3M Company (MMM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MMM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMM | $160.44 | +0.30% | 83.7B | 19.28 | $8.32 | +1.88% |
| HONIV | $256.01 | +0.00% | 162.2B | 48.21 | $5.31 | +45.06% |
| HON | $229.86 | +3.66% | 72.8B | 14.96 | $15.37 | +3.10% |
| VMI | $555.35 | -0.66% | 10.8B | 27.37 | $20.29 | +0.52% |
| IEP | $7.24 | +0.84% | 4.9B | -13.97 | -$0.52 | +27.62% |
| MDU | $20.71 | +0.00% | 4.3B | 22.51 | $0.92 | +2.70% |
| GFF | $92.86 | +0.53% | 4.3B | 16.76 | $5.54 | +0.90% |
| SEB | $4,337.15 | -0.06% | 4.2B | 19.47 | $222.81 | +0.21% |
| BBU | $31.46 | -2.09% | 2.8B | -104.87 | -$0.30 | +0.79% |
| FBYDW | $2.57 | -0.39% | 2.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MMM vs HONIV Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, HONIV has a market cap of 162.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while HONIV trades at $256.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas HONIV's P/E ratio is 48.21. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HONIV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to HONIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check HONIV's competition here
MMM vs HON Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while HON trades at $229.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check HON's competition here
MMM vs VMI Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while VMI trades at $555.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check VMI's competition here
MMM vs IEP Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while IEP trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -13.97. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check IEP's competition here
MMM vs MDU Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while MDU trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check MDU's competition here
MMM vs GFF Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while GFF trades at $92.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GFF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check GFF's competition here
MMM vs SEB Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while SEB trades at $4,337.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check SEB's competition here
MMM vs BBU Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while BBU trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -104.87. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BBU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check BBU's competition here
MMM vs FBYDW Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while FBYDW trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check FBYDW's competition here
MMM vs VRTV Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check VRTV's competition here
MMM vs IRS Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while IRS trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IRS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check IRS's competition here
MMM vs AIAI Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, AIAI has a market cap of 994.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while AIAI trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas AIAI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AIAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to AIAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check AIAI's competition here
MMM vs CODI-PC Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 873.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while CODI-PC trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check CODI-PC's competition here
MMM vs MATW Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 832.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while MATW trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MATW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check MATW's competition here
MMM vs CODI Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 798.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while CODI trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CODI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check CODI's competition here
MMM vs FBYD Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 753.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while FBYD trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is -1923.00. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FBYD's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check FBYD's competition here
MMM vs CRESY Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 714.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while CRESY trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CRESY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check CRESY's competition here
MMM vs CODI-PB Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 653.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while CODI-PB trades at $22.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is -228.45. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check CODI-PB's competition here
MMM vs CODI-PA Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 642.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while CODI-PA trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is -204.31. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check CODI-PA's competition here
MMM vs FIP Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while FIP trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check FIP's competition here
MMM vs TRC Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while TRC trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 269.43. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TRC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check TRC's competition here
MMM vs SPLP-PA Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check SPLP-PA's competition here
MMM vs FIPWV Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check FIPWV's competition here
MMM vs RCMT Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while RCMT trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check RCMT's competition here
MMM vs NNBR Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 184.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while NNBR trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check NNBR's competition here
MMM vs TUSK Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 150.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while TUSK trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check TUSK's competition here
MMM vs CRESW Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while CRESW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CRESW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check CRESW's competition here
MMM vs TVC Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, TVC has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while TVC trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas TVC's P/E ratio is 10092.44. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TVC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to TVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check TVC's competition here
MMM vs TVE Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, TVE has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while TVE trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas TVE's P/E ratio is -53074921608561248.00. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TVE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to TVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check TVE's competition here
MMM vs EFSH Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EFSH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check EFSH's competition here
MMM vs DOTAU Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check DOTAU's competition here
MMM vs ELECU Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check ELECU's competition here
MMM vs OBCI Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check OBCI's competition here
MMM vs JBK Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, JBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while JBK trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check JBK's competition here
MMM vs STLRU Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check STLRU's competition here
MMM vs FNTEU Comparison July 2026
MMM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMM stands at 83.7B. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMM is priced at $160.44, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMM currently has a P/E ratio of 19.28, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMM's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMM is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMM.Check FNTEU's competition here