Ternium S.A.
Ternium S.A. TX Peers
See (TX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TX | $30.10 | -2.11% | 5.9B | -16.72 | -$1.80 | +8.84% |
| NUE | $129.54 | -1.44% | 29.9B | 22.89 | $5.66 | +1.68% |
| MT | $31.58 | +1.02% | 24B | 20.11 | $1.57 | +1.53% |
| STLD | $128.01 | -2.44% | 19B | 16.82 | $7.61 | +1.49% |
| RS | $313.90 | -0.92% | 16.5B | 22.33 | $14.06 | +1.46% |
| PKX | $48.49 | +1.70% | 14.7B | 24.12 | $2.01 | +2.17% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.36% |
| GGB | $2.92 | +1.74% | 5.7B | 10.41 | $0.28 | +3.62% |
| CMC | $48.91 | -2.22% | 5.5B | 162.97 | $0.30 | +1.46% |
| CLF | $7.60 | +2.43% | 3.8B | -3.13 | -$2.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TX vs NUE Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while NUE trades at $129.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs MT Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while MT trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs STLD Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while STLD trades at $128.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs RS Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while RS trades at $313.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs PKX Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while PKX trades at $48.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs X Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs GGB Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while GGB trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs CMC Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while CMC trades at $48.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 162.97. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs CLF Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while CLF trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs SID Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while SID trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs WS Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while WS trades at $29.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs SIM Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while SIM trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs SCHN Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs TMST Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs RDUS Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 831.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while RDUS trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs ASTL Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 723M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while ASTL trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs MTUS Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 647.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while MTUS trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -31.43. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs USAP Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs ZEUS Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 363.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while ZEUS trades at $32.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs MSB Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 314.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while MSB trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs SYNL Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs ACNT Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while ACNT trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -15.01. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs FRD Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 116.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while FRD trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs LUD Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while LUD trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -252.50. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs KBSX Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while KBSX trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -25.29. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs HLP Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while HLP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -7.09. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs ASTLW Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while ASTLW trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs HUDI Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while HUDI trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 132.00. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs ZKIN Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while ZKIN trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs INHD Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while INHD trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs OSN Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs MTL Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.
TX vs MTL-P Comparison
TX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TX stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TX is priced at $30.10, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TX currently has a P/E ratio of -16.72, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TX's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TX is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TX.