Matthews International Corporation
Matthews International Corporation (MATW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MATW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATW | $27.32 | -1.69% | 850.4M | 91.07 | $0.30 | +3.67% |
| HON | $217.72 | -0.11% | 138B | 34.84 | $6.25 | +2.09% |
| HONIV | $200.99 | -0.50% | 127.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MMM | $145.12 | -1.35% | 75.7B | 27.96 | $5.19 | +2.04% |
| VMI | $515.58 | +0.38% | 10B | 28.68 | $17.98 | +0.54% |
| IEP | $8.11 | +1.25% | 5.5B | -18.43 | -$0.44 | +24.77% |
| MDU | $22.57 | -0.22% | 4.7B | 24.52 | $0.92 | +2.45% |
| SEB | $4,712.28 | -0.82% | 4.5B | 7.78 | $605.70 | +0.19% |
| GFF | $85.91 | +3.67% | 3.9B | 84.23 | $1.02 | +0.93% |
| BBU | $31.46 | -2.09% | 2.8B | -104.87 | -$0.30 | +0.79% |
Stock Comparison
MATW vs HON Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 138B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while HON trades at $217.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 34.84. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check HON's competition here
MATW vs HONIV Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, HONIV has a market cap of 127.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while HONIV trades at $200.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas HONIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HONIV's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to HONIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check HONIV's competition here
MATW vs MMM Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while MMM trades at $145.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMM's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check MMM's competition here
MATW vs VMI Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while VMI trades at $515.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check VMI's competition here
MATW vs IEP Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while IEP trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check IEP's competition here
MATW vs MDU Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while MDU trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check MDU's competition here
MATW vs SEB Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while SEB trades at $4,712.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check SEB's competition here
MATW vs GFF Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while GFF trades at $85.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 84.23. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GFF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check GFF's competition here
MATW vs BBU Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while BBU trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -104.87. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BBU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is less volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check BBU's competition here
MATW vs VRTV Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check VRTV's competition here
MATW vs CODI-PC Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while CODI-PC trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check CODI-PC's competition here
MATW vs FBYDW Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while FBYDW trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check FBYDW's competition here
MATW vs IRS Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while IRS trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IRS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check IRS's competition here
MATW vs SPLP Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 955.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while SPLP trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check SPLP's competition here
MATW vs CODI Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 905.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while CODI trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CODI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is less volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check CODI's competition here
MATW vs CRESY Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 684.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while CRESY trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRESY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check CRESY's competition here
MATW vs CODI-PA Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 673.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while CODI-PA trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check CODI-PA's competition here
MATW vs CODI-PB Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 658.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while CODI-PB trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check CODI-PB's competition here
MATW vs FIP Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 561.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while FIP trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check FIP's competition here
MATW vs TRC Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 520.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while TRC trades at $19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 321.33. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is less volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check TRC's competition here
MATW vs FBYD Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while FBYD trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 377.00. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FBYD's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check FBYD's competition here
MATW vs SPLP-PA Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check SPLP-PA's competition here
MATW vs FIPWV Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check FIPWV's competition here
MATW vs RCMT Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 205.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while RCMT trades at $28.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check RCMT's competition here
MATW vs TUSK Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 157.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while TUSK trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is less volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check TUSK's competition here
MATW vs NNBR Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while NNBR trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check NNBR's competition here
MATW vs CRESW Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while CRESW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRESW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check CRESW's competition here
MATW vs EFSH Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EFSH's ROE of -9.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check EFSH's competition here
MATW vs DOTAU Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check DOTAU's competition here
MATW vs STLRU Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check STLRU's competition here
MATW vs ELECU Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check ELECU's competition here
MATW vs JBK Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, JBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while JBK trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check JBK's competition here
MATW vs FNTEU Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check FNTEU's competition here
MATW vs OBCI Comparison May 2026
MATW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATW stands at 850.4M. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MATW is priced at $27.32, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATW currently has a P/E ratio of 91.07, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, MATW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MATW is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATW.Check OBCI's competition here