W.W. Grainger, Inc.
W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWW | $1,134.78 | -0.64% | 53.7B | 32.07 | $35.38 | +0.79% |
| FAST | $44.33 | -1.23% | 50.9B | 39.23 | $1.13 | +2.07% |
| FERG | $252.81 | -3.06% | 49.1B | 24.88 | $10.15 | +1.36% |
| WSO-B | $453.37 | +0.75% | 17.2B | 37.59 | $12.06 | +2.90% |
| WSO | $420.68 | +1.42% | 17.1B | 35.95 | $11.70 | +2.90% |
| WCC | $350.59 | +1.13% | 17.1B | 24.90 | $14.08 | +0.54% |
| QXO | $18.87 | -1.31% | 13.7B | -29.94 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| AIT | $305.48 | +0.49% | 11.3B | 28.79 | $10.61 | +0.62% |
| WCC-PA | $221.82 | +1.73% | 10.9B | 21.85 | $10.15 | +0.54% |
| CNM | $49.04 | +1.20% | 9.2B | 21.23 | $2.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GWW vs FAST Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, FAST has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while FAST trades at $44.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas FAST's P/E ratio is 39.23. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FAST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to FAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check FAST's competition here
GWW vs FERG Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, FERG has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while FERG trades at $252.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas FERG's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FERG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to FERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check FERG's competition here
GWW vs WSO-B Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, WSO-B has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while WSO-B trades at $453.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas WSO-B's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WSO-B's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to WSO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WSO-B's competition here
GWW vs WSO Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, WSO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while WSO trades at $420.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas WSO's P/E ratio is 35.95. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WSO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to WSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WSO's competition here
GWW vs WCC Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, WCC has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while WCC trades at $350.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas WCC's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WCC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to WCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WCC's competition here
GWW vs QXO Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while QXO trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -29.94. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check QXO's competition here
GWW vs AIT Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, AIT has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while AIT trades at $305.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas AIT's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AIT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to AIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check AIT's competition here
GWW vs WCC-PA Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, WCC-PA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while WCC-PA trades at $221.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas WCC-PA's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WCC-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to WCC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WCC-PA's competition here
GWW vs CNM Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, CNM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while CNM trades at $49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas CNM's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CNM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to CNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check CNM's competition here
GWW vs POOL Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, POOL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while POOL trades at $187.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas POOL's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to POOL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to POOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check POOL's competition here
GWW vs MSM Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, MSM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while MSM trades at $103.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas MSM's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MSM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to MSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check MSM's competition here
GWW vs SITE Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, SITE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while SITE trades at $121.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas SITE's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SITE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to SITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check SITE's competition here
GWW vs DXPE Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, DXPE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while DXPE trades at $179.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas DXPE's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DXPE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to DXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check DXPE's competition here
GWW vs SYX Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, SYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while SYX trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas SYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SYX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to SYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check SYX's competition here
GWW vs DSGR Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, DSGR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while DSGR trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas DSGR's P/E ratio is 234.00. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DSGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to DSGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check DSGR's competition here
GWW vs GIC Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, GIC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while GIC trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas GIC's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to GIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check GIC's competition here
GWW vs LAWS Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, LAWS has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while LAWS trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas LAWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LAWS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to LAWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check LAWS's competition here
GWW vs TRNS Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, TRNS has a market cap of 703M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while TRNS trades at $75.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas TRNS's P/E ratio is 88.62. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TRNS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to TRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check TRNS's competition here
GWW vs TITN Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, TITN has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while TITN trades at $21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas TITN's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TITN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to TITN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check TITN's competition here
GWW vs EVI Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, EVI has a market cap of 255.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while EVI trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas EVI's P/E ratio is 43.24. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EVI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to EVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check EVI's competition here
GWW vs BRIA Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while BRIA trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BRIA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check BRIA's competition here
GWW vs HTLM Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while HTLM trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check HTLM's competition here
GWW vs RECT Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, RECT has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while RECT trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas RECT's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RECT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to RECT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check RECT's competition here
GWW vs PASW Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, PASW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while PASW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas PASW's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PASW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to PASW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check PASW's competition here
GWW vs HWCC Comparison May 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 53.7B. In comparison, HWCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,134.78, while HWCC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 32.07, whereas HWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HWCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to HWCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check HWCC's competition here