Ternium S.A.

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while MT trades at $65.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check MT's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while NUE trades at $175.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check NUE's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while STLD trades at $190.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check STLD's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while PKX trades at $69.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 49.38. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check PKX's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while RS trades at $317.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check RS's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while X trades at $54.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to X's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check X's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while GGB trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check GGB's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while CMC trades at $74.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check CMC's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while CLF trades at $10.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check CLF's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while SIM trades at $32.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check SIM's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while SID trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check SID's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while WS trades at $43.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check WS's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while SCHN trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check SCHN's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while TMST trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TX and TMST have similar daily volatility (2.57).Check TMST's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while RDUS trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check RDUS's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 701.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while MTUS trades at $16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -93.56. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check MTUS's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check ZEUS's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while ASTL trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check ASTL's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while USAP trades at $44.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check USAP's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 416.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while MSB trades at $31.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check MSB's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 161.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while ACNT trades at $17.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -53.94. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check ACNT's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while SYNL trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check SYNL's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 143.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while LUD trades at $6.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check LUD's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while FRD trades at $18.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check FRD's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while HLP trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check HLP's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while KBSX trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check KBSX's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while ASTLW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check ASTLW's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while HUDI trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check HUDI's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while ZKIN trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check ZKIN's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 355.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while INHD trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check INHD's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -85.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check MTL-P's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while MTL trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check MTL's competition here

TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 8.4B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $42.91, while OSN trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.78, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.Check OSN's competition here