Transcat, Inc.
Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRNS | $76.43 | -1.27% | 712.2M | 48.68 | $1.57 | N/A |
| FAST | $46.13 | -0.60% | 52.9B | 44.79 | $1.03 | +1.84% |
| GWW | $1,039.54 | -0.30% | 49.9B | 26.66 | $39.00 | +0.81% |
| FERG | $223.33 | -0.95% | 44.1B | 27.93 | $8.00 | +1.45% |
| WSO | $450.88 | +1.86% | 18.3B | 35.59 | $12.70 | +2.59% |
| WSO-B | $434.48 | +0.00% | 17.5B | 33.22 | $13.08 | +2.59% |
| CNM | $63.64 | -1.43% | 12.1B | 29.44 | $2.16 | N/A |
| POOL | $308.14 | -1.31% | 11.6B | 28.45 | $10.83 | +1.56% |
| AIT | $271.50 | -0.77% | 10.3B | 27.24 | $9.97 | +0.61% |
| WCC | $206.96 | -2.73% | 10.1B | 15.69 | $13.19 | +0.82% |
Stock Comparison
TRNS vs FAST Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, FAST has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while FAST trades at $46.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas FAST's P/E ratio is 44.79. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAST's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to FAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check FAST's competition here
TRNS vs GWW Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, GWW has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while GWW trades at $1,039.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas GWW's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GWW's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to GWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check GWW's competition here
TRNS vs FERG Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, FERG has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while FERG trades at $223.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas FERG's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FERG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to FERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check FERG's competition here
TRNS vs WSO Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, WSO has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while WSO trades at $450.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas WSO's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to WSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WSO's competition here
TRNS vs WSO-B Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, WSO-B has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while WSO-B trades at $434.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas WSO-B's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSO-B's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to WSO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WSO-B's competition here
TRNS vs CNM Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, CNM has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while CNM trades at $63.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas CNM's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to CNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check CNM's competition here
TRNS vs POOL Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, POOL has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while POOL trades at $308.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas POOL's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POOL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to POOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check POOL's competition here
TRNS vs AIT Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, AIT has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while AIT trades at $271.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas AIT's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to AIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check AIT's competition here
TRNS vs WCC Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, WCC has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while WCC trades at $206.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas WCC's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WCC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to WCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WCC's competition here
TRNS vs WCC-PA Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, WCC-PA has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while WCC-PA trades at $197.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas WCC-PA's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WCC-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to WCC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check WCC-PA's competition here
TRNS vs SITE Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, SITE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while SITE trades at $137.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas SITE's P/E ratio is 50.30. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to SITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check SITE's competition here
TRNS vs MSM Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, MSM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while MSM trades at $86.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas MSM's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to MSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check MSM's competition here
TRNS vs DXPE Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, DXPE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while DXPE trades at $113.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas DXPE's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DXPE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to DXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check DXPE's competition here
TRNS vs DSGR Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, DSGR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while DSGR trades at $29.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas DSGR's P/E ratio is 1498.50. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DSGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to DSGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check DSGR's competition here
TRNS vs SYX Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, SYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while SYX trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas SYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to SYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check SYX's competition here
TRNS vs GIC Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, GIC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while GIC trades at $34.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas GIC's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GIC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to GIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check GIC's competition here
TRNS vs LAWS Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, LAWS has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while LAWS trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas LAWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LAWS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to LAWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check LAWS's competition here
TRNS vs TITN Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, TITN has a market cap of 446M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while TITN trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas TITN's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TITN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to TITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check TITN's competition here
TRNS vs EVI Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, EVI has a market cap of 284.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while EVI trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas EVI's P/E ratio is 46.44. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to EVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check EVI's competition here
TRNS vs RECT Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, RECT has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while RECT trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas RECT's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RECT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to RECT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check RECT's competition here
TRNS vs BRIA Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while BRIA trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRIA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is less volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check BRIA's competition here
TRNS vs HTLM Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while HTLM trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is -43.11. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HTLM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check HTLM's competition here
TRNS vs HWCC Comparison July 2025
TRNS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNS stands at 712.2M. In comparison, HWCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNS is priced at $76.43, while HWCC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.68, whereas HWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HWCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNS is more volatile compared to HWCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNS.Check HWCC's competition here