Tejon Ranch Co.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TRC
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TRC
Tejon Ranch Co. (TRC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRC | $19.83 | +1.33% | 534M | 180.27 | $0.11 | N/A |
| HON | $233.55 | +1.82% | 148.5B | 33.70 | $6.93 | +1.96% |
| HONIV | $200.99 | -0.50% | 127.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MMM | $154.55 | +2.66% | 81.4B | 25.71 | $6.01 | +1.92% |
| VMI | $412.62 | +2.71% | 8.1B | 24.58 | $16.78 | +0.68% |
| SEB | $5,539.29 | -0.33% | 5.3B | 10.85 | $511.31 | +0.16% |
| IEP | $7.74 | -0.90% | 4.9B | -14.88 | -$0.52 | +25.84% |
| MDU | $21.76 | -0.84% | 4.4B | 23.40 | $0.93 | +2.53% |
| GFF | $87.81 | +4.74% | 4.1B | 86.97 | $1.01 | +0.92% |
| BBU | $31.46 | -2.09% | 2.8B | -104.87 | -$0.30 | +0.79% |
Stock Comparison
TRC vs HON Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 148.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while HON trades at $233.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check HON's competition here
TRC vs HONIV Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, HONIV has a market cap of 127.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while HONIV trades at $200.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas HONIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HONIV's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to HONIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check HONIV's competition here
TRC vs MMM Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while MMM trades at $154.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check MMM's competition here
TRC vs VMI Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while VMI trades at $412.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check VMI's competition here
TRC vs SEB Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while SEB trades at $5,539.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check SEB's competition here
TRC vs IEP Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while IEP trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check IEP's competition here
TRC vs MDU Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while MDU trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check MDU's competition here
TRC vs GFF Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while GFF trades at $87.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 86.97. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check GFF's competition here
TRC vs BBU Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while BBU trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -104.87. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check BBU's competition here
TRC vs VRTV Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check VRTV's competition here
TRC vs FBYDW Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while FBYDW trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check FBYDW's competition here
TRC vs CODI-PC Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while CODI-PC trades at $20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check CODI-PC's competition here
TRC vs IRS Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while IRS trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IRS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check IRS's competition here
TRC vs SPLP Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 955.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while SPLP trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check SPLP's competition here
TRC vs MATW Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 857.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while MATW trades at $27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is 38.79. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MATW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check MATW's competition here
TRC vs CODI Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 793.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while CODI trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CODI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check CODI's competition here
TRC vs CRESY Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 749.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while CRESY trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRESY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check CRESY's competition here
TRC vs FIP Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 685.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while FIP trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check FIP's competition here
TRC vs CODI-PA Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while CODI-PA trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check CODI-PA's competition here
TRC vs CODI-PB Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 618.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while CODI-PB trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check CODI-PB's competition here
TRC vs FBYD Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while FBYD trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 452.33. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBYD's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check FBYD's competition here
TRC vs SPLP-PA Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check SPLP-PA's competition here
TRC vs FIPWV Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check FIPWV's competition here
TRC vs RCMT Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 235.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while RCMT trades at $31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check RCMT's competition here
TRC vs TUSK Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while TUSK trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check TUSK's competition here
TRC vs NNBR Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 116.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while NNBR trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check NNBR's competition here
TRC vs CRESW Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while CRESW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRESW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check CRESW's competition here
TRC vs EFSH Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFSH's ROE of -9.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check EFSH's competition here
TRC vs DOTAU Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check DOTAU's competition here
TRC vs JBK Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, JBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while JBK trades at $26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check JBK's competition here
TRC vs FNTEU Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check FNTEU's competition here
TRC vs ELECU Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check ELECU's competition here
TRC vs OBCI Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check OBCI's competition here
TRC vs STLRU Comparison April 2026
TRC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRC stands at 534M. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRC is priced at $19.83, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRC currently has a P/E ratio of 180.27, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRC is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRC.Check STLRU's competition here