Fastenal Company (FAST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FAST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAST | $46.49 | +0.30% | 53.4B | 40.78 | $1.14 | +1.97% |
| GWW | $1,375.76 | +0.80% | 65B | 33.35 | $41.27 | +0.67% |
| FERG | $227.46 | +1.26% | 44.1B | 23.26 | $9.78 | +1.55% |
| WCC | $335.02 | +1.86% | 16.3B | 23.80 | $14.08 | +0.57% |
| WSO | $383.86 | +1.62% | 15.8B | 31.85 | $12.05 | +3.19% |
| WSO-B | $385.00 | +0.00% | 15.7B | 30.41 | $12.66 | +3.19% |
| AIT | $331.15 | +2.69% | 12.2B | 31.27 | $10.59 | +0.59% |
| WCC-PA | $221.82 | +1.73% | 10.9B | 21.85 | $10.15 | +0.57% |
| QXO | $14.99 | +2.81% | 10.9B | 99.84 | $0.15 | N/A |
| CNM | $45.86 | +1.44% | 8.6B | 18.06 | $2.54 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FAST vs GWW Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, GWW has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while GWW trades at $1,375.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas GWW's P/E ratio is 33.35. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is more volatile compared to GWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check GWW's competition here
FAST vs FERG Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, FERG has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while FERG trades at $227.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas FERG's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FERG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is more volatile compared to FERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check FERG's competition here
FAST vs WCC Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, WCC has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while WCC trades at $335.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas WCC's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WCC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to WCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check WCC's competition here
FAST vs WSO Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, WSO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while WSO trades at $383.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas WSO's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WSO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to WSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check WSO's competition here
FAST vs WSO-B Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, WSO-B has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while WSO-B trades at $385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas WSO-B's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WSO-B's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is more volatile compared to WSO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check WSO-B's competition here
FAST vs AIT Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, AIT has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while AIT trades at $331.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas AIT's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AIT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to AIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check AIT's competition here
FAST vs WCC-PA Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, WCC-PA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while WCC-PA trades at $221.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas WCC-PA's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WCC-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to WCC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check WCC-PA's competition here
FAST vs QXO Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while QXO trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is 99.84. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check QXO's competition here
FAST vs CNM Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, CNM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while CNM trades at $45.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas CNM's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CNM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is more volatile compared to CNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check CNM's competition here
FAST vs POOL Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, POOL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while POOL trades at $210.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas POOL's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to POOL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is more volatile compared to POOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check POOL's competition here
FAST vs MSM Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, MSM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while MSM trades at $123.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas MSM's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MSM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to MSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check MSM's competition here
FAST vs SITE Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, SITE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while SITE trades at $106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas SITE's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SITE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to SITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check SITE's competition here
FAST vs DXPE Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, DXPE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while DXPE trades at $162.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas DXPE's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DXPE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to DXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check DXPE's competition here
FAST vs GLP-PB Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while GLP-PB trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check GLP-PB's competition here
FAST vs GLP Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while GLP trades at $48.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is more volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check GLP's competition here
FAST vs SYX Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, SYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while SYX trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas SYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SYX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to SYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check SYX's competition here
FAST vs GIC Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, GIC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while GIC trades at $33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas GIC's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to GIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check GIC's competition here
FAST vs DSGR Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, DSGR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while DSGR trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas DSGR's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DSGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to DSGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check DSGR's competition here
FAST vs TRNS Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, TRNS has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while TRNS trades at $88.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas TRNS's P/E ratio is 58.16. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TRNS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is more volatile compared to TRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check TRNS's competition here
FAST vs LAWS Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, LAWS has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while LAWS trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas LAWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LAWS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to LAWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check LAWS's competition here
FAST vs TITN Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, TITN has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while TITN trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas TITN's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TITN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to TITN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check TITN's competition here
FAST vs EVI Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, EVI has a market cap of 207.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while EVI trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas EVI's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EVI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to EVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check EVI's competition here
FAST vs BRIA Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while BRIA trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BRIA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check BRIA's competition here
FAST vs HTLM Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while HTLM trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check HTLM's competition here
FAST vs RECT Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, RECT has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while RECT trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas RECT's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RECT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to RECT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check RECT's competition here
FAST vs FGI Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while FGI trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check FGI's competition here
FAST vs CGTL Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while CGTL trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CGTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check CGTL's competition here
FAST vs JBDI Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while JBDI trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -26.20. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JBDI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check JBDI's competition here
FAST vs BGLC Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, BGLC has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while BGLC trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas BGLC's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BGLC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to BGLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check BGLC's competition here
FAST vs PASW Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, PASW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while PASW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas PASW's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PASW's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to PASW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check PASW's competition here
FAST vs UGRO Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while UGRO trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to UGRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check UGRO's competition here
FAST vs HWCC Comparison July 2026
FAST plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAST stands at 53.4B. In comparison, HWCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAST is priced at $46.49, while HWCC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAST currently has a P/E ratio of 40.78, whereas HWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAST's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HWCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAST is more volatile compared to HWCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAST.Check HWCC's competition here