Transformers and Rectifiers (India) Limited (TRIL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRIL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRIL.BO | ₹745.95 | +5.00% | 112B | 133.44 | ₹5.59 | N/A |
| ABB.NS | ₹6,950.50 | +1.30% | 1.5T | 95.82 | ₹72.54 | +0.57% |
| POLYCAB.NS | ₹9,548.50 | -0.90% | 1.4T | 53.87 | ₹177.24 | +0.49% |
| POLYCAB.BO | ₹9,543.60 | -0.93% | 1.4T | 53.04 | ₹179.93 | +0.49% |
| CGPOWER.BO | ₹893.10 | -6.87% | 1.4T | 115.84 | ₹7.71 | +0.15% |
| CGPOWER.NS | ₹892.55 | -6.97% | 1.4T | 115.32 | ₹7.74 | +0.15% |
| POWERINDIA.NS | ₹31,040.00 | -8.10% | 1.4T | 134.58 | ₹230.64 | +0.02% |
| POWERINDIA.BO | ₹31,019.05 | -8.16% | 1.4T | 142.71 | ₹217.35 | +0.02% |
| HAVELLS.NS | ₹1,181.10 | -0.47% | 740.9B | 43.68 | ₹27.04 | +0.85% |
| HAVELLS.BO | ₹1,180.75 | -0.51% | 740.5B | 43.85 | ₹26.93 | +0.85% |
Stock Comparison
TRIL.BO vs ABB.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while ABB.NS trades at ₹6,950.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 95.82. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check ABB.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs POLYCAB.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, POLYCAB.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while POLYCAB.NS trades at ₹9,548.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas POLYCAB.NS's P/E ratio is 53.87. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POLYCAB.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check POLYCAB.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs POLYCAB.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, POLYCAB.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while POLYCAB.BO trades at ₹9,543.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas POLYCAB.BO's P/E ratio is 53.04. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POLYCAB.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check POLYCAB.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs CGPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, CGPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while CGPOWER.BO trades at ₹893.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas CGPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 115.84. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to CGPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check CGPOWER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs CGPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, CGPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while CGPOWER.NS trades at ₹892.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas CGPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 115.32. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to CGPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check CGPOWER.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs POWERINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while POWERINDIA.NS trades at ₹31,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas POWERINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 134.58. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POWERINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to POWERINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check POWERINDIA.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs POWERINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while POWERINDIA.BO trades at ₹31,019.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas POWERINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 142.71. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POWERINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to POWERINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check POWERINDIA.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HAVELLS.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HAVELLS.NS has a market cap of 740.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HAVELLS.NS trades at ₹1,181.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HAVELLS.NS's P/E ratio is 43.68. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAVELLS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HAVELLS.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HAVELLS.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HAVELLS.BO has a market cap of 740.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HAVELLS.BO trades at ₹1,180.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HAVELLS.BO's P/E ratio is 43.85. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAVELLS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HAVELLS.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs APARINDS.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, APARINDS.BO has a market cap of 569.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while APARINDS.BO trades at ₹14,174.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas APARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 56.63. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to APARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check APARINDS.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs APARINDS.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, APARINDS.NS has a market cap of 569.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while APARINDS.NS trades at ₹14,174.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas APARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 55.99. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to APARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check APARINDS.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs KEI.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, KEI.NS has a market cap of 503.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while KEI.NS trades at ₹5,270.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas KEI.NS's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to KEI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check KEI.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs KEI.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, KEI.BO has a market cap of 503.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while KEI.BO trades at ₹5,267.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas KEI.BO's P/E ratio is 54.84. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEI.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to KEI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check KEI.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SCHNEIDER.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 354.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹1,481.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 169.71. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SCHNEIDER.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.BO has a market cap of 354.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SCHNEIDER.BO trades at ₹1,481.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SCHNEIDER.BO's P/E ratio is 172.08. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCHNEIDER.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HONAUT.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HONAUT.BO has a market cap of 349.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HONAUT.BO trades at ₹39,540.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HONAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 64.98. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HONAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HONAUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HONAUT.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HONAUT.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HONAUT.NS has a market cap of 349.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HONAUT.NS trades at ₹39,515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HONAUT.NS's P/E ratio is 62.12. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HONAUT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HONAUT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HONAUT.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs RRKABEL.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, RRKABEL.NS has a market cap of 265B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while RRKABEL.NS trades at ₹2,343.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas RRKABEL.NS's P/E ratio is 53.75. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RRKABEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check RRKABEL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs RRKABEL.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, RRKABEL.BO has a market cap of 264.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while RRKABEL.BO trades at ₹2,341.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas RRKABEL.BO's P/E ratio is 52.96. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RRKABEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check RRKABEL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HBLENGINE.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.NS has a market cap of 226.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HBLENGINE.NS trades at ₹816.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HBLENGINE.NS's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBLENGINE.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HBLENGINE.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HBLENGINE.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.BO has a market cap of 226.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HBLENGINE.BO trades at ₹816.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HBLENGINE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBLENGINE.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HBLENGINE.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs FINCABLES.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, FINCABLES.NS has a market cap of 168.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while FINCABLES.NS trades at ₹1,100.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas FINCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FINCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check FINCABLES.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs FINCABLES.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, FINCABLES.BO has a market cap of 168B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while FINCABLES.BO trades at ₹1,100.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas FINCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FINCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check FINCABLES.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs ARE&M.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, ARE&M.BO has a market cap of 156.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while ARE&M.BO trades at ₹856.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas ARE&M.BO's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARE&M.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check ARE&M.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs ARE&M.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, ARE&M.NS has a market cap of 156.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while ARE&M.NS trades at ₹855.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas ARE&M.NS's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARE&M.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check ARE&M.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HBLPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.NS has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HBLPOWER.NS trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HBLPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBLPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HBLPOWER.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HBLPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HBLPOWER.BO trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HBLPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBLPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HBLPOWER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs VGUARD.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, VGUARD.BO has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while VGUARD.BO trades at ₹303.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas VGUARD.BO's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VGUARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to VGUARD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check VGUARD.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs VGUARD.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, VGUARD.NS has a market cap of 132.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while VGUARD.NS trades at ₹302.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas VGUARD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VGUARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to VGUARD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check VGUARD.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs GRAPHITE.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.NS has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while GRAPHITE.NS trades at ₹627.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas GRAPHITE.NS's P/E ratio is 64.23. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRAPHITE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to GRAPHITE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check GRAPHITE.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs GRAPHITE.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.BO has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while GRAPHITE.BO trades at ₹627.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas GRAPHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 64.20. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRAPHITE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to GRAPHITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check GRAPHITE.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs TRIL.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, TRIL.NS has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while TRIL.NS trades at ₹745.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas TRIL.NS's P/E ratio is 134.05. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to TRIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check TRIL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DIACABS.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 104.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹198.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 66.52. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DIACABS.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹198.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is -198.55. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs AMARAJABAT.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, AMARAJABAT.NS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while AMARAJABAT.NS trades at ₹604.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas AMARAJABAT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMARAJABAT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to AMARAJABAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check AMARAJABAT.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HEG.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HEG.NS has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HEG.NS trades at ₹526.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HEG.NS's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HEG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HEG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HEG.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs TARIL.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, TARIL.NS has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while TARIL.NS trades at ₹336.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas TARIL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TARIL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to TARIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check TARIL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs VOLTAMP.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.NS has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while VOLTAMP.NS trades at ₹9,702.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas VOLTAMP.NS's P/E ratio is 63.63. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VOLTAMP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAMP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check VOLTAMP.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs VOLTAMP.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.BO has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while VOLTAMP.BO trades at ₹9,696.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas VOLTAMP.BO's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VOLTAMP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check VOLTAMP.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs ESABINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, ESABINDIA.NS has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while ESABINDIA.NS trades at ₹5,834.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas ESABINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 51.50. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESABINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to ESABINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check ESABINDIA.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs ESABINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, ESABINDIA.BO has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while ESABINDIA.BO trades at ₹5,817.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas ESABINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 51.35. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESABINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to ESABINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check ESABINDIA.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs GENUSPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while GENUSPOWER.BO trades at ₹322.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas GENUSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GENUSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs GENUSPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.NS has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while GENUSPOWER.NS trades at ₹321.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas GENUSPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GENUSPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs QPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, QPOWER.NS has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while QPOWER.NS trades at ₹1,132.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas QPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 120.31. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check QPOWER.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs PRECWIRE.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.NS has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while PRECWIRE.NS trades at ₹400.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas PRECWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 46.65. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRECWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to PRECWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check PRECWIRE.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs PRECWIRE.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.BO has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while PRECWIRE.BO trades at ₹399.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas PRECWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 46.51. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRECWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to PRECWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check PRECWIRE.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs QPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, QPOWER.BO has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while QPOWER.BO trades at ₹909.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas QPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 180.85. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check QPOWER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SHILCTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SHILCTECH.BO has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SHILCTECH.BO trades at ₹4,408.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SHILCTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 49.30. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHILCTECH.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SHILCTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SHILCTECH.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs UNIVCABLES.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.BO has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while UNIVCABLES.BO trades at ₹1,171.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas UNIVCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNIVCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs UNIVCABLES.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.NS has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while UNIVCABLES.NS trades at ₹1,170.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas UNIVCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNIVCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs VMARCIND.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, VMARCIND.NS has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while VMARCIND.NS trades at ₹1,546.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas VMARCIND.NS's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VMARCIND.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to VMARCIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check VMARCIND.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HIRECT.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HIRECT.BO has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HIRECT.BO trades at ₹1,093.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HIRECT.BO's P/E ratio is 83.38. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HIRECT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HIRECT.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HIRECT.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HIRECT.NS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HIRECT.NS trades at ₹1,092.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HIRECT.NS's P/E ratio is 51.79. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HIRECT.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HIRECT.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs MARINE.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, MARINE.NS has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while MARINE.NS trades at ₹280.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas MARINE.NS's P/E ratio is 66.90. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MARINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to MARINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check MARINE.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs RAMRAT.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, RAMRAT.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while RAMRAT.NS trades at ₹395.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas RAMRAT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAMRAT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check RAMRAT.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs RAMRAT.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, RAMRAT.BO has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while RAMRAT.BO trades at ₹395.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas RAMRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAMRAT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check RAMRAT.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs INDOTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, INDOTECH.NS has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while INDOTECH.NS trades at ₹3,136.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas INDOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 35.91. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check INDOTECH.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs INDOTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, INDOTECH.BO has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while INDOTECH.BO trades at ₹3,126.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas INDOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check INDOTECH.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs BBL.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, BBL.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while BBL.NS trades at ₹2,718.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas BBL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to BBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check BBL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs BBL.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, BBL.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while BBL.BO trades at ₹2,720.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas BBL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to BBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check BBL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SPECTRUM.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SPECTRUM.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SPECTRUM.NS trades at ₹1,853.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SPECTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is 73.34. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPECTRUM.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SPECTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SPECTRUM.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs EVEREADY.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, EVEREADY.BO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while EVEREADY.BO trades at ₹368.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas EVEREADY.BO's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVEREADY.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to EVEREADY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check EVEREADY.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs EVEREADY.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, EVEREADY.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while EVEREADY.NS trades at ₹367.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas EVEREADY.NS's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVEREADY.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to EVEREADY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check EVEREADY.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs MODINSU.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, MODINSU.BO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while MODINSU.BO trades at ₹551.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas MODINSU.BO's P/E ratio is 134.52. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MODINSU.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to MODINSU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check MODINSU.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs RISHABH.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, RISHABH.BO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while RISHABH.BO trades at ₹650.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas RISHABH.BO's P/E ratio is 328.66. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RISHABH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to RISHABH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check RISHABH.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs EXICOM.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, EXICOM.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while EXICOM.BO trades at ₹178.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas EXICOM.BO's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXICOM.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check EXICOM.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs EXICOM.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, EXICOM.NS has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while EXICOM.NS trades at ₹178.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas EXICOM.NS's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXICOM.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check EXICOM.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HPL.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HPL.NS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HPL.NS trades at ₹356.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HPL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HPL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HPL.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HPL.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HPL.BO trades at ₹356.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HPL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HPL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SERVOTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SERVOTECH.NS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SERVOTECH.NS trades at ₹101.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SERVOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.41. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SERVOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to SERVOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SERVOTECH.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs MARSONS.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, MARSONS.BO has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while MARSONS.BO trades at ₹113.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas MARSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 290.08. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MARSONS.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to MARSONS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check MARSONS.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DYCL.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DYCL.NS has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DYCL.NS trades at ₹362.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DYCL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DYCL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DYCL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DYCL.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DYCL.BO has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DYCL.BO trades at ₹362.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DYCL.BO's P/E ratio is 105.99. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DYCL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DYCL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs IKIO.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, IKIO.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while IKIO.BO trades at ₹204.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas IKIO.BO's P/E ratio is 41.63. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IKIO.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to IKIO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check IKIO.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs IKIO.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, IKIO.NS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while IKIO.NS trades at ₹202.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas IKIO.NS's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IKIO.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to IKIO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check IKIO.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SALZERELEC.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SALZERELEC.NS trades at ₹633.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SALZERELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SALZERELEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to SALZERELEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SALZERELEC.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SALZERELEC.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.BO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SALZERELEC.BO trades at ₹632.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SALZERELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SALZERELEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to SALZERELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SALZERELEC.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DPEL.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DPEL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DPEL.NS trades at ₹515.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 113.82. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to DPEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DPEL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs MODISONLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while MODISONLTD.BO trades at ₹300.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas MODISONLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MODISONLTD.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check MODISONLTD.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs MODISONLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while MODISONLTD.NS trades at ₹299.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas MODISONLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MODISONLTD.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check MODISONLTD.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HUIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HUIL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HUIL.BO trades at ₹1,272.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HUIL.BO's P/E ratio is -34.16. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUIL.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HUIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HUIL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs MEIL.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, MEIL.NS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while MEIL.NS trades at ₹306.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas MEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to MEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check MEIL.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs PROSTARM.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, PROSTARM.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while PROSTARM.NS trades at ₹135.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas PROSTARM.NS's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PROSTARM.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to PROSTARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check PROSTARM.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SALZER.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SALZER.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SALZER.BO trades at ₹444.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SALZER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SALZER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to SALZER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SALZER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SUPREMEPWR.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SUPREMEPWR.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SUPREMEPWR.NS trades at ₹236.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SUPREMEPWR.NS's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SUPREMEPWR.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SAAKSHI.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SAAKSHI.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SAAKSHI.NS trades at ₹294.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SAAKSHI.NS's P/E ratio is 110.66. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAAKSHI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SAAKSHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SAAKSHI.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs HIGHENE.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, HIGHENE.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while HIGHENE.BO trades at ₹560.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas HIGHENE.BO's P/E ratio is 43.66. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HIGHENE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to HIGHENE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check HIGHENE.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs ELIN.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, ELIN.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while ELIN.BO trades at ₹100.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas ELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check ELIN.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs ELIN.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, ELIN.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while ELIN.NS trades at ₹100.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas ELIN.NS's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELIN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check ELIN.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DENORA.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DENORA.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DENORA.BO trades at ₹874.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DENORA.BO's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DENORA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DENORA.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DENORA.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DENORA.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DENORA.NS trades at ₹879.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DENORA.NS's P/E ratio is 51.56. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DENORA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DENORA.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs S&SPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, S&SPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while S&SPOWER.NS trades at ₹354.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas S&SPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 4827.80. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to S&SPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to S&SPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check S&SPOWER.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs WSI.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, WSI.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while WSI.NS trades at ₹66.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas WSI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WSI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to WSI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check WSI.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs AEPL.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, AEPL.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while AEPL.BO trades at ₹17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas AEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 82.51. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to AEPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check AEPL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs SHERA.NS Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, SHERA.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while SHERA.NS trades at ₹149.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas SHERA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHERA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SHERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check SHERA.NS's competition here
TRIL.BO vs DLTNCBL.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, DLTNCBL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while DLTNCBL.BO trades at ₹421.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas DLTNCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.51. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DLTNCBL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to DLTNCBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check DLTNCBL.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs COSPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, COSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while COSPOWER.BO trades at ₹1,897.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas COSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is more volatile compared to COSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check COSPOWER.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs WSIND.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, WSIND.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while WSIND.BO trades at ₹131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas WSIND.BO's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WSIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to WSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check WSIND.BO's competition here
TRIL.BO vs RMC.BO Comparison July 2026
TRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIL.BO stands at 112B. In comparison, RMC.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIL.BO is priced at ₹745.95, while RMC.BO trades at ₹304.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 133.44, whereas RMC.BO's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, TRIL.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RMC.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIL.BO is less volatile compared to RMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIL.BO.Check RMC.BO's competition here