKIN Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 209.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while SKIN trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs ACU Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while ACU trades at $42.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs DSY Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while DSY trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 44.33. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs GROV Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while GROV trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs RAY Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while RAY trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs UG Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while UG trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs PHH Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while PHH trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs MTEX Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while MTEX trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -76.09. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs BRSH Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs TANH Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while TANH trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs TKLF Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while TKLF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is -28.14. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs BRSHW Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs REV Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs SUMR Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 146.6B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $59.66, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.11, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.