Transcat, Inc.
Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRNS | $71.75 | -2.66% | 672.8M | 84.81 | $0.85 | N/A |
| FAST | $44.49 | -1.31% | 51.1B | 40.45 | $1.10 | +2.01% |
| GWW | $1,043.05 | -0.26% | 49.4B | 29.45 | $35.38 | +0.86% |
| FERG | $217.71 | -1.87% | 42.4B | 21.44 | $10.16 | +1.57% |
| WSO | $383.13 | +1.37% | 15.6B | 31.27 | $12.26 | +3.13% |
| QXO | $20.28 | +0.75% | 14.4B | -32.19 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| WSO-B | $368.33 | +0.00% | 14B | 30.12 | $12.23 | +3.13% |
| WCC | $258.04 | +2.54% | 12.6B | 19.75 | $13.06 | +0.72% |
| WCC-PA | $221.82 | +1.73% | 10.9B | 21.85 | $10.15 | +0.72% |
| AIT | $256.58 | -0.75% | 9.7B | 24.41 | $10.51 | +0.74% |
Stock Comparison
TRNS vs FAST Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, FAST has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while FAST trades at $44.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas FAST's P/E ratio is 40.45. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FAST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to FAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check FAST's competition here
TRNS vs GWW Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, GWW has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while GWW trades at $1,043.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas GWW's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GWW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to GWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check GWW's competition here
TRNS vs FERG Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, FERG has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while FERG trades at $217.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas FERG's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FERG's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to FERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check FERG's competition here
TRNS vs WSO Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, WSO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while WSO trades at $383.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas WSO's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WSO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to WSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WSO's competition here
TRNS vs QXO Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while QXO trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -32.19. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check QXO's competition here
TRNS vs WSO-B Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, WSO-B has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while WSO-B trades at $368.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas WSO-B's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WSO-B's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to WSO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WSO-B's competition here
TRNS vs WCC Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, WCC has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while WCC trades at $258.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas WCC's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WCC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to WCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WCC's competition here
TRNS vs WCC-PA Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, WCC-PA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while WCC-PA trades at $221.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas WCC-PA's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WCC-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to WCC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WCC-PA's competition here
TRNS vs AIT Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, AIT has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while AIT trades at $256.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas AIT's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AIT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to AIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check AIT's competition here
TRNS vs CNM Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, CNM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while CNM trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas CNM's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to CNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check CNM's competition here
TRNS vs POOL Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, POOL has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while POOL trades at $204.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas POOL's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to POOL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to POOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check POOL's competition here
TRNS vs SITE Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, SITE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while SITE trades at $130.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas SITE's P/E ratio is 38.68. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SITE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to SITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check SITE's competition here
TRNS vs MSM Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, MSM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while MSM trades at $86.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas MSM's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to MSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check MSM's competition here
TRNS vs DXPE Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, DXPE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while DXPE trades at $131.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas DXPE's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DXPE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to DXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check DXPE's competition here
TRNS vs SYX Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, SYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while SYX trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas SYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to SYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check SYX's competition here
TRNS vs DSGR Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, DSGR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while DSGR trades at $26.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas DSGR's P/E ratio is 149.61. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to DSGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check DSGR's competition here
TRNS vs GIC Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, GIC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while GIC trades at $30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas GIC's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to GIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check GIC's competition here
TRNS vs LAWS Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, LAWS has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while LAWS trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas LAWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LAWS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to LAWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check LAWS's competition here
TRNS vs TITN Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, TITN has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while TITN trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas TITN's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TITN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to TITN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check TITN's competition here
TRNS vs EVI Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, EVI has a market cap of 264.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while EVI trades at $20.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas EVI's P/E ratio is 44.65. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to EVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check EVI's competition here
TRNS vs BRIA Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while BRIA trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRIA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check BRIA's competition here
TRNS vs HTLM Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while HTLM trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check HTLM's competition here
TRNS vs RECT Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, RECT has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while RECT trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas RECT's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RECT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to RECT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check RECT's competition here
TRNS vs PASW Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, PASW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while PASW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas PASW's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PASW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to PASW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check PASW's competition here
TRNS vs HWCC Comparison March 2026
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 672.8M. In comparison, HWCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $71.75, while HWCC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 84.81, whereas HWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HWCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to HWCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check HWCC's competition here