Trane Technologies plc
Trane Technologies plc TT Peers
See (TT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | $428.84 | -0.46% | 95.6B | 35.27 | $12.16 | +1.02% |
| JCI | $103.76 | +1.41% | 68.3B | 31.35 | $3.31 | +1.43% |
| CARR | $71.03 | -0.52% | 60.9B | 47.35 | $1.50 | +1.17% |
| LII | $552.31 | +0.31% | 19.6B | 24.62 | $22.43 | +0.83% |
| CSL | $378.13 | -0.15% | 16.4B | 21.09 | $17.93 | +1.06% |
| MAS | $63.19 | -0.21% | 13.3B | 17.26 | $3.66 | +1.90% |
| BLDR | $111.56 | -1.59% | 12.3B | 14.30 | $7.80 | N/A |
| OC | $135.27 | -0.19% | 11.5B | 18.89 | $7.16 | +1.90% |
| WMS | $114.85 | -0.08% | 8.9B | 19.94 | $5.76 | +0.57% |
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TT vs JCI Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while JCI trades at $103.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs CARR Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while CARR trades at $71.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 47.35. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs LII Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while LII trades at $552.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LII's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs CSL Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while CSL trades at $378.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs MAS Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while MAS trades at $63.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MAS's ROE of -4.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs BLDR Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while BLDR trades at $111.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs OC Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while OC trades at $135.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas OC's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to OC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs WMS Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while WMS trades at $114.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs FBHS Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs AAON Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while AAON trades at $96.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 50.62. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs BECN Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs AZEK Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while AZEK trades at $52.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs AWI Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while AWI trades at $154.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs SSD Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while SSD trades at $156.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs FBIN Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while FBIN trades at $51.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs TREX Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while TREX trades at $56.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs IBP Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, IBP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while IBP trades at $164.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas IBP's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IBP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to IBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs GMS Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while GMS trades at $78.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs DOOR Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs PGTI Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs ROCK Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while ROCK trades at $59.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs JBI Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while JBI trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs NX Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 892.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while NX trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas NX's P/E ratio is 51.08. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs APOG Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 847M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while APOG trades at $39.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs SWIM Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 683.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while SWIM trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is -45.15. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SWIM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs BXC Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 540.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while BXC trades at $67.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs ASPN Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 495.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while ASPN trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs JELD Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 327.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while JELD trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JELD's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs PPIH Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 116.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while PPIH trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs PHOE Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while PHOE trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 58.83. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs CSTE Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while CSTE trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs APT Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while APT trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs AIRJW Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while AIRJW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs ILAG Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while ILAG trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs AEHL Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while AEHL trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs VIEW Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs VIEWW Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs AFI Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.
TT vs FRTA Comparison
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 95.6B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $428.84, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.