Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TUSK's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TUSK and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | $2.85 | +0.00% | 137.3M | -2.48 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| MMM | $182.08 | +0.35% | 93.9B | 21.88 | $8.32 | +1.65% |
| HONIV | $256.01 | +0.00% | 81.1B | 24.88 | $10.29 | +45.04% |
| HON | $248.12 | -0.27% | 78.6B | 16.02 | $15.49 | +3.78% |
| VMI | $496.40 | -1.41% | 9.6B | 24.46 | $20.29 | +0.58% |
| SEB | $4,303.67 | -2.02% | 4.1B | 19.23 | $222.81 | +0.21% |
| OTTR | $92.90 | +0.09% | 3.9B | 14.34 | $6.48 | +2.39% |
| BBU | $31.46 | -2.09% | 2.8B | -104.87 | -$0.30 | +0.79% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.3B | 8.58 | $19.82 | +1.48% |
| BBUC | $30.65 | -1.29% | 2.1B | 4.22 | $7.27 | +0.82% |
Stock Comparison
3M Company (NYSE: MMM)
TUSK vs MMM Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while MMM trades at $182.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MMM's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to MMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check MMM's competition here
Honeywell International Inc. Common Stock Ex Distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: HONIV)
TUSK vs HONIV Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, HONIV has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while HONIV trades at $256.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas HONIV's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HONIV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to HONIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check HONIV's competition here
Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ: HON)
TUSK vs HON Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 78.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while HON trades at $248.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check HON's competition here
Valmont Industries, Inc. (NYSE: VMI)
TUSK vs VMI Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while VMI trades at $496.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to VMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check VMI's competition here
Seaboard Corporation (AMEX: SEB)
TUSK vs SEB Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while SEB trades at $4,303.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to SEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check SEB's competition here
Otter Tail Corporation (NASDAQ: OTTR)
TUSK vs OTTR Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, OTTR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while OTTR trades at $92.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas OTTR's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OTTR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to OTTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check OTTR's competition here
Brookfield Business Partners L.P. (NYSE: BBU)
TUSK vs BBU Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while BBU trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -104.87. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BBU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to BBU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check BBU's competition here
Veritiv Corporation (NYSE: VRTV)
TUSK vs VRTV Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check VRTV's competition here
Brookfield Business Corporation (NYSE: BBUC)
TUSK vs BBUC Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, BBUC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while BBUC trades at $30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas BBUC's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BBUC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to BBUC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check BBUC's competition here
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Warrants (NASDAQ: FBYDW)
TUSK vs FBYDW Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while FBYDW trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FBYDW's competition here
Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ: MATW)
TUSK vs MATW Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 857.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while MATW trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MATW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to MATW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check MATW's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI)
TUSK vs CODI Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 817.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while CODI trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CODI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to CODI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CODI's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI-PC)
TUSK vs CODI-PC Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 754.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while CODI-PC trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CODI-PC's competition here
Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (NASDAQ: CRESY)
TUSK vs CRESY Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 717.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while CRESY trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CRESY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CRESY's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI-PA)
TUSK vs CODI-PA Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 637.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while CODI-PA trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is -202.57. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CODI-PA's competition here
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FBYD)
TUSK vs FBYD Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 470.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while FBYD trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is -960.00. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FBYD's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FBYD's competition here
Tejon Ranch Co. (NYSE: TRC)
TUSK vs TRC Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while TRC trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 234.71. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TRC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check TRC's competition here
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (NASDAQ: FIP)
TUSK vs FIP Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 402.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while FIP trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FIP's competition here
Steel Partners Holdings L.P. (NYSE: SPLP-PA)
TUSK vs SPLP-PA Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check SPLP-PA's competition here
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (NASDAQ: FIPWV)
TUSK vs FIPWV Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FIPWV's competition here
AIAI Holdings Corporation Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: AIAI)
TUSK vs AIAI Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, AIAI has a market cap of 293.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while AIAI trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas AIAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AIAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to AIAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check AIAI's competition here
RCM Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCMT)
TUSK vs RCMT Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while RCMT trades at $29.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check RCMT's competition here
NN, Inc. (NASDAQ: NNBR)
TUSK vs NNBR Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while NNBR trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check NNBR's competition here
Air T, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIRTP)
TUSK vs AIRTP Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while AIRTP trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check AIRTP's competition here
Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: STRR)
TUSK vs STRR Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, STRR has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while STRR trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas STRR's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to STRR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to STRR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check STRR's competition here
Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (NASDAQ: CRESW)
TUSK vs CRESW Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while CRESW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CRESW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CRESW's competition here
Tennessee Valley Authority (NYSE: TVC)
TUSK vs TVC Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, TVC has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while TVC trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas TVC's P/E ratio is 10100.84. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TVC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to TVC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check TVC's competition here
Tennessee Valley Authority PARRS A 2029 (NYSE: TVE)
TUSK vs TVE Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, TVE has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while TVE trades at $23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas TVE's P/E ratio is -53007367614150688.00. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to TVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check TVE's competition here
Planet Green Holdings Corp. (AMEX: PLAG)
TUSK vs PLAG Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while PLAG trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -18.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check PLAG's competition here
1847 Holdings LLC (AMEX: EFSH)
TUSK vs EFSH Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to EFSH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check EFSH's competition here
Draper Oakwood Technology Acquisition, Inc. Units (NASDAQ: DOTAU)
TUSK vs DOTAU Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check DOTAU's competition here
Stellar Acquisition III Inc. Units (NASDAQ: STLRU)
TUSK vs STLRU Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check STLRU's competition here
Ocean Bio-Chem, Inc. (NASDAQ: OBCI)
TUSK vs OBCI Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check OBCI's competition here
Electrum Special Acquisition Corporation Unit (NASDAQ: ELECU)
TUSK vs ELECU Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check ELECU's competition here
FinTech Acquisition Corp. II Units (NASDAQ: FNTEU)
TUSK vs FNTEU Comparison August 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 137.3M. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -2.48, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FNTEU's competition here