Ping An Biomedical Co., Ltd.
Ping An Biomedical Co., Ltd. (PASW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PASW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PASW | $0.16 | -0.06% | 2.9M | -1.56 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| GWW | $1,247.79 | +0.69% | 58.9B | 33.54 | $37.21 | +0.74% |
| FAST | $43.94 | +0.94% | 50.4B | 38.88 | $1.13 | +2.11% |
| FERG | $223.31 | -0.19% | 43.3B | 21.98 | $10.16 | +1.95% |
| WCC | $363.57 | +2.63% | 17.7B | 25.86 | $14.06 | +0.52% |
| WSO | $375.17 | -0.84% | 15.2B | 30.78 | $12.18 | +3.28% |
| WSO-B | $390.00 | -3.42% | 14.8B | 31.97 | $12.20 | +3.28% |
| QXO | $16.67 | -2.11% | 12.1B | -17.55 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| AIT | $307.10 | +0.47% | 11.3B | 29.04 | $10.57 | +0.63% |
| WCC-PA | $221.82 | +1.73% | 10.9B | 21.85 | $10.15 | +0.52% |
Stock Comparison
PASW vs GWW Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GWW has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while GWW trades at $1,247.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GWW's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GWW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to GWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check GWW's competition here
PASW vs FAST Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FAST has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while FAST trades at $43.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FAST's P/E ratio is 38.88. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FAST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to FAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check FAST's competition here
PASW vs FERG Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FERG has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while FERG trades at $223.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas FERG's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FERG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to FERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check FERG's competition here
PASW vs WCC Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, WCC has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while WCC trades at $363.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas WCC's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WCC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to WCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check WCC's competition here
PASW vs WSO Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, WSO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while WSO trades at $375.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas WSO's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WSO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to WSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check WSO's competition here
PASW vs WSO-B Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, WSO-B has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while WSO-B trades at $390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas WSO-B's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WSO-B's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to WSO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check WSO-B's competition here
PASW vs QXO Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while QXO trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -17.55. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check QXO's competition here
PASW vs AIT Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, AIT has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while AIT trades at $307.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas AIT's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to AIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check AIT's competition here
PASW vs WCC-PA Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, WCC-PA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while WCC-PA trades at $221.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas WCC-PA's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WCC-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to WCC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check WCC-PA's competition here
PASW vs CNM Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CNM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while CNM trades at $47.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas CNM's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CNM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to CNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check CNM's competition here
PASW vs POOL Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, POOL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while POOL trades at $184.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas POOL's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POOL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to POOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check POOL's competition here
PASW vs MSM Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, MSM has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while MSM trades at $106.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas MSM's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to MSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check MSM's competition here
PASW vs SITE Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SITE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while SITE trades at $113.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas SITE's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SITE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to SITE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check SITE's competition here
PASW vs DXPE Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DXPE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while DXPE trades at $144.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas DXPE's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DXPE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to DXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check DXPE's competition here
PASW vs SYX Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while SYX trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas SYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to SYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check SYX's competition here
PASW vs DSGR Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DSGR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while DSGR trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas DSGR's P/E ratio is 225.00. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to DSGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check DSGR's competition here
PASW vs GIC Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while GIC trades at $29.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas GIC's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to GIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check GIC's competition here
PASW vs LAWS Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LAWS has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while LAWS trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas LAWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LAWS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to LAWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check LAWS's competition here
PASW vs TRNS Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TRNS has a market cap of 681.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while TRNS trades at $73.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas TRNS's P/E ratio is 85.91. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRNS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to TRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check TRNS's competition here
PASW vs TITN Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TITN has a market cap of 435.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while TITN trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas TITN's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TITN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to TITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check TITN's competition here
PASW vs EVI Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, EVI has a market cap of 224.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while EVI trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas EVI's P/E ratio is 38.80. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EVI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is less volatile compared to EVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check EVI's competition here
PASW vs BRIA Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while BRIA trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRIA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check BRIA's competition here
PASW vs HTLM Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while HTLM trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check HTLM's competition here
PASW vs RECT Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RECT has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while RECT trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas RECT's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RECT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to RECT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check RECT's competition here
PASW vs HWCC Comparison May 2026
PASW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PASW stands at 2.9M. In comparison, HWCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PASW is priced at $0.16, while HWCC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PASW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.56, whereas HWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PASW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HWCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PASW is more volatile compared to HWCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PASW.Check HWCC's competition here