Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TUSK's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TUSK and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | $3.18 | +9.28% | 153.5M | -7.42 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| MMM | $174.34 | -1.70% | 89.9B | 20.95 | $8.32 | +1.76% |
| HONIV | $256.01 | +0.00% | 81.1B | 24.88 | $10.29 | +44.60% |
| VMI | $422.10 | -2.46% | 8.1B | 20.80 | $20.29 | +0.71% |
| BBUC | $28.60 | -0.28% | 5.9B | -4.14 | -$6.91 | +0.88% |
| GHC | $1,168.51 | -0.14% | 4.9B | 20.46 | $56.65 | +0.64% |
| OTTR | $90.35 | -0.08% | 3.8B | 13.96 | $6.48 | +2.49% |
| SEB | $3,889.25 | +0.33% | 3.7B | 32.74 | $119.19 | +0.23% |
| BBU | $31.46 | -2.09% | 2.8B | -104.87 | -$0.30 | +0.40% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.3B | 8.58 | $19.82 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
3M Company (NYSE: MMM)
TUSK vs MMM Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 89.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while MMM trades at $174.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMM's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to MMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check MMM's competition here
Honeywell International Inc. Common Stock Ex Distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: HONIV)
TUSK vs HONIV Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, HONIV has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while HONIV trades at $256.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas HONIV's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HONIV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to HONIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check HONIV's competition here
Valmont Industries, Inc. (NYSE: VMI)
TUSK vs VMI Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while VMI trades at $422.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to VMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check VMI's competition here
Brookfield Business Corporation (NYSE: BBUC)
TUSK vs BBUC Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, BBUC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while BBUC trades at $28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas BBUC's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BBUC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to BBUC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check BBUC's competition here
Graham Holdings Company (NYSE: GHC)
TUSK vs GHC Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while GHC trades at $1,168.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check GHC's competition here
Otter Tail Corporation (NASDAQ: OTTR)
TUSK vs OTTR Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, OTTR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while OTTR trades at $90.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas OTTR's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OTTR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to OTTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check OTTR's competition here
Seaboard Corporation (AMEX: SEB)
TUSK vs SEB Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while SEB trades at $3,889.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to SEB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check SEB's competition here
Brookfield Business Partners L.P. (NYSE: BBU)
TUSK vs BBU Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while BBU trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -104.87. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BBU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to BBU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check BBU's competition here
Veritiv Corporation (NYSE: VRTV)
TUSK vs VRTV Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check VRTV's competition here
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Warrants (NASDAQ: FBYDW)
TUSK vs FBYDW Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 894.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while FBYDW trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FBYDW's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI)
TUSK vs CODI Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 838.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while CODI trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CODI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CODI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CODI's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI-PC)
TUSK vs CODI-PC Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 769.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while CODI-PC trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is -22.49. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CODI-PC's competition here
Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (NASDAQ: CRESY)
TUSK vs CRESY Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 762M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while CRESY trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRESY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CRESY's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI-PB)
TUSK vs CODI-PB Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 653.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while CODI-PB trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is -228.56. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CODI-PB's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI-PA)
TUSK vs CODI-PA Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 604.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while CODI-PA trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is -192.15. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CODI-PA's competition here
Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ: MATW)
TUSK vs MATW Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 601.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while MATW trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to MATW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check MATW's competition here
Tejon Ranch Co. (NYSE: TRC)
TUSK vs TRC Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 442.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while TRC trades at $16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 71.26. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check TRC's competition here
Steel Partners Holdings L.P. (NYSE: SPLP-PA)
TUSK vs SPLP-PA Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check SPLP-PA's competition here
NN, Inc. (NASDAQ: NNBR)
TUSK vs NNBR Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 367.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while NNBR trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -16.35. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check NNBR's competition here
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FBYD)
TUSK vs FBYD Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 339.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while FBYD trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is -692.00. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FBYD's competition here
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (NASDAQ: FIP)
TUSK vs FIP Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 339.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while FIP trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to FIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FIP's competition here
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (NASDAQ: FIPWV)
TUSK vs FIPWV Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FIPWV's competition here
RCM Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCMT)
TUSK vs RCMT Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while RCMT trades at $35.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check RCMT's competition here
AIAI Holdings Corporation Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: AIAI)
TUSK vs AIAI Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, AIAI has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while AIAI trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas AIAI's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to AIAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check AIAI's competition here
Air T, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIRT)
TUSK vs AIRT Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while AIRT trades at $27.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check AIRT's competition here
Air T, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIRTP)
TUSK vs AIRTP Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 71.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while AIRTP trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check AIRTP's competition here
Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: STRRP)
TUSK vs STRRP Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, STRRP has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while STRRP trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas STRRP's P/E ratio is -16.65. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRRP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to STRRP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check STRRP's competition here
Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: STRR)
TUSK vs STRR Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, STRR has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while STRR trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas STRR's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to STRR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check STRR's competition here
Hyperscale Data, Inc. (AMEX: GPUS)
TUSK vs GPUS Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, GPUS has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while GPUS trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas GPUS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPUS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to GPUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check GPUS's competition here
Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (NASDAQ: CRESW)
TUSK vs CRESW Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while CRESW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRESW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CRESW's competition here
Planet Green Holdings Corp. (AMEX: PLAG)
TUSK vs PLAG Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while PLAG trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLAG's ROE of +14.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check PLAG's competition here
1847 Holdings LLC (AMEX: EFSH)
TUSK vs EFSH Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check EFSH's competition here
Draper Oakwood Technology Acquisition, Inc. Units (NASDAQ: DOTAU)
TUSK vs DOTAU Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check DOTAU's competition here
FinTech Acquisition Corp. II Units (NASDAQ: FNTEU)
TUSK vs FNTEU Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FNTEU's competition here
Stellar Acquisition III Inc. Units (NASDAQ: STLRU)
TUSK vs STLRU Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check STLRU's competition here
Electrum Special Acquisition Corporation Unit (NASDAQ: ELECU)
TUSK vs ELECU Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check ELECU's competition here
Ocean Bio-Chem, Inc. (NASDAQ: OBCI)
TUSK vs OBCI Comparison October 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 153.5M. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $3.18 on the NASDAQ, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -7.42, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check OBCI's competition here