W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWW | $1,371.44 | +0.03% | 64.8B | 33.23 | $41.27 | +0.68% |
| FAST | $45.36 | -0.83% | 52.1B | 38.44 | $1.18 | +2.04% |
| FERG | $230.52 | -1.77% | 44.7B | 23.56 | $9.78 | +1.51% |
| WCC | $336.70 | -1.01% | 16.4B | 23.89 | $14.08 | +0.57% |
| WSO | $387.24 | -2.04% | 15.9B | 32.11 | $12.05 | +3.18% |
| WSO-B | $385.00 | +0.00% | 15.7B | 30.41 | $12.66 | +3.18% |
| AIT | $327.65 | +0.05% | 12.1B | 30.94 | $10.59 | +0.59% |
| QXO | $15.32 | +5.95% | 11.1B | 102.10 | $0.15 | N/A |
| WCC-PA | $221.82 | +1.73% | 10.9B | 21.85 | $10.15 | +0.57% |
| CNM | $44.66 | -1.24% | 8.4B | 17.59 | $2.54 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GWW vs FAST Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, FAST has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while FAST trades at $45.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas FAST's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FAST's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to FAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check FAST's competition here
GWW vs FERG Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, FERG has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while FERG trades at $230.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas FERG's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FERG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to FERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check FERG's competition here
GWW vs WCC Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, WCC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while WCC trades at $336.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas WCC's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WCC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to WCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WCC's competition here
GWW vs WSO Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, WSO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while WSO trades at $387.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas WSO's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WSO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to WSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WSO's competition here
GWW vs WSO-B Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, WSO-B has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while WSO-B trades at $385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas WSO-B's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WSO-B's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to WSO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WSO-B's competition here
GWW vs AIT Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, AIT has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while AIT trades at $327.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas AIT's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AIT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to AIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check AIT's competition here
GWW vs QXO Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while QXO trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is 102.10. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check QXO's competition here
GWW vs WCC-PA Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, WCC-PA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while WCC-PA trades at $221.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas WCC-PA's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WCC-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to WCC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WCC-PA's competition here
GWW vs CNM Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, CNM has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while CNM trades at $44.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas CNM's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CNM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to CNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check CNM's competition here
GWW vs POOL Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, POOL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while POOL trades at $202.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas POOL's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to POOL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to POOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check POOL's competition here
GWW vs MSM Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, MSM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while MSM trades at $123.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas MSM's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MSM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to MSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check MSM's competition here
GWW vs SITE Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, SITE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while SITE trades at $104.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas SITE's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SITE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to SITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check SITE's competition here
GWW vs DXPE Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, DXPE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while DXPE trades at $165.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas DXPE's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DXPE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to DXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check DXPE's competition here
GWW vs GLP-PB Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while GLP-PB trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check GLP-PB's competition here
GWW vs GLP Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while GLP trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check GLP's competition here
GWW vs SYX Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, SYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while SYX trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas SYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SYX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to SYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check SYX's competition here
GWW vs GIC Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, GIC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while GIC trades at $33.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas GIC's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to GIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check GIC's competition here
GWW vs DSGR Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, DSGR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while DSGR trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas DSGR's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DSGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to DSGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check DSGR's competition here
GWW vs TRNS Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, TRNS has a market cap of 814.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while TRNS trades at $87.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas TRNS's P/E ratio is 57.39. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TRNS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to TRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check TRNS's competition here
GWW vs LAWS Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, LAWS has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while LAWS trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas LAWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LAWS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to LAWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check LAWS's competition here
GWW vs TITN Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, TITN has a market cap of 443M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while TITN trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas TITN's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TITN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to TITN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check TITN's competition here
GWW vs EVI Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, EVI has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while EVI trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas EVI's P/E ratio is 36.49. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EVI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to EVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check EVI's competition here
GWW vs BRIA Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while BRIA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BRIA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check BRIA's competition here
GWW vs HTLM Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while HTLM trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check HTLM's competition here
GWW vs RECT Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, RECT has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while RECT trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas RECT's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RECT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to RECT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check RECT's competition here
GWW vs FGI Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while FGI trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check FGI's competition here
GWW vs CGTL Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while CGTL trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CGTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check CGTL's competition here
GWW vs JBDI Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while JBDI trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -25.80. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JBDI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check JBDI's competition here
GWW vs BGLC Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, BGLC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while BGLC trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas BGLC's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BGLC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to BGLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check BGLC's competition here
GWW vs PASW Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, PASW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while PASW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas PASW's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PASW's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to PASW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check PASW's competition here
GWW vs UGRO Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while UGRO trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to UGRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check UGRO's competition here
GWW vs HWCC Comparison July 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 64.8B. In comparison, HWCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,371.44, while HWCC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.23, whereas HWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HWCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to HWCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check HWCC's competition here